Field Study of Hydrogeologic Characterization Methods in a Heterogeneous Aquifer
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Brian R. Zurbuchen,et al. Support volume and scale effect in hydraulic conductivity: Experimental aspects , 2000 .
[2] Junfeng Zhu,et al. Laboratory sandbox validation of transient hydraulic tomography , 2007 .
[3] Dirk Schulze-Makuch,et al. Variations in hydraulic conductivity with scale of measurement during aquifer tests in heterogeneous, porous carbonate rocks , 1998 .
[4] Brian R. Zurbuchen,et al. Field study of hydraulic conductivity in a heterogeneous aquifer: Comparison of single‐borehole measurements using different instruments , 2003 .
[5] S. P. Neuman,et al. Type curve interpretation of a cross‐hole pneumatic injection test in unsaturated fractured tuff , 2001 .
[6] M. S. Hantush. Modification of the theory of leaky aquifers , 1960 .
[7] W. Illman. Strong field evidence of directional permeability scale effect in fractured rock , 2006 .
[8] Peter Dietrich,et al. A travel time based hydraulic tomographic approach , 2003 .
[9] A Revil,et al. A Potential‐Based Inversion of Unconfined Steady‐State Hydraulic Tomography , 2009, Ground water.
[10] Russell G. Shepherd,et al. Correlations of Permeability and Grain Size , 1989 .
[11] C. V. Theis. The relation between the lowering of the Piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground‐water storage , 1935 .
[12] Peter Dietrich,et al. Identification of the permeability distribution in soil by hydraulic tomography , 1995 .
[13] R. Silberstein,et al. The sensitivity of a catchment model to soil hydraulic properties obtained by using different measurement techniques , 1999 .
[14] Steven H. Wolf,et al. Evaluation of Hydraulic Conductivities Calculated from Multiport‐Permeameter Measurements , 1991 .
[15] Walter A. Illman,et al. Hydraulic tomography using temporal moments of drawdown recovery data: A laboratory sandbox study , 2007 .
[16] S. P. Neuman,et al. Steady-state analysis of cross-hole pneumatic injection tests in unsaturated fractured tuff , 2003 .
[17] T. Yeh,et al. Analysis of hydraulic tomography using temporal moments of drawdown recovery data , 2006 .
[18] Alexandre Boucher,et al. Applied Geostatistics with SGeMS: A User's Guide , 2009 .
[19] E. Sudicky. A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process , 1986 .
[20] Junfeng Zhu,et al. Sequential aquifer tests at a well field, Montalto Uffugo Scalo, Italy , 2007 .
[21] Brent Clothier,et al. A COMPARISON OF THREE FIELD METHODS FOR MEASURING SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY , 1985 .
[22] Donald R. F. Harleman,et al. Dispersion-Permeability Correlation in Porous Media , 1963 .
[23] James J. Butler,et al. Hydrogeological Methods for Estimation of Spatial Variations in Hydraulic Conductivity , 2005 .
[24] Tian-Chyi J. Yeh,et al. Characterization of aquifer heterogeneity using transient hydraulic tomography , 2004 .
[25] D. Hillel,et al. COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ASSESSING SOIL HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES , 1993 .
[26] T. Yeh,et al. Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method , 2000 .
[27] J. Carrera,et al. A discussion of scale effects on hydraulic conductivity at a granitic site (El Berrocal, Spain) , 1995 .
[28] Junfeng Zhu,et al. Comparison of aquifer characterization approaches through steady state groundwater model validation: A controlled laboratory sandbox study , 2010 .
[29] James J. Butler,et al. Steady shape analysis of tomographic pumping tests for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities , 2002 .
[30] Vedat Batu. Aquifer Hydraulics: A Comprehensive Guide to Hydrogeologic Data Analysis , 1998 .
[31] Arturo A. Keller,et al. A stochastic analysis of steady state two‐phase flow in heterogeneous media , 2005 .
[32] I. White. Comment on “A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process” by E. A. Sudicky , 1988 .
[33] D. Cherkauer,et al. Scale Dependency of Hydraulic Conductivity Measurements , 1995 .
[34] Ramesh S. Kanwar,et al. Comparison of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Measurement Methods for a Glacial-Till Soil , 1994 .
[35] Reply [to Comment on A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: Spatial , 1988 .
[36] Walter A. Illman,et al. Heterogeneity in hydraulic conductivity and its role on the macroscale transport of a solute plume: From measurements to a practical application of stochastic flow and transport theory , 2010 .
[37] Jesús Carrera,et al. An analysis of hydraulic conductivity scale effects in granite (Full‐scale Engineered Barrier Experiment (FEBEX), Grimsel, Switzerland) , 2005 .
[38] J. Maréchal,et al. Use of hydraulic tests at different scales to characterize fracture network properties in the weathered‐fractured layer of a hard rock aquifer , 2004 .
[39] Walter A Illman,et al. Practical Issues in Imaging Hydraulic Conductivity through Hydraulic Tomography , 2008, Ground water.
[40] Junfeng Zhu,et al. Traditional analysis of aquifer tests: Comparing apples to oranges? , 2005 .
[41] D. W. Scott. On optimal and data based histograms , 1979 .
[42] Guk-Rwang Won. American Society for Testing and Materials , 1987 .
[43] E. Eric Adams,et al. Field study of dispersion in a heterogeneous aquifer , 1992 .
[44] A. Bellin,et al. A Bayesian approach for inversion of hydraulic tomographic data , 2009 .
[45] Allan D. Woodbury,et al. The geostatistical characteristics of the borden aquifer , 1991 .
[46] G. Fogg,et al. Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics , 1996 .
[47] Walter A. Illman,et al. Steady-state hydraulic tomography in a laboratory aquifer with deterministic heterogeneity: Multi-method and multiscale validation of hydraulic conductivity tomograms , 2007 .
[48] R. Kodešová,et al. Comparison of soil hydraulic property measurement methods , 2004 .
[49] Giuseppe Provenzano,et al. Factors Affecting Field and Laboratory Measurement of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity , 1996 .
[50] James J. Butler,et al. Relationship Between Pumping‐Test and Slug‐Test Parameters: Scale Effect or Artifact? , 1998 .
[51] Diane M. McKnight,et al. Transport and cycling of iron and hydrogen peroxide in a freshwater stream: Influence of organic acids , 2003 .
[52] S. P. Neuman,et al. Three‐dimensional numerical inversion of pneumatic cross‐hole tests in unsaturated fractured tuff: 2. Equivalent parameters, high‐resolution stochastic imaging and scale effects , 2001 .
[53] J. J. Butler,et al. The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests , 1997 .
[54] Steven F. Carle,et al. Three‐dimensional hydrofacies modeling based on soil surveys and transition probability geostatistics , 1999 .
[55] Marco Bianchi,et al. SGeMS: A Free and Versatile Tool for Three‐Dimensional Geostatistical Applications , 2009 .
[56] Jet-Chau Wen,et al. A simultaneous successive linear estimator and a guide for hydraulic tomography analysis , 2009 .
[57] Geoffrey C. Bohling,et al. A field assessment of the value of steady shape hydraulic tomography for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities , 2007 .
[58] F. Massey. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit , 1951 .
[59] J. H. Dane,et al. Physical and Mineralogical Data to Determine Soil Hydraulic Properties , 1985 .
[60] S. P. Neuman,et al. Field Determination of the Three-Dimensional Hydraulic Conductivity Tensor of Anisotropic Media: 2. Methodology and Application to Fractured Rocks , 1985 .