Motor planning: effect of directional uncertainty with discrete spatial cues

We investigated the effect of spatial uncertainty on motor planning by using the cueing method in a reaching task (experiment 1). Discrete spatial cues indicated the different locations in which the target could be presented. The number of cues as well as their direction changed from trial to trial. We tested the adequacy of two models of motor planning to account for the data. The switching model assumes that only one motor response can be planned at a time, whereas the capacity-sharing model assumes that multiple motor responses can be planned in parallel. Both models predict the same relation between average reaction time (RT) and number of cues, but they differ in their prediction of the shape of the distribution of the reaction time. The results showed that RT increased with the number of cues independently from their spatial dispersion. This relation was well described by the function predicted by both models, whereas it was poorly described by the Hick-Hyman law. In addition, the distribution of RT conformed to the prediction of the capacity-sharing model and not to that of the switching model. We investigated the role that the requirement of a spatially directed motor response might have had on this pattern of results by testing subjects in a simple RT task (experiment 2) with the same cueing presentation as in experiment 1. The results contrasted with those in experiment 1 and showed that RT was dependent on the spatial dispersion of the cues and not on their number. The results of the two experiments suggest that the mode of processing of potential targets is dependent on the spatial constraints of the task. The processing resources can be either divided relative to the spatial distribution of possible targets or across multiple independent discrete representations of these targets.

[1]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[2]  R. Hyman Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  C. Dunnett A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control , 1955 .

[4]  J. A. Leonard Tactual Choice Reactions: I , 1959 .

[5]  E. A. Alluisi,et al.  Some variables influencing the rate of gain of information. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  P M FITTS,et al.  Cognitive aspects of information processing: II. Adjustments to stimulus redundancy. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  D. Broadbent,et al.  ON THE INTERACTION OF S-R COMPATIBILITY WITH OTHER VARIABLES AFFECTING REACTION TIME. , 1965, British journal of psychology.

[9]  D L Schurman,et al.  Choice reaction time as a function of stimulus uncertainty, response uncertainty, and behavioral hypotheses. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  W H Teichner,et al.  Laws of visual choice reaction time. , 1974, Psychological review.

[11]  J. Tanji,et al.  Reflex and intended responses in motor cortex pyramidal tract neurons of monkey. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Marilyn L. Shaw,et al.  A capacity allocation model for reaction time. , 1978 .

[13]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  D. Rosenbaum Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  R. Shepard,et al.  Distribution of visual attention over space. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  L. E. Longstreth,et al.  Exceptions to Hick's law: explorations with a response duration measure. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[19]  D. Meyer,et al.  Analyses of multinomial mixture distributions: new tests for stochastic models of cognition and action. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Methods for Dealing With Reaction Time Outliers , 1992 .

[21]  A P Georgopoulos,et al.  Motor cortical activity in a context-recall task. , 1995, Science.

[22]  J Jonides,et al.  Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: new perceptual objects or visual masking? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  M Favilla,et al.  Reaching movements: programming time course is independent of choice number. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[24]  C. Ghez,et al.  Discrete and continuous planning of hand movements and isometric force trajectories , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  S P Tipper,et al.  Action-based mechanisms of attention. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  A Bastian,et al.  Prior information preshapes the population representation of movement direction in motor cortex , 1998, Neuroreport.

[27]  M. A. Basso,et al.  Modulation of Neuronal Activity in Superior Colliculus by Changes in Target Probability , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Early motor influences on visuomotor transformations for reaching: a positive image of optic ataxia , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  D Lee,et al.  Effects of exogenous and endogenous attention on visually guided hand movements. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  E. Fetz,et al.  Primate spinal interneurons show pre-movement instructed delay activity , 1999, Nature.

[31]  J Ashe,et al.  Choice and stimulus-response compatibility affect duration of response selection. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  D P Carey,et al.  Eye–hand coordination: Eye to hand or hand to eye? , 2000, Current Biology.

[33]  Otmar Bock,et al.  The mechanisms of movement preparation: a precuing study , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[34]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  The effects of abrupt onset of 2-D and 3-D distractors on prehension movements , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Simultaneous encoding of multiple potential reach directions in dorsal premotor cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Marco Favilla,et al.  Reaching movements: mode of motor programming influences programming time by itself , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  J. W. Aldridge,et al.  Primate basal ganglia activity in a precued reaching task: preparation for movement , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  G. E. Alexander Selective neuronal discharge in monkey putamen reflects intended direction of planned limb movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Common processing constraints for visuomotor and visual mental rotations , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  O. Bock,et al.  Motor control prior to movement onset: preparatory mechanisms for pointing at visual targets , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.