Recognizing and Utilizing Expertise in Work Groups: A Status Characteristics Perspective

This paper develops and tests a theory of expertise recognition and utilization in groups that focuses on the critical role of members' status cues as indicators of task expertise. The theory draws on status characteristics theory and past research on groups to propose that while attributions of expertise in work groups will be informed by both specific (i.e., task-relevant) and diffuse (i.e., social category) status cues, the strength of this association will be contingent on the type of cue as well as on characteristics of the group context. So, whereas specific status cues will better predict attributions of expertise in decentralized, longer-tenured groups, diffuse status cues will better predict attributions of expertise in centralized, shorter-tenured groups. Further, attributions of expertise should fully mediate the relationship between members' status cues and intragroup influence. A multilevel test of these hypotheses in a sample of self-managed production teams in a Fortune 100 high-technology firm provides strong support. Group-level analyses confirm that the alignment of intragroup influence with specific status cues is positively associated with group performance.

[1]  L. Argote.  Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[2]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling Unshared Information: The Benefits of Knowing How Access to Information Is Distributed among Group Members , 2000 .

[3]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Motivational Influences on Impression Formation: Outcome Dependency, Accuracy-Driven Attention, and Individuating Processes , 1987 .

[4]  J. March.  Influence Measurement in Experimental and Semi-Experimental Groups , 1956 .

[5]  Glenn E. Littlepage,et al.  Recognition and utilization of expertise in problem-solving groups: Expert characteristics and behavior. , 1997 .

[6]  L. H.,et al.  Communication Networks , 1936, Nature.

[7]  Edgar F. Borgatta,et al.  The Exercise of Influence in Small Groups. , 1965 .

[8]  J. Bunderson.  Team Member Functional Background and Involvement in Management Teams: Direct Effects and the Moderating Role of Power Centralization , 2003 .

[9]  Diane Liang Rulke,et al.  Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group Performance , 2000 .

[10]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[11]  Glenn E. Littlepage,et al.  An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. , 1995 .

[12]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  E. Brunswik.  Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments , 1957 .

[14]  Daniel J. Brass.  Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[15]  R. Moreland,et al.  Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication? , 2000 .

[16]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Laboratory Research: A Question of When, Not If. , 1985 .

[17]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[18]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[19]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[20]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[21]  The exercise of influence in small groups , 1966 .

[22]  Mary Anne Devanna.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[23]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing From Laboratory to Field Settings. , 1987 .

[24]  E. Salas,et al.  Task Cues, Dominance Cues, and Influence in Task Groups , 1993 .

[25]  C. Keating,et al.  The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Aaron M. Brower,et al.  What's Social about Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups , 1996 .

[27]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[28]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[29]  W. Mcguire,et al.  Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  M. Spence.  Job Market Signaling , 1973 .

[31]  G. Littlepage,et al.  Effects of Task Experience and Group Experience on Group Performance, Member Ability, and Recognition of Expertise , 1997 .

[32]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 2007 .

[33]  L. Hembroff,et al.  Status characteristics: degrees of task relevance and decision processes , 1984 .

[34]  Luis L. Martins,et al.  Racioethnic Diversity and Group Members’ Experiences , 2003 .

[35]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group learning in organizations. , 2001 .

[36]  D. Hambrick.  Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams. , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[37]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Nonverbal Behavior, Dominance, and the Basis of Status in Task Groups , 1987 .

[39]  Joseph Berger,et al.  STATUS ORGANIZING PROCESSES , 1980 .

[40]  A. Brooks.  Power and the Production of Knowledge: Collective Team Learning in Work Organizations. , 1994 .

[41]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .

[42]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Groups as problem‐solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition , 1993 .

[43]  H. Ibarra.  NETWORK CENTRALITY, POWER, AND INNOVATION INVOLVEMENT: DETERMINANTS OF TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ROLES , 1993 .

[44]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  Theoretical Consequences of the Status Characteristics Formulation , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  D. Wegner,et al.  Transactive memory in close relationships. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  G. Littlepage,et al.  Recognition of Expertise in Decision-Making Groups , 1992 .

[47]  S Finkelstein,et al.  Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[48]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  At the Margins: A Distinctiveness Approach to the Social Identity and Social Networks of Underrepresented Groups , 1998 .

[49]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[50]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[51]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[52]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Outcome dependency: Attention, attribution, and attraction. , 1976 .

[53]  P. Yetton,et al.  Individual and Group Judgments of Internal Control Systems , 1983 .

[54]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[55]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[56]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Motivational influences on impression formation: outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  E. Cohen,et al.  EXPECTATION STATES AND INTERRACIAL INTERACTION IN SCHOOL SETTINGS , 1982 .

[58]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. , 1995 .

[59]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. , 1989 .

[60]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[61]  R. Katz.  The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. , 1982 .

[62]  John R. Austin.  Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  M. Brewer,et al.  The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories , 1989 .

[64]  David G. Wagner,et al.  Can gender inequalities be reduced , 1986 .

[65]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[66]  B. Cohen,et al.  Status processes in enduring work groups. , 1991 .

[67]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  B. Mullen,et al.  Status, Expectations, and Behavior , 1990 .

[69]  J. Berger.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach , 1976 .

[70]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[71]  R. Moreland.  Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. , 1999 .

[72]  P. Allison.  Measures of Inequality , 1978 .

[73]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The statistical analysis of data from small groups. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[74]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  The Bias Toward Discussing Shared Information , 2000, Commun. Res..

[75]  Rebecca A. Henry,et al.  Helping Groups Determine Their Most Accurate Member: The Role of Outcome Feedback1 , 1996 .

[76]  Frederick C. Miner,et al.  Group versus individual decision making: An investigation of performance measures, decision strategies, and process losses/gains , 1984 .

[77]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[78]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[79]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction , 1972 .

[80]  J. W. Balkwell.  From Expectations to Behavior: An Improved Postulate for Expectation States Theory , 1991 .

[81]  Alberto Leon-Garcia,et al.  Communication Networks , 2000 .

[82]  Garold Stasser,et al.  The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. , 1999 .

[83]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[84]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[85]  Raymond A. Noe,et al.  JUSTICE IN TEAMS: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE , 2002 .

[86]  J. Levine,et al.  Shared Cognition in-Organizations: The Management of Knowledge , 1999 .

[87]  Reid Hastie,et al.  The impact of information on small group choice. , 1997 .

[88]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes , 2001 .

[89]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Bringing the Individual Back in: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organizations , 1994 .

[90]  Ken T. Trotman,et al.  Member Variation, Recognition of Expertise, and Group Performance , 1987 .

[91]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[92]  Patricia Pitcher,et al.  Top Management Team Heterogeneity: Personality, Power, and Proxies , 2001 .

[93]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[94]  Linda Argote,et al.  Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. , 1996 .

[95]  E. Lawler,et al.  Group processes : sociological analyses , 1995 .

[96]  Preston C. Bottger.  Expertise and air time as bases of actual and perceived influence in problem-solving groups. , 1984 .

[97]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[98]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Effects of household sex composition on the salience of one's gender in the spontaneous self-concept. , 1979 .

[99]  Masanori Takezawa,et al.  Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence : An illustration in a group decision-making context , 1997 .