Fuzzy MCDM-based GIS model for subsea oil pipeline route optimization: An integrated approach

ABSTRACT Proper pipeline route selection is an integral component of a typical oil exploration and transportation project. Improperly selected routes could have severe consequences including pipe failures, oil spillage, and environmental disasters. Consequently, technologies like geographic information systems (GIS) are increasingly being used to facilitate the oil pipeline route selection procedure—especially for onshore routing projects. Surprisingly, not much has been documented on the application of GIS to offshore pipeline routing. With recent discoveries on the merits of offshore oil exploration, it is necessary to extend the analytical capabilities of GIS to the unique offshore domain. However, concerns have been raised regarding the limitations of GIS in accurately prioritizing diverse selection criteria in typical multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems like route selection. Consequently, this paper addresses the offshore/subsea pipeline routing constraint using a hybrid decision support system (DSS), which integrates a GIS and fuzzy logic-based approximate reasoning (AR) models for optimal performance. The resultant spatial decision support system (SDSS) was successfully applied to a case study in Malaysia. The AR algorithm calculated the significance level of the multiple criteria using various fuzzy linguistic variables and membership functions. The aggregated priority ranking from different pipeline routing experts showed that the overall influence of the environmental criteria (61.4%) significantly exceeded that of other equally important criteria in the study area. These rankings were inputted into the SDSS to simulate various probable routes. Final results accurately highlighted an optimal route, which places a premium on the protection of environmental features in the subsea study area—in alignment with the preferences of majority of the experts.

[1]  J. A. Schmidt,et al.  MERGED GIS, GPS DATA ASSIST SITING FOR GULF GAS LINE , 1998 .

[2]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  Integrating multicriteria analysis and geographic information systems: the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) approach , 2006 .

[3]  Ahmad M. Salah,et al.  Pipeline Alignment Optimization: Automated GIS-Based Approach , 2011 .

[4]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Integrating Geographical Information Systems and Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Methods , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Ching-Chow Yang,et al.  KEY QUALITY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USING FUZZY AHP , 2004 .

[6]  Enhancing the Pipeline Route Selection Process , .

[7]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Carlos Henrique Pereira Mello,et al.  ON THE AGGREGATION OF INDIVIDUAL PRIORITIES IN INCOMPLETE HIERARCHIES , 2013 .

[9]  Alan C Hutson.  A Guide to Route Selection for Large Diameter Pipeline Projects , 2006 .

[10]  Craig Stephen,et al.  Using expert informed GIS to locate important marine social-ecological hotspots. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Liefei Xu April.  THE PROTOTYPE , 1982, The Lancet.

[13]  Beng Chung Chai.  Submarine pipeline routing and inspection with geographical information system technology , 2006 .

[14]  William Mackaness,et al.  GIS As a Spatial Decision Support System for Offshore Pipeline Route Optimisation , 2002 .

[15]  Saroj Koul,et al.  DYNAMIC VENDOR SELECTION: A FUZZY AHP APPROACH , 2012 .

[16]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  An essay on rank preservation and reversal , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[17]  J. S. Wilburn,et al.  Major Asian subsea pipeline to start up this year , 1995 .

[18]  R. K. Singh,et al.  A fuzzy TOPSIS based approach for e-sourcing , 2011, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[19]  Adli Mustafa,et al.  Group decision via usage of analytic hierarchy process and preference aggregation method (Keputusan berkumpulan menggunakan proses hierarki analisis dan kaedah pengagregatan keutamaan) , 2012 .

[20]  R. Phillips,et al.  Pipeline Routing and Burial Depth Analysis Using GIS Software , 2011 .

[21]  Mahmoud Reza Delavar,et al.  Routing Using Geospatial Information System Analysis , 2003, ScanGIS.

[22]  Abdul-Lateef Balogun,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria decision support system for evaluating subsea oil pipeline routing criteria in East Malaysia , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[23]  D. Ahl,et al.  A prototype for pipeline routing using remotely sensed data and geographic information system analysis , 1995 .

[24]  K. S. Kumar,et al.  Artificial Groundwater Recharge Zones Mapping Using Remote Sensing and GIS: A Case Study in Indian Punjab , 2013, Environmental Management.

[25]  Steven Fischer,et al.  US national mapping system growing, adjusting to security concerns , 2001 .

[26]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Decision support system for pipeline route selection , 1999 .

[27]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How Many Judges Should There Be in a Group ? , 2014 .

[28]  Maryam Kordi,et al.  Effects of increasing fuzziness on analytic hierarchy process for spatial multicriteria decision analysis , 2012, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[29]  R. Ramanathan,et al.  Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages , 1994 .

[30]  Hui Yieng Lee,et al.  Suitability Analysis of Subsea Pipeline Route using GIS , 2008 .

[31]  V. Yildirim,et al.  GIS Based Pipeline Route Selection by ArcGIS in Turkey , 2007 .

[32]  Scott Byron.  Risk-based pipeline routing improves success probabitity , 2010 .

[33]  J. Martel,et al.  Enhancing Geographical Information Systems Capabilities with Multi-Criteria Evaluation Functions , 2003 .

[34]  David Bailey,et al.  Development of an optimal spatial decision-making system using approximate reasoning , 2005 .

[35]  Kirti Peniwati,et al.  Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  C. R. Bector,et al.  Fuzzy Mathematical Programming and Fuzzy Matrix Games , 2005 .