Carbon dioxide treatment method for autonomous underwater vehicles powered by direct methanol fuel cells: A multi-criteria decision analysis approach

Abstract Autonomous Underwater Vehicles are very valuable tools in a great variety of marine related sectors that demand new capacities and improvements. These improvements go through increasing their endurance and, in this sense, the use of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells can be very interesting with an adequate CO2 Treatment Method. This work investigates four CO2 Treatment Methods for their application onboard Autonomous Underwater Vehicles powered by a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell-based power plant. The evaluation was carried out considering different working conditions defined by the fuel cell power, navigation depth and endurance. To rank the treatment methods, three Multi Criteria Decision Methods and eight selection criteria were used. The results show that direct disposal of CO2 ejecting it outside the Autonomous Underwater Vehicle is the most adequate method for navigation depths up to 50 m. For deeper waters CO2 storage embedded in an adsorbent material and CO2 stored as a pressurized gas seem to be the best choices. In all cases, the results present a good stability against changes in the criteria weights vector.

[1]  J. S. Hoffman,et al.  Comparison of microwave and conventional heating for CO2 desorption from zeolite 13X , 2021 .

[2]  Y. Chabal,et al.  Understanding and controlling water stability of MOF-74 , 2016, 1604.00337.

[3]  Rafael d’Amore-Domenech,et al.  Multicriteria analysis of seawater electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production at sea , 2020 .

[4]  Peng Lu,et al.  Maximum packing densities of basic 3D objects , 2010 .

[5]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1981 .

[6]  M. A. Raso,et al.  Automated design of direct methanol fuel cell stacks: A quick optimization , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[7]  M. Bastos-Neto,et al.  Assessment of CO2 desorption from 13X zeolite for a prospective TSA process , 2019, Adsorption.

[8]  Loredana Magistri,et al.  Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Powered by Direct Methanol Fuel Cell-Based Power Plants: A Quick Preliminary Design Model , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[9]  Martin Gilljam,et al.  Fuel cell systems for long-endurance autonomous underwater vehicles – challenges and benefits , 2020 .

[10]  Jing-nan Sun,et al.  Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. , 2006, Journal of environmental sciences.

[11]  M. A. Raso,et al.  Autonomous underwater vehicles powered by fuel cells: Design guidelines , 2018 .

[12]  Gang Kou,et al.  A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Azah Mohamed,et al.  Review of energy storage systems for electric vehicle applications: Issues and challenges , 2017 .

[14]  Dazhuan Wu,et al.  Design, Selection and Application of Energy Recovery Device in Seawater Desalination: A Review , 2020, Energies.

[15]  Carl Q. Howard,et al.  Recent developments in submarine vibration isolation and noise control , 2011 .

[16]  Tapabrata Ray,et al.  A brief taxonomy of autonomous underwater vehicle design literature , 2014 .

[17]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[18]  Ömer Akgiray,et al.  A revisit of pressure drop-flow rate correlations for packed beds of spheres , 2015 .

[19]  M. McLinden,et al.  NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 8.0 , 2007 .

[20]  E. Kakaras,et al.  The CO2 economy: Review of CO2 capture and reuse technologies , 2018 .

[21]  Henrikas Sivilevičius,et al.  The criteria for identifying the quality of passengers’ transportation by railway and their ranking using AHP method , 2010 .

[22]  M. A. Raso,et al.  Selection of thermoplastic polymers for use as bipolar plates in direct methanol fuel cell applications , 2019 .

[23]  S. Assabumrungrat,et al.  A modeling study on the effects of membrane characteristics and operating parameters on physical abs , 2011 .

[24]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  A Sensitivity analysis in MCDM problems: A statistical approach , 2018, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[25]  H. Hirayama,et al.  Fuel cell system of AUV "Urashima" , 2004, Oceans '04 MTS/IEEE Techno-Ocean '04 (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37600).

[26]  W. Rohsenow,et al.  Handbook of Heat Transfer , 1998 .

[27]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[28]  T. Arndt Adsorption , 2019, Springer Reference Medizin.

[29]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Metal–organic frameworks with potential for energy-efficient adsorptive separation of light hydrocarbons , 2012 .

[30]  S. Deng,et al.  Adsorption of CO2 and CH4 on a magnesium-based metal organic framework. , 2011, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[31]  O. Hasvold,et al.  The alkaline aluminium hydrogen peroxide semi-fuel cell for the HUGIN 3000 autonomous underwater vehicle , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Workshop on Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, 2002..

[32]  James Larminie,et al.  Fuel Cell Systems Explained , 2000 .

[33]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .