Improving building project performance: how buildability benchmarking can help

Although the buildability of building designs has not been commonly taken as an important parameter in design quality assessment, previous studies have linked buildability to time, cost, quality and safety performance in many ways. Based on this observation, the question arises of how buildability can be benchmarked and which aspects of project performance can be improved. After identifying available benchmarking tools, the relative correlations are investigated between different buildability attributes and construction performance in terms of time, cost, quality and safety. Based on a questionnaire survey, it was found that construction time performance has strong positive correlations with buildability in the design of external wall elements, simplicity of assembly and installation considerations, while other design attributes affect cost, quality and safety performance to varying degrees. With this understanding, it is postulated that best practice can be promoted among design teams for enhancing buildability, which would in turn raise project performance. Three experienced practitioners have been interviewed for verifying the practicality of buildability benchmarking. As an incentive to improve buildability, benchmarking would help construction stakeholders reap their desired benefits by focusing on the related design attributes in the pre‐construction stage, particularly for functionally oriented buildings.

[1]  Stephen Fox,et al.  Constructability rules: guidelines for successful application to bespoke buildings , 2002 .

[2]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Determinants of rework in building construction projects , 2004 .

[3]  C. Laymon A. study , 2018, Predication and Ontology.

[4]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  The development of cognitive models for constructability assessment in steel frame structures , 2004 .

[5]  David Arditi,et al.  Trends in productivity improvement in the US construction industry , 2000 .

[6]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Can Design Improve Construction Safety?: Assessing the Impact of a Collaborative Safety-in-Design Process , 2005 .

[7]  David M. Gann,et al.  Design Quality Indicator as a tool for thinking , 2003 .

[8]  Anthony Walker,et al.  Project Management in Construction , 1984 .

[9]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski,et al.  Quantitative constructability analysis with a neuro-fuzzy knowledge-based multi-criterion decision support system , 1999 .

[10]  Mohamed Mohamed Naim,et al.  Choice and delivery in housebuilding: lessons from Japan for UK housebuilders , 2003 .

[11]  Ayman H. Al-Momani,et al.  Construction delay: a quantitative analysis , 2000 .

[12]  Apc Chan,et al.  From attitude to culture : effect of safety climate on construction safety , 2005 .

[13]  James T. O'Connor,et al.  Industrial Project Constructability Improvement , 1986 .

[14]  Paul S.H. Poh,et al.  The Singapore buildable design appraisal system: a preliminary review of the relationship between buildability, site productivity and cost. , 1998 .

[15]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Assessing quality relationships in public housing: An empirical study , 2006 .

[16]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  A computational intelligent fuzzy model approach for excavator cycle time simulation , 2003 .

[17]  Sui Pheng Low,et al.  Quantifying the relationships between buildability, structural quality and productivity in construction , 2001 .

[18]  Michael Behm Establishing the link between construction fatalities and disabling injuries and the design for construction safety concept , 2004 .

[19]  Mohamed Mohamed Naim,et al.  Re‐engineering a construction supply chain: a material flow control approach , 2003 .

[20]  James T. O'Connor,et al.  Constructability for Piping Automation: Field Operations , 1991 .

[21]  Low Sui Pheng,et al.  Integrating buildability in ISO 9000 quality management systems: case study of a condominium project , 2001 .

[22]  George Jergeas,et al.  Benefits of Constructability on Construction Projects , 2001 .

[23]  M. Naim,et al.  Identifying supply chain solutions in the UK house building sector , 2001 .

[24]  Takayuki Minato,et al.  Representing causal mechanism of defective designs: exploration through case studies , 2004 .

[25]  Low Sui Pheng,et al.  Enhancing buildability in China's construction industry using Singapore's buildable design appraisal system , 2007 .

[26]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  A study of the factors affecting construction durations in Hong Kong , 1995 .

[27]  Valerie Francis,et al.  Constructability Strategy for Improved Project Performance , 1999 .

[28]  James T. O'Connor,et al.  Constructability Concepts for Engineering and Procurement , 1987 .

[29]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Benchmarking of Buildability and Construction Performance in Singapore: Is there a Case for Hong Kong? , 2008 .

[30]  Sui Pheng Low,et al.  A fuzzy quality function deployment system for buildable design decision-makings , 2003 .

[31]  Apc Chan,et al.  A model for buildability assessment in Hong Kong , 2006 .

[32]  Ali Jaafari,et al.  Construction Business Competitiveness and Global Benchmarking , 2000 .

[33]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Contributors to construction delays , 1998 .

[34]  Zainuddin Hassan Conplan: construction planning and buildability evaluation in an integrated and intelligent construction environment , 1997 .