How Should Fitts' Law be Applied to Human-Computer Interaction?

The paper challenges the notion that any Fitts' Law model can be applied generally to human-computer interaction, and proposes instead that applying Fitts' Law requires knowledge of the users' sequence of movements, direction of movement, and typical movement amplitudes as well as target sizes. Two experiments examined a text selection task with sequences of controlled movements (point-click and point-drag). For the point-click sequence, a Fitts' Law model that used the diagonal across the text object in the direction of pointing (rather than the horizontal extent of the text object) as the target size provided the best fit for the pointing time data, whereas for the point-drag sequence, a Fitts' Law model that used the vertical size of the text object as the target size gave the best fit. Dragging times were fitted well by Fitts' Law models that used either the vertical or horizontal size of the terminal character in the text object. Additional results of note were that pointing in the point-click sequence was consistently faster than in the point-drag sequence, and that pointing in either sequence was consistently faster than dragging. The discussion centres around the need to define task characteristics before applying Fitts' Law to an interface design or analysis, analyses of pointing and of dragging, and implications for interface design.

[1]  P. Fitts,et al.  Information capacity of discrete motor responses under different cognitive sets. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  E. Hoffmann,et al.  Geometrical conditions for ballistic and visually controlled movements. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[3]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[4]  D. Chaffin,et al.  An investigation of fitts' law using a wide range of movement amplitudes. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Simulating a Skilled Typist: A Study of Skilled Cognitive-Motor Performance , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Jeffrey C. Jackson,et al.  Circling: a method of mouse-based selection without button presses , 1989, CHI '89.

[8]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  A comparison of input devices in element pointing and dragging tasks , 1991, CHI.

[9]  A. Chapanis Some Generalizations about Generalization , 1988 .

[10]  B. Kantowitz,et al.  Fitts' law with an isometric controller: effects of order of control and control-display gain. , 1988, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Application of Fitts' Law to Foot-Pedal Design , 1975 .

[12]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys, for text selection on a CRT , 1987 .

[13]  E. R. Crossman,et al.  Feedback Control of Hand-Movement and Fitts' Law , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Brian W. Epps Comparison of Six Cursor Control Devices Based on Fitts' Law Models , 1986 .

[16]  A. T. Welford,et al.  The fundamentals of skill , 1968 .