On Multiple Regulatory Mechanisms in the Tryptophan Operon System in Escherichia coli: In silico Study of Perturbation Dynamics

Living organisms often exist in uncertain environments where changes are the norm. Cellular systems therefore require resilient regulatory mechanisms for timely and stable adaptation. Among various regulation motifs, multiple feedback control emerges as a common theme. The tryptophan operon system in Escherichia coli regulates the production ofintracellular tryptophan using an apparatus of three feedback mechanisms: repression, attenuation and enzyme inhibition; each provides essentially the same function but operates in distinctly different ways. Here we aim to understand the roles of each loop by studying transient dynamics of the system to perturbations of different types; to reveal the underlying relationships between individual control mechanisms and macroscopic behaviour. We develop an S-systems approximation of an existing model for the system and characterise transient dynamics by introducing two measurable quantities: maximum disturbance (MD) and recovery time (RT). Our simulation results showed that combined regulation using all three feedback mechanisms significantly increases system stability, broadening the range of kinetic parameters for stable behaviour. Enzyme inhibition was shown to directly control the disturbance level in system variables after perturbations. Attenuation, on the other hand, was found to speed up system recovery whereas repression lengthens recovery time. The method developed in this paper and the defined transient dynamics measurements can be applied to other cellular systems.

[1]  A. K. Sen,et al.  Dynamic analysis of genetic control and regulation of amino acid synthesis: The tryptophan operon in Escherichia coli , 1990, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  Kim Sneppen,et al.  Structure and function of negative feedback loops at the interface of genetic and metabolic networks , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  M. Freeman Feedback control of intercellular signalling in development , 2000, Nature.

[4]  Moisés Santillán,et al.  Dynamic influence of feedback enzyme inhibition and transcription attenuation on the tryptophan operon response to nutritional shifts. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  Subodh B. Rawool,et al.  Dynamic model of Escherichia coli tryptophan operon shows an optimal structural design. , 2003, European journal of biochemistry.

[6]  J. C. Nuño,et al.  Generalization of the theory of transition times in metabolic pathways: a geometrical approach. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[7]  M C Mackey,et al.  Dynamic regulation of the tryptophan operon: a modeling study and comparison with experimental data. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Computational Analysis of Biochemical Systems: A Practical Guide for Biochemists and Molecular Biologists , 2000 .

[9]  J. S. Easterby,et al.  A generalized theory of the transition time for sequential enzyme reactions. , 1981, The Biochemical journal.

[10]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. III. Dynamic solutions using a power-law approximation , 1970 .

[11]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  An-Ping Zeng,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics of Regulation of Bacterial trpOperon: Model Analysis of Integrated Effects of Repression, Feedback Inhibition, and Attenuation , 2002, Biotechnology progress.

[13]  R Thomas,et al.  Dynamical behaviour of biological regulatory networks--I. Biological role of feedback loops and practical use of the concept of the loop-characteristic state. , 1995, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[14]  D. A. Baxter,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Gene Networks , 2000, Neuron.

[15]  C. Yanofsky,et al.  Role of regulatory features of the trp operon of Escherichia coli in mediating a response to a nutritional shift , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Structural kinetic modeling of metabolic networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  J. S. Easterby,et al.  Coupled enzyme assays: a general expression for the transient. , 1973, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[18]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  S-system modelling of complex systems with chaotic input , 1993 .

[19]  R. D. Bliss,et al.  Role of feedback inhibition in stabilizing the classical operon. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  Garrett B Stanley,et al.  Transient and steady-state dynamics of cortical adaptation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Buffering in Models of Integrated Biochemical Systems , 1998 .

[22]  J. S. Easterby,et al.  The effect of feedback on pathway transient response. , 1986, The Biochemical journal.

[23]  J. Monod,et al.  Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. , 1961, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  M. Cascante,et al.  Molecular Bureaucracy: Who Controls the Delays? , 1996 .

[25]  M. Santillán,et al.  Analytical Study of the Multiplicity of Regulatory Mechanisms in the Tryptophan Operon , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[26]  Nemat O. Keyhani,et al.  Ancient Origin of the Tryptophan Operon and the Dynamics of Evolutionary Change , 2003, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[27]  Eberhard O Voit,et al.  Computation and analysis of time-dependent sensitivities in Generalized Mass Action systems. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  N V Torres,et al.  Analysis and characterization of transition states in metabolic systems. Transition times and the passivity of the output flux. , 1991, The Biochemical journal.

[29]  Michael A. Savageau,et al.  Design principles for elementary gene circuits: Elements, methods, and examples. , 2001, Chaos.

[30]  E. Voit,et al.  Recasting nonlinear differential equations as S-systems: a canonical nonlinear form , 1987 .

[31]  S. Sinha Theoretical study of tryptophan operon: Application in microbial technology , 1988, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[32]  E. Birge Bacterial and Bacteriophage Genetics , 1981, Springer Series in Microbiology.

[33]  Sharad Bhartiya,et al.  Multiple feedback loops are key to a robust dynamic performance of tryptophan regulation in Escherichia coli , 2004, FEBS letters.

[34]  C. Yanofsky Transcription Attenuation: Once Viewed as a Novel Regulatory Strategy , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[35]  C. Yanofsky,et al.  Transcription termination at the trp operon attenuators of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: RNA secondary structure and regulation of termination. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  David Botstein,et al.  Transcriptional response of steady-state yeast cultures to transient perturbations in carbon source. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  C. Yanofsky Using Studies on Tryptophan Metabolism to Answer Basic Biological Questions , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.