Inter‐project improvement in product development

– Product development projects can be utilized to create not only new products or services but also competitively important capabilities on how to work with product development. The resulting capabilities can be, and often are, as important as the product itself. Although there is potential for an organization to improve product development performance, most organizations can learn even more from their development experiences. A reliance on post‐project reviews to share knowledge across projects is doomed to fail, since it usually is of low priority and does not capture the complexity of development projects. The aim of this research is to investigate what organizations can do to reduce the effect of losing valuable experience gained in product development projects., – A multiple case study approach, using both qualitative and quantitative data, is used to perform a study of two high‐tech product development organizations with respect to their inter‐project improvement activities. A framework concerning inter‐project improvement is presented, containing concepts such as levels of learning, improvement content, and axes of improvement., – To avoid losing valuable experience, an organization should use multiple strategies to share knowledge across projects. Examples of successful strategies are to use a well‐established product development process, professional full‐time project managers as well as modularization of the product., – Although research on organizational learning in product development has increased significantly during the last few years, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of inter‐project improvement by combining perspectives from quality management, organizational learning, and knowledge management.

[1]  Pierre Dussauge,et al.  Strategic Technology Management , 1992 .

[2]  Mariano Corso,et al.  Continuous improvement and inter-project learning in new product development , 1997 .

[3]  Dennis Lock,et al.  The Essentials of Project Management , 1996 .

[4]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[5]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[6]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[7]  Kate D. Abel,et al.  Practices that Support Team Learning and Their Impact on Speed to Market and New Product Success , 1999 .

[8]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[9]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[10]  J. Rasmussen,et al.  Mental procedures in real-life tasks: a case study of electronic trouble shooting. , 1974, Ergonomics.

[11]  Edward Toomer,et al.  Qualitative Methods in Management Research , 1989 .

[12]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[13]  Paul Lillrank,et al.  Continuous improvement: Exploring alternative organizational designs , 2001 .

[14]  C. Argyris.  Double Loop Learning in Organizations , 1996 .

[15]  T. Kotnour.  Organizational learning practices in the project management environment , 2000 .

[16]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .

[17]  A. Griffin.  PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[18]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[19]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[20]  H. Simon.  Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[21]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[22]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[23]  Steve McConnell,et al.  Software Project Survival Guide , 1997 .

[24]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[25]  Dennis Lock.  Project management: Engineering, technology and implementation , 1996 .

[26]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Emerging Convergences or Debates , 1998 .

[27]  S. Merriam.  Case Study Research in Education , 1988 .

[28]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[29]  Per-Erik Ellström,et al.  The Many Meanings of Occupational Competence and Qualification , 1997 .

[30]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[31]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  The Factory as a Learning Laboratory , 2000 .

[32]  Linda L. Brennan,et al.  An integrated view of project and quality management for project‐based organizations , 2000 .

[33]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[34]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .