An empirical taxonomy for quality management systems: A study of the Hong Kong electronics industry

Abstract This study investigates the existence of different patterns of quality management systems (QMS) and the relationship between such patterns and organizational performance by conducting a quantitative and qualitative study of 225 international and local firms in the electronics industry in Hong Kong. A cluster analysis of the survey data results in the identification of four patterns of QMS, which are labeled as undeveloped, frame, accommodating and strategic, respectively, according to the characteristics that each pattern displays. These four types of QMS were found to be associated with various organizational performance measures according to the stage of their development. The study suggests that organizations can improve their time-based operational performance by establishing a frame quality system. However, the overall performance of an electronics company can be enhanced only by the establishment of a strategic quality system (SQS), which requires the involvement of top management. Our investigation further suggests that the development of a QMS is influenced by top management’s view on quality management. If quality management is viewed as an assurance system or a defensive strategy for answering customer requirements, a more advanced system will not be developed. The taxonomy developed here also enables researchers to understand the differences of major functions of quality systems at various stages of their development, the obstacles that management faces in the transformation process, and the corresponding strategies to be adopted.

[1]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  Approaches to the factory of the future. An empirical taxonomy , 1996 .

[2]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  A systemic approach to quality improvements: The interactions between the technical, human and quality systems , 1998 .

[3]  Jennifer L. Hartnett,et al.  Managing Quality: The Strategic and Competitive Edge , 1988 .

[4]  G. W. Milligan,et al.  An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms , 1980 .

[5]  David L. Goetsch,et al.  Introduction to Total Quality: Quality Management for Production, Processing, and Services , 1996 .

[6]  Paul Kline,et al.  An easy guide to factor analysis , 1993 .

[7]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[8]  R. Tryon Cluster Analysis , 1939 .

[9]  Mark S. Litwin,et al.  How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity , 1995 .

[10]  Dauid F. Percy Cluster Analysis (3rd Edition) , 1994 .

[11]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .

[12]  P. Rich The Organizational Taxonomy: Definition and Design , 1992 .

[13]  T. C. Powell Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[14]  Margaret A. Nemeth,et al.  Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysis , 1998, Technometrics.

[15]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[16]  Varun Grover,et al.  An Empirically Derived Taxonomy of Information Technology Structure and Its Relationship to Organizational Structure , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Joseph Moses Juran A history of managing for quality : the evolution, trends, and future directions of managing for quality , 1995 .

[18]  Donna B. Stoddard,et al.  Interorganizational business process redesign: merging technological and process innovation , 1996 .

[19]  J. Stevens Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[20]  Louis E. Raho,et al.  Quality system chaining: The next link in the evolution of quality , 1997 .

[21]  C. R. Hinings,et al.  Organizational Diversity and Change in Institutional Theory , 1998 .

[22]  Cheong-leung Andy. Yeung,et al.  Quality management system and its association with organizational performance , 1999 .

[23]  M. Aldenderfer Cluster Analysis , 1984 .

[24]  V. Minichiello In-depth Interviewing: Researching People , 1992 .

[25]  Michael Kaye,et al.  The fifth era , 1995 .

[26]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND AN ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT , 1994 .

[27]  Navin Shamji Dedhia Evolution of the quality profession , 1997 .

[28]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Populations, Natural Selection, and Applied Organizational Science. , 1983 .

[29]  A. Bryman Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[30]  L. Yorks,et al.  Beyond Total Quality Management: Toward The Emerging Paradigm , 1994 .

[31]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  Quality-related Action Programs: Their Impact on Quality Performance and Firm Performance , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[32]  Carol A. Saslow,et al.  Basic research methods , 1982 .

[33]  L. J. Porter,et al.  Identification of the Critical Factors of TQM , 1996 .

[34]  B. McKelvey Organizational Systematics-Taxonomy, Evolution, Classification , 1982 .

[35]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[36]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Reexamining a Model for Evaluating Information Center Success Using a Structural Equation Modeling Approach , 1997 .

[37]  Janelle Heineke,et al.  Mastering the quality staircase, step by step , 1997 .

[38]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[39]  B. Everitt,et al.  Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. , 1993 .

[40]  Robert J. Vokurka,et al.  The empirical assessment of construct validity , 1998 .

[41]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Total Quality Control , 1992 .

[42]  Linda Fung-Yee Ng,et al.  System building and implementations of TQM in Greater China: an overview , 1998 .

[43]  William H. Glick,et al.  Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling , 1994 .