Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation

A review of the policy implementation literature finds the field split into two major schools, top-down and bottom-up. Previous attempts to reconcile these models are described, followed by an alternative model. This model reconciles these approaches by concentrating on the theoretical significance of ambiguity and conflict for policy implementation. A number offactors crucial to the implementation process are identified as varyingly dependent on a policy's ambiguity and conflict level. Four policy implementation paradigms are identified and the relevance of the existing literature to these conditions is discussed. The four paradigms are low conflict-low ambiguity (administrative implementation), high conflict-low ambiguity (political implementation), high conflict-high ambiguity (symbolic implementation), and low conflicthigh ambiguity (experimental implementation).

[1]  Murray Edelman,et al.  Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail , 1977 .

[2]  P. Berman,et al.  The study of macro- and micro-implementation. , 1978, Public policy.

[3]  W. Gormley.  Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System , 1986, Polity.

[4]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[5]  David Irwin,et al.  Helping small firms grow , 1986 .

[6]  M. Mclaughlin.  Learning From Experience: Lessons From Policy Implementation , 1987 .

[7]  J. March,et al.  Implementation and ambiguity , 1986 .

[8]  Andrew Dunsire.  Implementation in a bureaucracy , 1978 .

[9]  E. J. Ingram,et al.  The Politics of Policy Implementation. , 1978 .

[10]  Priscilla M. Regan.  Personal Information Policies in the United States and Britain: The Dilemma of Implementation Considerations , 1984, Journal of Public Policy.

[11]  C. Hull,et al.  Helping Small Firms Grow : An Implementation Approach , 1987 .

[12]  Johan P. Olsen.  LOCAL BUDGETING, DECISON-MAKING OR A RITUAL ACT? , 1970 .

[13]  O. Holsti,et al.  Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1972 .

[14]  A. R. Ilersic,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1961 .

[15]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Incorporating Multiple Actors and Guidance Instruments into Models of Regulatory Policymaking , 1987 .

[16]  S. Winter.  How Policy-Making Affects Implementation: The Decentralization of the Danish Disablement Pension Administration * , 1986 .

[17]  Daniel A. Mazmanian,et al.  Implementation and public policy , 1983 .

[18]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  Complex organizations : a sociological reader , 1961 .

[19]  Graham Allison,et al.  Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1972 .

[20]  T. Lowi.  End of Liberalism? , 2020, Neoliberal Nationalism.

[21]  David R. Mayhew.  Congress: The Electoral Connection , 1975 .

[22]  James C. Hershauer.  The New Science of Management Decision , 1978 .

[23]  Chris Hull,et al.  Implementation Research as Empirical Constitutionalism , 1982 .

[24]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[25]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[26]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The new science of management decision , 1960 .

[27]  Carl E. Van Horn,et al.  The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework , 1975 .

[28]  A. Schneider,et al.  Improving Implementation Through Framing Smarter Statutes , 1990, Journal of Public Policy.

[29]  A. Kahn,et al.  The economics of regulation , 1970 .

[30]  岸 眞理子.  ゴミ箱モデル(garbage can model) , 1994 .

[31]  P. Joskow,et al.  Regulation in Theory and Practice: An Overview , 1981 .

[32]  M. Lipsky,et al.  Street-Level Bureaucrats and Institutional Innovation: Implementing Special-Education Reform , 1977 .

[33]  James G. March,et al.  Ambiguity and Command: Organizational Perspectives on Military Decision Making , 1986 .

[34]  Measuring Degrees of Successful Implementation , 1984 .

[35]  Benny Hjern,et al.  Implementation Research — The Link Gone Missing , 1982, Journal of Public Policy.

[36]  S. Kelman.  Using implementation research to solve implementation problems: The case of energy emergency assistance , 1984 .

[37]  J. March,et al.  An introduction to models in the social sciences , 1975 .

[38]  R. Elmore,et al.  Organizational models of social program implementation. , 1978, Public policy.

[39]  Benny Hjern,et al.  Implementation Structures: A New Unit of Administrative Analysis , 1981 .

[40]  Richard F. Elmore,et al.  The politics of policy implementation , 1980 .

[41]  L. O'toole.  GOAL MULTIPLICITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION SETTING: SUBTLE IMPACTS AND THE CASE OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PRIVATIZATION1 , 1989 .

[42]  H. Brachinger,et al.  Decision analysis , 1997 .

[43]  Richard F. Elmore,et al.  Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions , 1979 .

[44]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Policy Recommendations for Multi-Actor Implementation: An Assessment of the Field , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[45]  R. Dahrendorf.  Toward a theory of social conflict , 1958 .

[46]  R. Durant.  EPA, TVA and Pollution Control: Implications for a Theory of Regulatory Policy Implementation , 1984 .

[47]  C. Hull,et al.  Small Firm Employment Creation: An Assistance Structure Explanation , 1985 .

[48]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[49]  M. Goggin,et al.  Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[50]  Dennis J. Palumbo,et al.  Street-Wise Social Policy: Resolving the Dilemma of Street-Level Influence and Successful Implementation , 1990 .

[51]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[52]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  A DESIGN PERSPECTIVE ON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION: THE FALLACIES OF MISPLACED PRESCRIPTION , 1987 .

[53]  Morton H. Halperin,et al.  Bureaucratic Politics And Foreign Policy , 1975 .

[54]  Daniel A. Mazmanian,et al.  Effective policy implementation , 1981 .