Hemostasis laboratory testing methods have changed significantly over the past decades, from totally manual, to fully automated methodologies. Most medical laboratory educators prefer to use manual or semi–automated methods to teach hemostasis so that students can “see” what is occurring during the testing method, but many semi-automated instruments are no longer commercially available or are not cost-effective for education programs. In consideration of these factors and due to programmatic expansion to a coordinate campus, the CLS program explored new ways to teach hemostasis methods equitably and affordably across two distant locations. Working with an instructional design team versed in online education, five virtual hemostasis laboratory exercises were created that mimic the manual methodologies. Web-based didactic instruction was also developed to teach the testing theory and pathophysiology related to patient results. The efficacy of the virtual instruction was evaluated through assessment of student performance on exam questions, professional certification scores for the platelet/hemostasis sub-category, student satisfaction surveys, and evaluation of student performance during their clinical experience. Results showed that students in the virtual delivery format performed significantly better on exam questions compared to the traditional delivery method group, but there was no significant difference in their performance on the professional certification exam. Both student and preceptor feedback have been positive on the value of the exercises for students' understanding of hemostasis. ABBREVIATIONS CLS-Clinical Laboratory Science or Clinical Laboratory Scientist, MLS-Medical Laboratory Science or Medical Laboratory Scientist, BOC-Board of Certification exam, GPA-Grade Point Average, PT-Prothrombin Time, APTT-Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time, TT-Thrombin Time, PC-Personal Computer with Microsoft Operating System, MAC-Macintosh-based computer with Apple Operating System, DSL-Digital Subscriber Line Internet connection
[1]
Anthony D. Feig.
An online introductory physical geology laboratory: From concept to outcome
,
2010
.
[2]
Barbara Means,et al.
Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies
,
2009
.
[3]
V. Bacharach,et al.
Psychometrics : An Introduction
,
2007
.
[4]
Mark Sadoski,et al.
The Texas A&M Experience With Class Size and Campus Expansion: Evaluation of First Year Using Distance Learning and On-Site Curriculum Delivery
,
2010,
Teaching and learning in medicine.
[5]
D. Garrison,et al.
Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough
,
2005
.
[6]
Rosemary M. Lehman,et al.
Creating a Sense of Presence in Online Teaching: How to "Be There" for Distance Learners
,
2010
.
[7]
Muneeza Esani,et al.
Moving from Face-to-Face to Online Teaching
,
2010,
American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science.
[8]
Ronald Reuter.
Online Versus in the Classroom: Student Success in a Hands-On Lab Class
,
2009
.
[9]
Scott D. Johnson,et al.
Comparative Analysis of Online vs. Face-to-Face Instruction
,
1999,
WebNet.