The role of subject literature in scholarly communication: An interpretation based on social epistemology

In this article an epistemological interpretation of the role of subject literature in scholarly communication shall be proposed. Such an interpretation will focus on the epistemological dimension of communicating knowledge through literature and how this is achieved through discursive and rhetorical means. It will be argued that library and information science (LIS) theory on scholarly communication can be supplemented and strengthened by this interpretation. By establishing a social epistemology of subject literature the article contributes with a sketch of a coherent theory of scholarly literature explaining the epistemological and communicative division of labor between the various types of subject literature. Such a theory is in line with the current revival of social epistemology in LIS. The article is structured into three main sections. The first section will outline an epistemological position that pays particular attention to knowledge acquired through social interaction in general, and through interaction with written texts in particular. The works of the later Wittgenstein and Ludwik Fleck will be used as the theoretical frameworks. Having established this epistemological framework, the second section will outline what is considered to be the main types of subject literature, with emphasis on their discursive and rhetorical functions in scholarly communication. The third section will synthesize the two other sections into a sketch of a theory that will be labeled the social epistemology of subject literature and point to some implications for LIS research of this theory.

[1]  T. Kuhn The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[2]  K. Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2001 .

[3]  Jack Selzer,et al.  Understanding scientific prose , 1993 .

[4]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  The Concept of 'subject' in Information Science , 1992, J. Documentation.

[5]  Hanne Andersen,et al.  Stabilizing and Changing Phenomenal Worlds: Ludwik Fleck and Thomas Kuhn on Scientific Literature , 2001 .

[6]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[7]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information: Revising and updating the UNISIST model , 2003, J. Documentation.

[8]  CHRISTINE L. BORGMAN,et al.  Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication , 2000, J. Documentation.

[9]  P. Wilson Two kinds of power : an essay on bibliographical control , 1978 .

[10]  Henry Small,et al.  Cited Documents as Concept Symbols , 1978 .

[11]  Endre Száva-Kováts,et al.  Indirect-collective referencing (ICR) in the elite journal literature of physics. II. A literature science study on the level of communications , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  D. W. Langridge Classification and indexing in the humanities , 1976 .

[13]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Theory and metatheory of information science: a new interpretation , 1998, J. Documentation.

[14]  Julian Warner Writing and literary work in copyright: a binational and historical analysis , 1993 .

[15]  Brian Vickery Classification and indexing in science , 1975 .

[16]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Information retrieval, text composition, and semantics , 1998 .

[17]  Greg Myers,et al.  Writing biology : texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge , 1990 .

[18]  Ann Peterson Bishop,et al.  Document Structure and Digital Libraries: How Researchers Mobilize Information in Journal Articles , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[19]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Subject Access Points in Electronic Retrieval. , 2001 .

[21]  Charles Bazerman,et al.  Persuasion at a Distance. (Book Reviews: Shaping Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science.) , 1990 .

[22]  Helen R. Tibbo,et al.  Abstracting, Information Retrieval and the Humanities: Providing Access to Historical Literature , 1993 .

[23]  R. Merton,et al.  Genesis and development of a scientific fact , 1979 .

[24]  A. Goldman Knowledge in a Social World , 1999 .

[25]  David Ellis,et al.  A Behavioural Approach to Information Retrieval System Design , 1989, J. Documentation.

[26]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication , 1984 .

[27]  J. Shera Foundations of a Theory of Bibliography , 1952, The Library Quarterly.

[28]  Anthony M. Woodward,et al.  The roles of reviews in information transfer , 1977, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Frederick F. Schmitt Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge , 1994 .

[30]  J. Ziman,et al.  Public knowledge. An essay concerning the social dimension of science , 1970, Medical History.

[31]  N. Roberts,et al.  Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority: P. Wilson. London: Greenwood Press, 1983. 210 pp. ISBN 0 313 23763 8. £28.95. , 1985 .

[32]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[33]  C. Bazerman,et al.  Textual dynamics of the professions : historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities , 1991 .

[34]  Jack Andersen Written knowledge: A literary perspective on indexing theory , 2000 .

[35]  Jorge J. E. Gracia,et al.  A Theory of Textuality: The Logic and Epistemology , 1995 .

[36]  Julian Warner Information, Knowledge, Text , 2001 .

[37]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 , 1998 .

[38]  Peter Dear,et al.  The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument: Historical Studies , 1991 .

[39]  C. Borgman,et al.  Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. , 1992 .

[40]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  D. Bloor,et al.  Knowledge and Social Imagery , 1977 .

[42]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Retrieval techniques , 1987 .

[43]  Patrick Wilson,et al.  The Cognitive and the Social@@@The Social Construction of Science: A Comparative Study of Goal Direction Research Evolution, and Legitimation.@@@Second-Hand Knowledge: An Inquiry into Cognitive Authority. , 1983 .