Development and Usability Test of the Real-Time Comprehensive Dashboard for Emergency Department : A 5-Year Experience Case Study

Background: The task of monitoring and managing the entire emergency department (ED) is becoming important to the ED staff since EDs get increasingly crowded and treatments become more complex. Recently, dashboards have received the spotlight as health information technology to support these tasks. Objective: This study aimed to describe the process of developing a real-time comprehensive dashboard for ED and to evaluate its usability by clinical staffs. Methods: We developed a dashboard based on three dashboard principles —“anytime, anywhere, at a glance”; “minimal interruption to workflow”; and “protect patient privacy”—and three design concepts—“geographic layout,” “patient-level alert,” and “real-time summary data.” The measurements on the dashboard were selected based on the throughput factor of the conceptual model of ED crowding. We also surveyed ED physicians and nurses using a system usability scale (SUS) and situation awareness index, a questionnaire we created based on the construct of the situation awareness rating technique. Results: The first ED dashboard was successfully launched in 2013 and has undergone three major revisions because of geographical change to the ED and to improve usability. A total of 52 ED staff members participated in the survey. The average SUS score of the dashboard was 67.6 points. The participants also evaluated the dashboard as good at “concentration support” (4.15), “complexity representation” (4.02), “variability representation” (3.96), “information quality provided” (3.94), and “familiarity of dashboard” (3.94). However, the “division of attention” was rated 2.25 points. Conclusions: We developed the ED dashboard and successfully used it for five years. The ED physicians and nurses evaluated its usability as “OK to Good.” Trial Registration: IRB File No SMC 2018-01-040-001

[1]  Ian Scott,et al.  The ED‐inpatient dashboard: Uniting emergency and inpatient clinicians to improve the efficiency and quality of care for patients requiring emergency admission to hospital , 2017, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[2]  Jae Hyuk Lee,et al.  ED crowding and the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. , 2015, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[3]  Jonathan B. Perlin,et al.  Data‐Driven Process and Operational Improvement in the Emergency Department: The ED Dashboard and Reporting Application , 2012, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[4]  Anand S Dighe,et al.  Applying Lean methodologies reduces ED laboratory turnaround times. , 2015, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[5]  Steven L Bernstein,et al.  The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[6]  W. Cha,et al.  The impact of prolonged boarding of successfully resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients on survival-to-discharge rates. , 2015, Resuscitation.

[7]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale , 2009 .

[8]  Vickie Nguyen,et al.  Dashboard visualizations: Supporting real-time throughput decision-making , 2017, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[9]  P. Jarvis Improving emergency department patient flow , 2016, Clinical and experimental emergency medicine.

[10]  C. Ki,et al.  Control of an Outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in a Tertiary Hospital in Korea. , 2016, Annals of internal medicine.

[11]  Robert L. Wears,et al.  Emergency department status boards: user-evolved artefacts for inter- and intra-group coordination , 2007, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[12]  W. Cha,et al.  Emergency Department Crowding Disparity: a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study , 2016, Journal of Korean medical science.

[13]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  Artefactual Multiplicity: A Study of Emergency-Department Whiteboards , 2011, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[14]  Ming-Hsiang Tsou,et al.  Social media analytics and research test-bed (SMART dashboard) , 2015, SMSociety.

[15]  Khaled M Musallam,et al.  Implementation of an emergency department computer system: design features that users value. , 2011, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[16]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Situation Awareness and Workload in Aviation , 2002 .

[17]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[18]  J. Timsit,et al.  The Iatroref study: medical errors are associated with symptoms of depression in ICU staff but not burnout or safety culture , 2015, Intensive Care Medicine.

[19]  Rebecca Randell,et al.  Managing Quality and Safety in Real Time? Evidence from an Interview Study , 2016, MIE.

[20]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  Dashboards for improving patient care: Review of the literature , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[21]  Karin V Rhodes,et al.  A conceptual model of emergency department crowding. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[22]  Jesse M Pines,et al.  The effect of emergency department crowding on patient satisfaction for admitted patients. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[23]  D. Aronsky,et al.  Decreasing lab turnaround time improves emergency department throughput and decreases emergency medical services diversion: a simulation model. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[24]  L. Sanchez,et al.  Effect of emergency physician burnout on patient waiting times , 2018, Internal and Emergency Medicine.

[25]  M. Mccarthy,et al.  The crowding-effectiveness link: it doesn't matter how fast we deliver care if we don't deliver it right. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.