In Silico Toxicology in Drug Discovery — Concepts Based on Three-dimensional Models

Animal testing is still compulsory worldwide, for the approval of drugs and chemicals produced in large quantities. Computer-assisted (in silico) technologies are considered to be efficient alternatives to in vivo experiments, and are therefore endorsed by many regulatory agencies, e.g. for use in the European REACH initiative. Advantages of in silico methods include: the possible study of hypothetical compounds; their low cost; and the fact that such virtual experiments are typically based on human data, thus making the question of interspecies transferability obsolete. Since the mid-1990s, computer-based technologies have become an indispensable tool in drug discovery — used primarily to identify small molecules displaying a stereospecific and selective binding to a regulatory macromolecule. Since toxic effects are still responsible for some 20% of the late-stage failures, there is a continuing need for in silico concepts which can be used to estimate a compound's ADMET (adsorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination, toxicity) properties — in particular, toxicity. The aim of this paper is to provide an insight into computational technologies that allow for the prediction of toxic effects triggered by pharmaceuticals. As most adverse and toxic effects are mediated by unwanted interactions with macromolecules involved in biological regulatory systems, we have focused on methodologies that are based on three-dimensional models of small molecules binding to such entities, and discuss the results at the molecular level.

[1]  A. Vedani,et al.  Mixed‐Model QSAR at the Glucocorticoid Receptor: Predicting the Binding Mode and Affinity of Psychotropic Drugs , 2009, ChemMedChem.

[2]  Markus A Lill,et al.  Impact of induced fit on ligand binding to the androgen receptor: a multidimensional QSAR study to predict endocrine-disrupting effects of environmental chemicals. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  Andrew A. Rooney,et al.  Organization versus activation: the role of endocrine-disrupting contaminants (EDCs) during embryonic development in wildlife. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[4]  Florian Nigsch,et al.  Computational toxicology: an overview of the sources of data and of modelling methods , 2009, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[5]  Sebastian Hoffmann,et al.  Food for thought ... on in silico methods in toxicology. , 2009, ALTEX.

[6]  J D Dunitz,et al.  Win some, lose some: enthalpy-entropy compensation in weak intermolecular interactions. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.

[7]  Wolfgang Muster,et al.  Computational toxicology in drug development. , 2008, Drug discovery today.

[8]  R. Friesner,et al.  New insights about HERG blockade obtained from protein modeling, potential energy mapping, and docking studies. , 2006, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[9]  J. Dunitz The entropic cost of bound water in crystals and biomolecules. , 1994, Science.

[10]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Kernels for small molecules and the prediction of mutagenicity, toxicity and anti-cancer activity , 2005, ISMB.

[11]  A. Bender,et al.  Analysis of Pharmacology Data and the Prediction of Adverse Drug Reactions and Off‐Target Effects from Chemical Structure , 2007, ChemMedChem.

[12]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[13]  Sean Ekins,et al.  Computational prediction of human drug metabolism , 2005, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[14]  S. Ekins Applications of QSAR to Enzymes Involved in Toxicology , 2006 .

[15]  I. Poggesi,et al.  Computational approaches for predicting CYP-related metabolism properties in the screening of new drugs. , 2006, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[16]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Computational toxicology--a state of the science mini review. , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[17]  G Klebe,et al.  Energetic and entropic factors determining binding affinity in protein-ligand complexes. , 1997, Journal of receptor and signal transduction research.

[18]  A. Hopfinger,et al.  Construction of 3D-QSAR Models Using the 4D-QSAR Analysis Formalism , 1997 .

[19]  Chris de Graaf,et al.  Cytochrome p450 in silico: an integrative modeling approach. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[20]  E. Benfenati,et al.  Ecotoxicity prediction by adaptive fuzzy partitioning: comparing descriptors computed on 2D and 3D structures , 2006, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[21]  Ovanes Mekenyan,et al.  Correction to Identification of the Structural Requirements for Mutagencity, by Incorporating Molecular Flexibility and Metabolic Activation of Chemicals. II. General Ames Mutagenicity Model , 2007 .

[22]  J. Vervoort,et al.  QSAR models for predicting in vivo aquatic toxicity of chlorinated alkanes to fish. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[23]  G. Patlewicz,et al.  An evaluation of the implementation of the Cramer classification scheme in the Toxtree software , 2008, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[24]  Markus A Lill,et al.  Prediction of Small‐Molecule Binding to Cytochrome P450 3A4: Flexible Docking Combined with Multidimensional QSAR , 2006, ChemMedChem.

[25]  A. Vedani,et al.  Mixed-model QSAR at the human mineralocorticoid receptor: predicting binding mode and affinity of anabolic steroids. , 2009, Toxicology letters.

[26]  Nigel Greene,et al.  Early toxicity screening strategies. , 2009, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[27]  S. Enoch,et al.  Quantitative and mechanistic read across for predicting the skin sensitization potential of alkenes acting via Michael addition. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[28]  Cédric Merlot,et al.  In silico methods for early toxicity assessment. , 2008, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[29]  Walter Filgueira de Azevedo,et al.  Computational methods for calculation of ligand-binding affinity. , 2008, Current drug targets.

[30]  H. van de Waterbeemd,et al.  ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise? , 2003, Nature reviews. Drug discovery.

[31]  Nina Jeliazkova,et al.  Toxmatch--a chemical classification and activity prediction tool based on similarity measures. , 2008, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[32]  B. Fischer Receptor‐mediated effects of chlorinated hydrocarbons , 2000, Andrologia.

[33]  Peter Zbinden,et al.  Quasi-Atomistic Receptor Surface Models: A Bridge between 3-D QSAR and Receptor Modeling , 1998 .

[34]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  Computational Tools for Regulatory Needs , 2006 .

[35]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  Statistically Validated QSARs, Based on Theoretical Descriptors, for Modeling Aquatic Toxicity of Organic Chemicals in Pimephales promelas (Fathead Minnow) , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[36]  Chang-Ying Ma,et al.  In silico prediction of mitochondrial toxicity by using GA-CG-SVM approach. , 2009, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[37]  Jozef Hritz,et al.  Impact of plasticity and flexibility on docking results for cytochrome P450 2D6: a combined approach of molecular dynamics and ligand docking. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[38]  David J. Handelsman,et al.  Tetrahydrogestrinone is a potent androgen and progestin. , 2004, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[39]  B. Říhová,et al.  Receptor-mediated targeted drug or toxin delivery. , 1998, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[40]  Max Dobler,et al.  5D-QSAR: the key for simulating induced fit? , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[41]  Christoph Helma,et al.  In silico predictive toxicology: the state-of-the-art and strategies to predict human health effects. , 2005, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[42]  C Helma,et al.  Predictive Models for Carcinogenicity and Mutagenicity: Frameworks, State-of-the-Art, and Perspectives , 2009, Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews.

[43]  Thomas Steger-Hartmann,et al.  Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances. , 2006, Toxicology.

[44]  M. Hahn Receptor surface models. 1. Definition and construction. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[45]  Alex M Aronov,et al.  Predictive in silico modeling for hERG channel blockers. , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[46]  Beat Ernst,et al.  Predicting the toxic potential of drugs and chemicals in silico: a model for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma). , 2007, Toxicology letters.

[47]  Markus A Lill,et al.  Predicting the toxic potential of drugs and chemicals in silico. , 2007, ALTEX.

[48]  Shuichi Hirono,et al.  Structure-Based CoMFA As a Predictive Model - CYP2C9 Inhibitors As a Test Case , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[49]  Max Dobler,et al.  Multi-conformational Ligand Representation in 4D-QSAR: Reducing the Bias Associated with Ligand Alignment , 2000 .

[50]  M. Pavan,et al.  Publicly-accessible QSAR software tools developed by the Joint Research Centre , 2008, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[51]  G D Veith On the nature, evolution and future of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) in toxicology , 2004, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[52]  P. Harper,et al.  The Ah receptor: mediator of the toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related compounds. , 1994, Toxicology letters.

[53]  S. Homans,et al.  Water, water everywhere--except where it matters? , 2007, Drug discovery today.

[54]  P. Hoffmann,et al.  Are hERG channel inhibition and QT interval prolongation all there is in drug-induced torsadogenesis? A review of emerging trends. , 2006, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[55]  A. Soto,et al.  Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans , 1994 .

[56]  Markus A. Lill,et al.  Simulating α/β Selectivity at the Human Thyroid Hormone Receptor: Consensus Scoring Using Multidimensional QSAR , 2007 .

[57]  S. Safe,et al.  Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and related compounds: environmental and mechanistic considerations which support the development of toxic equivalency factors (TEFs). , 1990, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[58]  H. Rosenkranz,et al.  Use of artificial intelligence in structure-affinity correlations of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) receptor ligands. , 1991, Carcinogenesis.

[59]  E. Benfenati,et al.  In silico-aided prediction of biological properties of chemicals: oestrogen receptor-mediated effects. , 2008, Chemical Society reviews.

[60]  S. Muggleton,et al.  A Novel Logic‐Based Approach for Quantitative Toxicology Prediction. , 2007 .

[61]  T. Colborn,et al.  Environmental estrogens: health implications for humans and wildlife. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[62]  E. Freire Do enthalpy and entropy distinguish first in class from best in class? , 2008, Drug discovery today.

[63]  J. Whitlock,et al.  Mechanistic aspects of dioxin action. , 1993, Chemical research in toxicology.

[64]  Chris de Graaf,et al.  Cytochrome P450 in Silico: An Integrative Modeling Approach , 2005 .

[65]  Jian Wang,et al.  In Silico Elucidation of the Molecular Mechanism Defining the Adverse Effect of Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[66]  Thierry Langer,et al.  LigandScout: 3-D Pharmacophores Derived from Protein-Bound Ligands and Their Use as Virtual Screening Filters , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[67]  J. Gustafsson Receptor-mediated toxicity. , 1995, Toxicology letters.

[68]  Andrew P Worth,et al.  Quantitative structure‐activity relationships for human health effects: Commonalities with other endpoints , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[69]  A. Vedani,et al.  Combining protein modeling and 6D-QSAR. Simulating the binding of structurally diverse ligands to the estrogen receptor. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[70]  A. Vedani,et al.  VirtualToxLab - in silico prediction of the toxic (endocrine-disrupting) potential of drugs, chemicals and natural products. Two years and 2,000 compounds of experience: a progress report. , 2009, ALTEX.

[71]  Themis Lazaridis,et al.  Water at biomolecular binding interfaces. , 2007, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.