Migration of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts on Nanometric Topographical Patterns: Influence of Filopodia and Focal Adhesions on Contact Guidance

Considered to be the “holy grail” of dentistry, regeneration of the periodontal ligament in humans remains a major clinical problem. Removal of bacterial biofilms is commonly achieved using EDTA gels or lasers. One side effect of these treatment regimens is the etching of nanotopographies on the surface of the tooth. However, the response of periodontal ligament fibroblasts to such features has received very little attention. Using laser interference lithography, we fabricated precisely defined topographies with continuous or discontinuous nanogrooves to assess the adhesion, spreading and migration of PDL fibroblasts. PDL fibroblasts adhered to and spread on all tested surfaces, with initial spreading and focal adhesion formation slower on discontinuous nanogrooves. Cells had a significantly smaller planar area on both continuous and discontinuous nanogrooves in comparison with cells on non-patterned controls. At 24 h post seeding, cells on both types of nanogrooves were highly elongated parallel to the groove long axis. Time-lapse video microscopy revealed that PDL fibroblast movement was guided on both types of grooves, but migration velocity was not significantly different from cells cultured on non-patterned controls. Analysis of filopodia formation using time-lapse video microscopy and labeling of vinculin and F-actin revealed that on nanogrooves, filopodia were highly aligned at both ends of the cell, but with increasing time filopodia and membrane protrusions developed at the side of the cell perpendicular to the cell long axis. We conclude that periodontal ligament fibroblasts are sensitive to nanotopographical depths of 85–100 µm, which could be utilized in regeneration of the periodontal ligament.

[1]  P. Layrolle,et al.  Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Microfabricated Discontinuous-Edge Surface Topographies Influence Osteoblast Adhesion, Migration, Cytoskeletal Organization, and Proliferation and Enhance Matrix and Mineral Deposition In Vitro , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[3]  G. Garlet,et al.  Opposite effects of bFGF and TGF-beta on collagen metabolism by human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. , 2007, Cytokine.

[4]  Douglas W Hamilton,et al.  Comparative response of epithelial cells and osteoblasts to microfabricated tapered pit topographies in vitro and in vivo. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[5]  H. Burt,et al.  A PLGA membrane controlling cell behaviour for promoting tissue regeneration. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[6]  D. Hamilton,et al.  The effect of substratum topography on osteoblast adhesion mediated signal transduction and phosphorylation. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[7]  P. Connolly,et al.  Advantages of using microfabricated extracellular electrodes for in vitro neuronal recording , 1995, Journal of neuroscience research.

[8]  J. Blomlöf Root cementum appearance in healthy monkeys and periodontitis-prone patients after different etching modalities. , 1996, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[9]  S. Affrossman,et al.  Cell response to nano-islands produced by polymer demixing: a brief review. , 2004, IEE proceedings. Nanobiotechnology.

[10]  A. Aoki,et al.  In vivo effects of an Er:YAG Laser, an ultrasonic system and scaling and root planing on the biocompatibility of periodontally diseased root surfaces in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts , 2003, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[11]  A. Curtis,et al.  The response of primary articular chondrocytes to micrometric surface topography and sulphated hyaluronic acid‐based matrices , 2005, Cell biology international.

[12]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Modulation of human gingival fibroblast adhesion, morphology, tyrosine phosphorylation, and ERK 1/2 localization on polished, grooved and SLA substratum topographies. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[13]  R. Baier,et al.  Implant surface preparation. , 1988, The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants.

[14]  D. Brunette,et al.  The effects of micromachined surfaces on formation of bonelike tissue on subcutaneous implants as assessed by radiography and computer image processing. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  R. Cohen,et al.  The effect of root modification and biomodification on periodontal therapy. , 2003, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[16]  A. Curtis,et al.  Articular chondrocyte passage number: Influence on adhesion, migration, cytoskeletal organisation and phenotype in response to nano‐ and micro‐metric topography , 2005, Cell biology international.

[17]  J. Albandar Epidemiology and risk factors of periodontal diseases. , 2005, Dental clinics of North America.

[18]  A. Curtis,et al.  Nonadhesive nanotopography: fibroblast response to poly(n-butyl methacrylate)-poly(styrene) demixed surface features. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[19]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[20]  D. Hamilton,et al.  "Gap guidance" of fibroblasts and epithelial cells by discontinuous edged surfaces. , 2005, Experimental cell research.

[21]  J. Jansen,et al.  Periodontal ligament and gingival fibroblast adhesion to dentin-like textured surfaces. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[22]  S. Lindskog,et al.  Root surface etching at neutral pH promotes periodontal healing. , 1996, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[23]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Reactions of cells to topography. , 1998, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[24]  J. Fiorellini,et al.  Regenerative periodontal therapy. , 2012, Frontiers of oral biology.

[25]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10 nm high nano‐topography and fibroblast filopodia , 2004, Cell biology international.

[26]  C. Drisko,et al.  Scaling and root planing: removal of calculus and subgingival organisms. , 1991, Current opinion in dentistry.

[27]  J. Jansen,et al.  The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[28]  C. Oakley,et al.  Topographic compensation: guidance and directed locomotion of fibroblasts on grooved micromachined substrata in the absence of microtubules. , 1995, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[29]  W. Ketterl [Periodontal diseases]. , 1971, Der Zahnarzt; Colloquium med. dent.

[30]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Investigating filopodia sensing using arrays of defined nano-pits down to 35 nm diameter in size. , 2004, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[31]  Lyndon F Cooper,et al.  Advancing dental implant surface technology--from micron- to nanotopography. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[32]  J. Jansen,et al.  Contact guidance of rat fibroblasts on various implant materials. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[33]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  The effect of environmental factors on the response of human corneal epithelial cells to nanoscale substrate topography. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[34]  J. Davies,et al.  Mechanisms of endosseous integration. , 1998, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[35]  P. Ohara,et al.  Contact guidance in vitro. A light, transmission, and scanning electron microscopic study. , 1979, Experimental cell research.

[36]  Janos Vörös,et al.  Systematic study of osteoblast response to nanotopography by means of nanoparticle-density gradients. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[37]  M. Riehle,et al.  Interaction of animal cells with ordered nanotopography. , 2002, IEEE transactions on nanobioscience.

[38]  B. Boyan,et al.  Mechanisms of alveolar bone destruction in periodontitis. , 1997, Periodontology 2000.

[39]  A. Gamal,et al.  The effects of EDTA gel conditioning exposure time on periodontitis-affected human root surfaces: surface topography and PDL cell adhesion. , 2003, Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology.

[40]  D. Brunette,et al.  Substratum surface topography alters cell shape and regulates fibronectin mRNA level, mRNA stability, secretion and assembly in human fibroblasts. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[41]  A. Molenberg,et al.  The effect of enamel matrix proteins on the spreading, proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[42]  N. Babay The effect of EDTA on the attachment and growth of cultured human gingival fibroblasts in periodontitis-affected root surface. , 2001, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[43]  A. Sculean,et al.  Human histologic evaluation of an intrabony defect treated with enamel matrix derivative, xenograft, and GTR. , 2004, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[44]  C. Murphy,et al.  Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[45]  N. Babay Comparative SEM study on the effect of root conditioning with EDTA or tetracycline Hcl on periodontally involved root surfaces. , 2000, Indian Journal of Dental Research.