Do Mental Processes Share a Domain-General Resource?

What determines success and failure in dual-task situations? Many theories propose that the extent to which two activities can be performed concurrently depends on the nature of the information involved in the activities. In particular, verbal and visuospatial activities are thought to be fueled by distinct resources, so that interference occurs between two verbal activities or two visuospatial activities, but little or no interference occurs between verbal and visuospatial activities. The current study examined trade-offs in four dual-task situations in which participants maintained verbal or visuospatial information while concurrently processing either verbal or visuospatial information. We manipulated the cognitive load of concurrent processing and assessed recall performance in each condition. Results revealed that both verbal and visuospatial recall performance decreased as a direct function of increasing cognitive load, regardless of the nature of the information concurrently processed. The observed trade-offs suggest strongly that verbal and visuospatial activities compete for a common domain-general pool of resources.

[1]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination , 2003 .

[2]  A. Miyake,et al.  The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Sophie Portrat,et al.  Working memory in children: a time-constrained functioning similar to adults. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working Memory: The multiple-component model , 1999 .

[5]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[6]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Processing and Storage in Working Memory Span , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  Satoru Saito,et al.  The Relationship between Processing and Storage in Working Memory Span: Not Two Sides of the Same Coin. , 2007 .

[8]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  The effects of processing time and processing rate on forgetting in working memory: Testing four models of the complex span paradigm , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Sarah E. MacPherson,et al.  Concurrent performance of two memory tasks: Evidence for domain-specific working memory systems , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[10]  E. Farmer,et al.  Evidence for a Visuo-Spatial Scratch-Pad in Working Memory , 1986 .

[11]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[12]  Karl Christoph Klauer,et al.  Working memory and changing-state hypothesis. , 1999 .

[13]  R H Logie,et al.  Interference with visual short-term memory. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[14]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time and cognitive load in working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  R. Engle,et al.  The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[19]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[20]  P. Jolicœur,et al.  Visual short-term memory: Central capacity limitations in short-term consolidation , 2007 .

[21]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a Human Experimental Psychology Dementia and Working Memory Dementia and Working Memory , 2022 .

[22]  Alan D Baddeley,et al.  The complexities of complex span: explaining individual differences in working memory in children and adults. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  G J Hitch,et al.  Is there a Relationship between Task Demand and Storage Space in Tests of Working Memory Capacity? , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time-related decay or interference-based forgetting in working memory? , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  How Can Dual-Task Working Memory Retention Limits Be Investigated? , 2007, Psychological science.

[26]  J. Towse,et al.  Working memory as a construct in cognitive science:An illustrious past and a highly promising future , 2007 .

[27]  David E. Kieras,et al.  An Overview of the EPIC Architecture for Cognition and Performance With Application to Human-Computer Interaction , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  Pierre Barrouillet,et al.  Two maintenance mechanisms of verbal information in working memory , 2009 .

[29]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[30]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Aptitude Testing Inspired by Information Processing: A Test of the Four-Sources Model , 1993 .

[31]  Robbie Case,et al.  Intellectual development : birth to adulthood , 1985 .