Processing and Reliability of Solder Interconnections in Stacked Packaging

Three-dimensional (3D) packaging, whether stacked die or stacked packages, has been a critical enabler in the further miniaturization and increased functionality of hand-held, consumer electronics. Similarly, reducing the size, weight, and power (SWaP) requirements of high-reliability electronics is an omnipresent goal of the military, space, and satellite communities. Yet, there remains to be an information gap with respect to the long-term performance of 3D packaging in high-reliability electronics that has not been sufficiently addressed by the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) of consumer products. This chapter helps to fill this gap by highlighting the materials, processes, and growing reliability database of the stacked-package variant within 3D technology. Emphasis is placed on the solder interconnections used to assemble individual packages together as well as the second-level interconnections made between the stacked package and the printed circuit board (PCB). After a brief description of the seemingly divergent reliability requirements between consumer and high-reliability electronics, the discussion turns to the materials and soldering processes used in the assembly of the two common stacked packaging formats—package-on-package (PoP) and package-on-package-on-package (PoPoP). The next section examines solder joint reliability, including service conditions versus accelerated aging tests as well as the impacts of encapsulants and underfills on the long-term performance of PoP and PoPoP interconnections. Particular attention is given to computational modeling that will most certainly be a required toolset for predicting the solder joint reliability of these complex structures. Concluding remarks address the future trends of stacked packages and their potential to significantly enhance the functionality of high-reliability systems while also reducing SWaP.

[1]  M. Yim,et al.  Effects of material properties on PoP top package warpage behaviors , 2010, 2010 Proceedings 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC).

[2]  DongKil Shin,et al.  Development of multi stack package with high drop reliability by experimental and numerical methods , 2006, 56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2006.

[3]  Jeffrey C. Suhling,et al.  Thermal Aging Effects on the Thermal Cycling Reliability of Lead-Free Fine Pitch Packages , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology.

[4]  Yuxiang Luo,et al.  Effects of package design on top PoP package warpage , 2008, 2008 58th Electronic Components and Technology Conference.

[5]  Michael Osterman,et al.  Reliability Evaluation of One-Pass and Two-Pass Techniques of Assembly for Package on Packages under Torsion Loads , 2010 .

[6]  K. Ishibashi,et al.  High Density PoP (Package-on-Package) and Package Stacking Development , 2007, 2007 Proceedings 57th Electronic Components and Technology Conference.

[7]  Lin Jia-y,et al.  Road vehicles-Environmental conditions and testing for electrical and electronic equipment Part 3:Mechanical loads(ISO 16750-3:2003) , 2007 .

[8]  A. Burton,et al.  Development of a high reliability and large volume manufacturing assembly process for a stacked memory package , 2004, 2004 Proceedings. 54th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37546).

[9]  Jing-en Luan,et al.  Effect of unfilled underfills on drop impact reliability performance of area array packages , 2006, 56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2006.

[10]  A. Yoshida,et al.  A study on package stacking process for package-on-package (PoP) , 2006, 56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2006.

[11]  V. Wang,et al.  Analysis of the reliability of package-on-package devices manufactured using various underfill methods , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology & High Density Packaging.