Heart-rate and electrodermal orienting responses to visual stimuli differing in complexity.

Orienting response (OR) theory predicts that amount of information in the stimulus, or stimulus complexity, should be an important determinant of OR elicitation and habituation, more intense and more slowly habituating ORs being expected to complex than to simple stimuli. This prediction was tested in an experiment where subjects were exposed to simple and complex visual stimuli in randomized order, while heart-rate and skin conductance were measured. Complex stimuli evoked a more pronounced deceleratory heartrate response than did simple stimuli. However, the two conditions did not differ in rate of habituation of this response. For skin conductance responses, on the other hand, the complex stimulus took more trials than the simple stimulus to reach habituation, whereas the two conditions did not differ in response magnitude. Thus, the hypothesis of more intense orienting to complex stimuli was supported by the heart-rate data, and that of slower habituation to complex stimuli, of the skin conductance data.

[1]  J. Jackson Amplitude and habituation of the orienting reflex as a function of stimulus intensity. , 1974, Psychophysiology.

[2]  J. O’gorman,et al.  Habituation of the orienting reaction as a function of stimulus information , 1971 .

[3]  R K Clifton,et al.  Heart-rate change as a component of the orienting response. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  A. Ohman,et al.  Orienting and defensive responding in the electrodermal system: palmar-dorsal differences and recovery rate during conditioning to potentially phobic stimuli. , 1978, Psychophysiology.

[5]  D. Berlyne The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  D. Lykken,et al.  Range correction applied to heart rate and to GSR data. , 1972, Psychophysiology.

[7]  G. Prigatano,et al.  Autonomic nervous system changes associated with a spider phobic reaction. , 1974, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[8]  M. Fredrikson,et al.  Locus of control and habituation of the electrodermal orienting response to nonsignal and signal stimuli. , 1977 .

[9]  P. Lang,et al.  Accuracy of psychophysical judgments and physiological response amplitude. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  D. Berlyne,et al.  EFFECTS OF STIMULUS COMPLEXITY AND INCONGRUITY ON DURATION OF EEG DESYNCHRONIZATION. , 1965, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  D. Siddle,et al.  Effects of stimulus information and stimulus duration on amplitude and habituation of the electrodermal orienting response , 1976, Biological Psychology.

[12]  J. Lewis,et al.  NOVELTY, COMPLEXITY, INCONGRUITY, EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION, AND THE GSR. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.