Robust continuous speed governor control for small-signal and transient stability

A robust continuous governor control for small-signal and transient stability is proposed. The turbine under consideration is a steam turbine with two sections and is of the reheat type. The controller can be viewed as including the speed droop governor and the fast-valving; the latter is not standard, in that it generates a continuous control. Hence, the disadvantages of the (usual) bang-bang fast-valving are avoided. The control signal is generated by two controllers, with the first one for small disturbances and the second one for large disturbances. Our approach is innovative in that both controllers have the same structure and only differ in the tuning of their parameters. They generate a continuous control and are switched with a bumpless transition to ensure the continuity of the overall control. The most important nonlinearity of the turbine is taken into account, and a feedback linearization is made-but in a somewhat unusual manner to obtain a robust controller. A linear quadratic control is also used to ensure that the steady-state objectives are met and that good transients are obtained. Simulations with the EUROSTAG software show improved efficiency with the proposed controller compared with the current one, especially in the case of a short-circuit, an islanding or a temporary loss of synchronism of the machine considered; the current controller has a standard structure, including a bang-bang fast-valving.

[1]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Computer-Controlled Systems: Theory and Design , 1984 .

[2]  T. J. Hammons Impact of Shaft Torsionals in Steam Turbine Control , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[3]  P. A. W. Walker,et al.  Co-Ordinated Self-Tuning Control for Turbine and Exciter of a Turboalternator , 1988 .

[4]  Henri Bourlès,et al.  W-stability and local input-output stability results , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[5]  Ieee Report,et al.  Dynamic Models for Steam and Hydro Turbines in Power System Studies , 1973 .

[6]  M. P. Houry,et al.  A desensitized controller for voltage regulation of power systems , 1995 .

[7]  H. Bourles Stabilité des systèmes linéaires perturbés: robustesse , 1984 .

[8]  N. B. Bhatt Field experience with momentary fast turbine valving and other special stability controls employed at AEP's Rockport plant , 1996 .

[9]  H. Bourles,et al.  Robust controller with local linearizing feedback for frequency/power control of power plants , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Jin Jiang Design of an optimal robust governor for hydraulic turbine generating units , 1995 .

[11]  A. R. Daniels,et al.  Co-ordinated single-variable excitation control and governing of turboalternators , 1982 .

[12]  Marija D. Ilic,et al.  Feedback linearizing excitation control on a full-scale power system model , 1994 .

[13]  Adel A. Ghandakly,et al.  Design of a model reference adaptive stabilizer for the exciter and governor loops of power generators , 1990 .

[14]  Michael Athans,et al.  Gain and phase margin for multiloop LQG regulators , 1976, 1976 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 15th Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[15]  P. Kundur,et al.  Impact of Turbine Generator Overspeed Controls on Unit Performance Under System Disturbance Conditions , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[16]  David J. Hill,et al.  Transient stability enhancement and voltage regulation of power systems , 1993 .