Design concept evaluation using soft sets based on acceptable and satisfactory levels: an integrated TOPSIS and Shannon entropy

Among several phases of new product development, concept selection is the most crucial activity and it gives perfection to further progress of a product. Customer’s ideas and linguistic requirements are often substantial in concept specifications to assess quantitative criteria, which gives satisfaction for a product to progress in the markets. This work aggregates concept selection on design parameters values by merging acceptable- and satisfactory-level needs of the customers. A promising framework is developed based on soft sets, TOPSIS and the Shannon entropy. Customer’s preferences on incorporating design values are identified based on acceptable- and satisfactory-level needs, and these preferences are weighted through Shannon entropy. By performing AND operation on the soft set of level requirements of one customer with the soft set of requirements of another customer, several weighted tables of soft sets are obtained on the pair of design parameters values. To obtain the best concept on different levels of requirements, TOPSIS is performed which provides several integrated evaluations. An illustration is considered for the demonstration of the method, brings the best concept for two customers which is acceptable for both of the customers, satisfactory for both the customers and vise-versa. Finally, the comparisons are presented with recent major existing methods.

[1]  Jin Qi,et al.  An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[2]  Kin Keung Lai,et al.  An novel approach to supplier selection based on vague sets group decision , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Naim Çagman,et al.  Soft set theory and uni-int decision making , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Nasruddin Hassan,et al.  Fuzzy Soft Expert System in Prediction of Coronary Artery Disease , 2016, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[5]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Assessing new product development project risk by Bayesian network with a systematic probability generation methodology , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Bing-Yuan Cao,et al.  Another View of Aggregation Operators on Group-Based Generalized Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Sets: Multi-Attribute Decision Making Methods , 2018, Symmetry.

[7]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Concurrent Design of Products and Processes: A Strategy for the Next Generation in Manufacturing , 1989 .

[8]  Mingyang Li,et al.  Screening alternatives considering different evaluation index sets: A method based on soft set theory , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  José Carlos Rodriguez Alcantud,et al.  Separable fuzzy soft sets and decision making with positive and negative attributes , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[10]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Suihuai Yu,et al.  Optimal selection of manufacturing services in cloud manufacturing: A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on rough ANP and rough TOPSIS , 2018, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[12]  J Wang,et al.  A design—decision support framework for evaluation of design options/proposals using a composite structure methodology based on the approximate reasoning approach and the evidential reasoning method , 2003 .

[13]  Mustafa Mat Deris,et al.  A soft set approach for association rules mining , 2011, Knowl. Based Syst..

[14]  A. R. Roy,et al.  Soft set theory , 2003 .

[15]  Xiang Peng,et al.  Conceptual design conceptual scheme optimization based on integrated design objectives , 2018, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[16]  Ming-Chyuan Lin,et al.  Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[17]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Maximum Entropy for Collaborative Filtering , 2004, UAI.

[18]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[19]  Muhammad Irfan Ali,et al.  Representation of graphs based on neighborhoods and soft sets , 2016, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[20]  M. Akram,et al.  Operations on Soft Graphs , 2015 .

[21]  Puneet Tandon,et al.  A bijective soft set theoretic approach for concept selection in design process , 2017 .

[22]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  The preference effect in design concept evaluation , 2014 .

[23]  Chin-Tsai Lin,et al.  Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate service performance of a travel intermediary , 2009 .

[24]  Andrew W. H. Ip,et al.  A dynamic decision support system to predict the value of customer for new product development , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  José Benito Bouza-Rodríguez,et al.  The Value Index as a decision support tool applied to a new system for evaluating and selecting design alternatives , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Mogens Myrup Andreasen,et al.  The Concept of Dispositions , 1990 .

[27]  Christoph Fuchs,et al.  Customer Empowerment in New Product Development , 2011 .

[28]  Marc A. Annacchino New Product Development: from Initial Idea to Product Management , 2003 .

[29]  A. R. Roy,et al.  An application of soft sets in a decision making problem , 2002 .

[30]  Stuart A. Rosenfeld Manufacturing by Design , 2018, Economic Development Quarterly.

[31]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Selection among Renewable Energy Alternatives Using Fuzzy Axiomatic Design: The Case of Turkey , 2010, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[32]  Xia Zhang,et al.  The bijective soft set with its operations , 2010, Comput. Math. Appl..

[33]  Zeki Ayag,et al.  An integrated approach to concept evaluation in a new product development , 2016, J. Intell. Manuf..

[34]  Andrea Hemetsberger,et al.  INTEGRATING EXPERT CUSTOMERS IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS - VIRTUAL ROUTES TO SUCCESS , 2017 .

[35]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[36]  R. Cooper,et al.  Maximizing Productivity in Product Innovation , 2008 .

[37]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[38]  Aslam Muhammad,et al.  On lattice ordered soft sets , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[39]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment , 2005 .

[40]  Gintaras V. Reklaitis,et al.  Impact of tactical and operational policies in the selection of a new product portfolio , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[41]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Consumer Cocreation in New Product Development , 2010 .

[42]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Evaluation of research proposals for grant funding using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2017, Soft Comput..

[43]  Jianming Zhan,et al.  A survey of decision making methods based on certain hybrid soft set models , 2016, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[44]  Puneet Tandon,et al.  Product design concept evaluation using rough sets and VIKOR method , 2016, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[45]  D. Molodtsov Soft set theory—First results , 1999 .

[46]  Christen Rose-Anderssen,et al.  New Product Development as a Complex Adaptive System of Decisions , 2006 .

[47]  José Carlos Rodriguez Alcantud,et al.  Glaucoma Diagnosis: A Soft Set Based Decision Making Procedure , 2015, CAEPIA.

[48]  Puneet Tandon,et al.  An integrated Shannon entropy and TOPSIS for product design concept evaluation based on bijective soft set , 2017, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[49]  A. M. King,et al.  Development of a Methodology for Concept Selection in Flexible Design Strategies , 1999 .

[50]  Bing-Yuan Cao,et al.  A New Type-2 Soft Set: Type-2 Soft Graphs and Their Applications , 2017, Adv. Fuzzy Syst..

[51]  Chih-Hsuan Wang,et al.  Outlier identification and market segmentation using kernel-based clustering techniques , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[52]  Guojun Wang,et al.  Wi-Fi frequency selection concept for effective coverage in collapsed structures , 2019, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[53]  Alain Bernard,et al.  Group multi-criteria design concept evaluation using combined rough set theory and fuzzy set theory , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[54]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[55]  Xiaoyan Liu,et al.  On some new operations in soft set theory , 2009, Comput. Math. Appl..

[56]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  An integrated approach to evaluating conceptual design alternatives in a new product development environment , 2005 .

[57]  Zaifang Zhang,et al.  A new integrated design concept evaluation approach based on vague sets , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[58]  Faruk Karaaslan,et al.  Characterizations of Certain Types of Type 2 Soft Graphs , 2018 .

[59]  Bing-Yuan Cao,et al.  Best concept selection in design process: An application of generalized intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets , 2018, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[60]  José Carlos Rodriguez Alcantud,et al.  A novel algorithm for fuzzy soft set based decision making from multiobserver input parameter data set , 2016, Inf. Fusion.