Changes in lumbar lordosis and predicted minimum 5-year surgical outcomes after short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Ohtori | M. Inoue | K. Inage | S. Orita | Y. Eguchi | Yasuhiro Shiga | G. Kubota | K. Nakagawa | Y. Aoki | Shuhei Ohyama | T. Nakajima | Yusuke Sato | Hiroshi Takahashi | Masashi Sato | A. Nakajima | M. Sonobe | Satoshi Yoh | F. Terajima | J. Saito | M. Norimoto
[1] S. Ohtori,et al. Effects of the difference between lumbar lordosis in the supine and standing positions on the clinical outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2021, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.
[2] D. K. Hamilton,et al. Lateral Thoracolumbar Listhesis as an Independent Predictor of Disability in Adult Scoliosis Patients: Multivariable Assessment Before and After Surgical Realignment , 2021, Neurosurgery.
[3] S. Ohtori,et al. Influence of Preoperative Difference in Lumbar Lordosis Between the Standing and Supine Positions on Clinical Outcomes After Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. , 2021, Spine.
[4] Hiroyuki Ishiguro,et al. Adjacent-segment disease after L3-4 posterior lumbar interbody fusion: does L3-4 fusion have cranial adjacent-segment degeneration similar to that after L4-5 fusion? , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.
[5] Shuangjun He,et al. Analysis of Spinopelvic Sagittal Balance and Persistent Low Back Pain (PLBP) for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (DS) following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) , 2020, Pain research & management.
[6] R. Vengust,et al. Failure to maintain segmental lordosis during TLIF for one-level degenerative spondylolisthesis negatively affects clinical outcome 5 years postoperatively: a prospective cohort of 57 patients , 2019, European Spine Journal.
[7] K. Hasegawa,et al. Difference in whole spinal alignment between supine and standing positions in patients with adult spinal deformity using a new comparison method with slot-scanning three-dimensional X-ray imager and computed tomography through digital reconstructed radiography , 2018, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
[8] H. Bouloussa,et al. Influence of posture on relationships between pelvic parameters and lumbar lordosis: Comparison of the standing, seated, and supine positions. A preliminary study. , 2018, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.
[9] M. Zhuang,et al. Surgical Outcomes of Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With and Without Kyphotic Alignment. , 2018, World neurosurgery.
[10] Na-xin Fu,et al. Sagittal Alignment as Predictor of Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion. , 2017, World neurosurgery.
[11] Y. Li,et al. Effect of Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease. , 2018, World neurosurgery.
[12] Dai-Soon Kwak,et al. Changes of spinopelvic parameters in different positions , 2017, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.
[13] E. Benzel,et al. Pelvic retroversion: a compensatory mechanism for lumbar stenosis. , 2017, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.
[14] Yue-Fang Chang,et al. The Influence of Pelvic Incidence and Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch on Development of Symptomatic Adjacent Level Disease Following Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 2017, Neurosurgery.
[15] F. Schwab,et al. When is compensation for lumbar spinal stenosis a clinical sagittal plane deformity? , 2016, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.
[16] W. Ding,et al. Radiographic Restoration of Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis , 2014, Clinical spine surgery.
[17] S. Ohtori,et al. Retrospective exploration of risk factors for L5 radiculopathy following lumbar floating fusion surgery , 2015, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.
[18] S. Ohtori,et al. Influence of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch on surgical outcomes of short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion , 2015, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
[19] N. Hamajima,et al. Adjacent Segment Disease After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Based on Cases With a Minimum of 10 Years of Follow-up , 2015, Spine.
[20] Oheneba Boachie-Adjei,et al. Radiographical Spinopelvic Parameters and Disability in the Setting of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Prospective Multicenter Analysis , 2013, Spine.
[21] S. Ohtori,et al. Evaluation of Nonspecific Low Back Pain Using a New Detailed Visual Analogue Scale for Patients in Motion, Standing, and Sitting: Characterizing Nonspecific Low Back Pain in Elderly Patients , 2012, Pain research and treatment.
[22] S. Ohtori,et al. A prospective randomized controlled study comparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques for degenerative spondylolisthesis: unilateral pedicle screw and 1 cage versus bilateral pedicle screws and 2 cages. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.
[23] T. Witham,et al. Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity , 2011, Neurological research.
[24] T. Smoljanović,et al. Six-year outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis with use of interbody fusion cages and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[25] Takahiro Tsutsumimoto,et al. Mini-Open Versus Conventional Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Comparison of Paraspinal Muscle Damage and Slip Reduction , 2009, Spine.
[26] Ashish Patel,et al. Sagittal Plane Considerations and the Pelvis in the Adult Patient , 2009, Spine.
[27] James Deddens,et al. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Nonresorbable Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone Versus Resorbable Poly-l-Lactide-Co-d,l-Lactide Fusion Devices: A Prospective, Randomized Study to Assess Fusion and Clinical Outcome , 2009, Spine.
[28] Paul Park,et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. , 2008, Neurosurgical focus.
[29] A. Nowakowski,et al. [Management of cervical and lumbar stenosis]. , 2007, Chirurgia narzadow ruchu i ortopedia polska.
[30] H. Halm,et al. Clinical and Radiologic 2—4-Year Results of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative and Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2 , 2006, Spine.
[31] K. Kaneda,et al. Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and bilateral anterior-column fixation with two Brantigan I/F cages per level: clinical outcomes during a minimum 2-year follow-up period. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.
[32] K. Kagechika,et al. Changes in Epidural Pressure During Walking in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1995, Spine.
[33] O. Nakai,et al. Long-term roentgenographic and functional changes in patients who were treated with wide fenestration for central lumbar stenosis. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[34] J. Harms,et al. [A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author's transl)]. , 2008, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.