Recent disasters and organizations such as SPUR have identified and highlighted a need for a shift away from designing code-minimum buildings that are life-safe but often disposable. An important piece of this shift requires an understanding of buildings' life-cycle costs including a consideration of the associated environmental impacts induced by earthquake damage. Appropriate detailing of nonstructural components, the use of high-performance structural systems that outperform typical code-based designs, and consideration of the interactions between structural and nonstructural systems can greatly reduce expected damage and minimize the environmental impacts associated with seismic damage throughout a building's life. To evaluate seismic force-resisting systems and weigh their relative long term environmental impacts, the expected seismic damage throughout a building's lifespan and the environmental impact associated with that damage must be quantified. A method for performing such an evaluation has been developed by the authors and is discussed. Results of case study projects are presented and compared, along with lessons learned from the case studies and applications.
[1]
Chris Tokas,et al.
Risk Based Seismic Evaluation of Pre-1973 Hospital Buildings Using the HAZUS Methodology
,
2009
.
[2]
B. Obama,et al.
Executive Order 13514: Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance
,
2009
.
[3]
Richard Wood,et al.
The sustainability practitioner's guide to input-output analysis
,
2010
.
[4]
Leed Ap,et al.
Consideration of Building Performance in Sustainable Design: A Structural Engineer's Role
,
2008
.
[5]
Robert V. Whitman,et al.
HAZUS Earthquake Loss Estimation Methods
,
2006
.
[6]
Henry Burton.
Assessing the Scale of Environmental Impacts from a Major California Earthquake Recovery
,
2011
.
[7]
Emily Lorenz,et al.
Sustainability guidelines for the structural engineer.
,
2010
.