The Paradoxical Nature of Electronic Decision Aids on Comparison-Shopping: The Experiments and Analysis

Consumers who use electronic decision aids such as comparison-shopping agents may be overwhelmed by the amount of choice information available to them, leading to an inability to choose or dissatisfaction with the ultimate choice, a state of "choice overload." Two experiments were designed to test the choice overload hypothesis. Eight choice tasks of different sizes were presented to subjects. By observing the decision quality, decision time, and decision confidence, we confirmed our hypothesis that choice overload exists when the comparison matrix exceeds a certain size (24 choices and 10 attributes for each choice in this research). Subjects were then given different combinations of decision-making tools (sorting and short-listing) and conditions (refreshing of information) to deal with the same choice task within the choice overload range obtained from the initial experiment. The use of both decision-making tools unexpectedly required more decision-making effort and resulted in less decision satisfaction than when only one decision-making tool was provided. We believe these findings are relevant to the future development of electronic decision aids. Further research is needed in this direction to extend our understanding of decision-making in electronic decision aids mediated environment.

[1]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[2]  Rex Eugene Pereira,et al.  Influence of Query-Based Decision Aids on Consumer Decision Making in Electronic Commerce , 2001, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[3]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Agents to the Rescue? , 1999 .

[4]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Substitutability and similarity in binary choices , 1969 .

[6]  H. Simon.  Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason , 1997 .

[7]  J. E. Russo,et al.  The Value of Unit Price Information , 1977 .

[8]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  A scalable comparison-shopping agent for the World-Wide Web , 1997, AGENTS '97.

[9]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces , 1997 .

[10]  Gerald Häubl,et al.  Preference Construction and Persistence in Digital Marketplaces: The Role of Electronic Recommendation Agents , 2001 .

[11]  Valerie J. Trifts,et al.  Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids , 2000 .

[12]  Hee-Woong Kim,et al.  Order Effect and Vendor Inspection in Online Comparison Shopping , 2008 .

[13]  David H. Krantz,et al.  Rational distance functions for multidimensional scaling , 1967 .

[14]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers , 2000 .

[15]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Consumer Decision-Making at an Internet Shopbot , 2001 .

[16]  W. Wayne Talarzyk,et al.  Electronic Information Systems for Consumers: An Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Formats in Multiple Decision Environments , 1993 .

[17]  Richard Staelin,et al.  Consumer Search and Public Policy , 1981 .

[18]  David Clark,et al.  Shopbots Become Agents for Business Change , 2000, Computer.

[19]  Robert E. Widing,et al.  Are interactive decision aids better than passive decision aids? A comparison with implications for information providers on the internet , 2002 .

[20]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[22]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences , 2000 .

[23]  J. Payne,et al.  The Relationship Between Prior Brand Knowledge and Information Acquisition Order , 1988 .

[24]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  On the Depth and Dynamics of Online Search Behavior , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that reduce work and information overload , 1994, CACM.

[26]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Use of Information in Decision Making: An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Computer-Based Decision Aids , 1992, MIS Q..

[27]  Ramayya Krishnan,et al.  Designing a Better Shopbot , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[28]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[30]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Maximizing Versus Satisficing : Happiness Is a Matter of Choice , 2002 .

[31]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An experimental investigation of the impact of computer-based decision aids on the process of preferential choice , 1988 .