Validation of a Novel Software Tool for Automatic Aortic Annular Sizing in Three‐Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiographic Images

Background: Accurate aortic annulus (AoA) sizing is crucial for transcatheter aortic valve implantation planning. Three‐dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a viable alternative to the standard multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) for such assessment, with few automatic software solutions available. The aim of this study was to present and evaluate a novel software tool for automatic AoA sizing by 3D TEE. Methods: One hundred one patients who underwent both preoperative MDCT and 3D TEE were retrospectively analyzed using the software. The automatic software measurements' accuracy was compared against values obtained using standard manual MDCT, as well as against those obtained using manual 3D TEE, and intraobserver, interobserver, and test‐retest reproducibility was assessed. Because the software can be used as a fully automatic or as an interactive tool, both options were addressed and contrasted. The impact of these measures on the recommended prosthesis size was then evaluated to assess if the software's automated sizes were concordant with those obtained using an MDCT‐ or a TEE‐based manual sizing strategy. Results: The software showed very good agreement with manual values obtained using MDCT and 3D TEE, with the interactive approach having slightly narrower limits of agreement. The latter also had excellent intra‐ and interobserver variability. Both fully automatic and interactive analyses showed excellent test‐retest reproducibility, with the first having a faster analysis time. Finally, either approach led to good sizing agreement against the true implanted sizes (>77%) and against MDCT‐based sizes (>88%). Conclusions: Given the automated, reproducible, and fast nature of its analyses, the novel software tool presented here may potentially facilitate and thus increase the use of 3D TEE for preoperative transcatheter aortic valve implantation sizing. Graphical abstract: Figure. No caption available. HighlightsAccurate AoA sizing is crucial for preoperative TAVI planning.A novel software tool for automatic AoA sizing by 3D TEE is presented.The software measurements were validated against standard manual MDCT values.It showed very good to excellent agreement with MDCT, being highly reproducible.This software may potentially facilitate the use of 3D TEE for preoperative TAVI sizing.

[1]  J. Leipsic,et al.  A practical guide to multimodality imaging of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  C. Hengstenberg,et al.  Prosthesis sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation--comparison of three dimensional transesophageal echocardiography with multislice computed tomography. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[3]  Mark J Monaghan,et al.  Recommendations for comprehensive intraprocedural echocardiographic imaging during TAVR. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[4]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Influence of the Quantity of Aortic Valve Calcium on the Agreement Between Automated 3-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography and Multidetector Row Computed Tomography for Aortic Annulus Sizing. , 2018, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  Paul Schoenhagen,et al.  Manual, semiautomated, and fully automated measurement of the aortic annulus for planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR/TAVI): analysis of interchangeability. , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[6]  A. Papachristidis,et al.  Three-Dimensional Measurement of Aortic Annulus Dimensions Using Area or Circumference for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Valve Sizing: Does It Make a Difference? , 2017, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[7]  S. Nitzsche,et al.  CT evaluation prior to transapical aortic valve replacement: semi-automatic versus manual image segmentation , 2015, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[8]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). , 2012, European heart journal.

[9]  T. Nazif,et al.  Impact of Methodologic Differences in Three‐Dimensional Echocardiographic Measurements of the Aortic Annulus Compared with Computed Tomographic Angiography Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , 2017, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[10]  S. Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  T. Ryan,et al.  Automated Quantitative 3-Dimensional Modeling of the Aortic Valve and Root by 3-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in Normals, Aortic Regurgitation, and Aortic Stenosis: Comparison to Computed Tomography in Normals and Clinical Implications , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[12]  Patrizio Lancellotti,et al.  The use of imaging in new transcatheter interventions: an EACVI review paper. , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[13]  T. Komiya,et al.  Accuracy of Aortic Annulus Diameter Measurement: Comparison of Multi‐Detector CT, Two‐ and Three‐Dimensional Echocardiography , 2016, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[14]  Martin B. Leon,et al.  Aortic Annular Sizing Using a Novel 3-Dimensional Echocardiographic Method: Use and Comparison With Cardiac Computed Tomography , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[15]  M. Monaghan,et al.  How to assess aortic annular size before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): the role of echocardiography compared with other imaging modalities , 2014, Heart.

[16]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Automated assessment of the aortic root dimensions with multidetector row computed tomography. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  M. Mack,et al.  Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Adnan Kastrati,et al.  Standardized imaging for aortic annular sizing: implications for transcatheter valve selection. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[19]  Amit R. Patel,et al.  3D echocardiographic analysis of aortic annulus for transcatheter aortic valve replacement using novel aortic valve quantification software: Comparison with computed tomography , 2017, Echocardiography.

[20]  Denis Friboulet,et al.  Real-time 3D interactive segmentation of echocardiographic data through user-based deformation of B-spline explicit active surfaces , 2014, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[21]  Jan D’hooge,et al.  Fully Automatic 3-D-TEE Segmentation for the Planning of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  J. Webb,et al.  The transcatheter valve technology pipeline for treatment of adult valvular heart disease. , 2016, European heart journal.

[23]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Feasibility, Accuracy, and Reproducibility of Aortic Annular and Root Sizing for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using Novel Automated Three‐Dimensional Echocardiographic Software: Comparison with Multi–Detector Row Computed Tomography , 2017, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[24]  Jan D'hooge,et al.  Automatic 3D aortic annulus sizing by computed tomography in the planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[25]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Comparison of Aortic Root Dimensions and Geometries Before and After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation by 2- and 3-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography and Multislice Computed Tomography , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[26]  Frederik Maes,et al.  Three-Dimensional Cardiac Motion Estimation Based on Non-rigid Image Registration Using a Novel Transformation Model Adapted to the Heart , 2012, STACOM.

[27]  Raimund Erbel,et al.  Open issues in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Part 1: patient selection and treatment strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2014, European heart journal.

[28]  Haruhiko Abe,et al.  Aortic root geometry in patients with aortic stenosis assessed by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. , 2014, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[29]  L. Sugeng,et al.  Assessment of the aortic root using real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography. , 2010, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[30]  Jan D'hooge,et al.  Aortic Valve Tract Segmentation From 3D-TEE Using Shape-Based B-Spline Explicit Active Surfaces , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  S. Achenbach,et al.  SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[32]  Nicolo Piazza,et al.  Three-dimensional echocardiography vs. computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement sizing. , 2015, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.