LCSA Framework for Assessing Sustainability of Alternative Fuels for Transport Sector

Consideration of alternative transport fuels, produced from feedstocks and renewable resources, is inevitable to enhance energy security and alleviate environmental burdens. Whilst these fuels are apparently considered to be clean, they may not be entirely sustainable from economic, environmental and social perspectives. A Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) framework that integrates all three components of the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) sustainability can potentially be used to evaluate the sustainability performance of fuels from well to wheel. This paper presents an LCSA framework consisting of Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (ELCA), Life Cycle Cost (LCC) and Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA) tools to assess the environmental, economic and social performance of alternative fuels. The framework is aimed at identifying the areas that require improvements for overall sustainability performance. The proposed framework provides a comprehensive basis that considers the region-specific variations in the life cycle data pertaining to alternative fuels. The added feature of the framework is its robustness to accommodate variations in natural resources, and other regional issues, such as socio-economic and demographic changes. The framework has been tested using a hypothetical example of canola-based biodiesel.

[1]  K. Thanikasalam,et al.  Concerns over use of leaded aviation gasoline (avgas) fuel , 2018 .

[2]  Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation in Pakistan: Policy regime for a sustainable energy mix , 2017 .

[3]  Eva Llera-Sastresa,et al.  A multi-criteria sustainability assessment for biodiesel and liquefied natural gas as alternative fuels in transport systems , 2017 .

[4]  Hwai Chyuan Ong,et al.  Enzymatic Hydrolysis Using Ultrasound for Bioethanol Production from Durian (Durio zibethinus) Seeds as Potential Biofuel , 2017 .

[5]  Omer Tatari,et al.  Uncertainty-embedded dynamic life cycle sustainability assessment framework: An ex-ante perspective on the impacts of alternative vehicle options , 2016 .

[6]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Alternative Passenger Vehicles , 2014 .

[7]  A. Azapagic,et al.  Sustainability assessment of energy systems: Integrating environmental, economic and social aspects , 2014 .

[8]  S. Mathé,et al.  Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  From LCA to Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: concept, practice and future directions , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[10]  W. Biswas,et al.  Biodiesel production in a semiarid environment: a life cycle assessment approach. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Ferry Rustandi,et al.  Biodiesel Production from Canola in Western Australia: Energy and Carbon Footprints and Land, Water, and Labour Requirements , 2010 .

[12]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[13]  J. Guinée Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: What Is It and What Are Its Challenges? , 2016 .

[14]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Timothy F. Slaper,et al.  The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work? , 2011 .