A closed translocation channel in the substrate-free AAA+ ClpXP protease diminishes rogue degradation

Intracellular proteases must be specific to avoid degrading the wrong proteins. Here, we present cryo-EM structures of E. coli ClpXP, a AAA+ protease, which reveal that the axial channel of ClpX is closed prior to the binding and subsequent translocation of a protein substrate. An open-channel ClpX mutation stimulates degradation of casein, a non-specific substrate, indicating that channel closure contributes to increased degradation specificity. We demonstrate that ClpX activates ClpP cleavage of a degron-free decapeptide by a channel-independent mechanism, in which the peptide substrate appears to pass through a symmetry mismatched gap in the interface between ClpX and ClpP before entering the degradation chamber via the axial portal of ClpP. The peptide products of ClpXP protein degradation are likely to exit the chamber by the reverse route.

[1]  D. Finley,et al.  USP14-regulated allostery of the human proteasome by time-resolved cryo-EM , 2022, Nature.

[2]  T. Baker,et al.  Structure and function of ClpXP, a AAA+ proteolytic machine powered by probabilistic ATP hydrolysis , 2021, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[3]  T. Baker,et al.  Heat activates the AAA+ HslUV protease by melting an axial autoinhibitory plug , 2021, Cell reports.

[4]  Ellen D. Zhong,et al.  CryoDRGN: Reconstruction of heterogeneous cryo-EM structures using neural networks , 2021, Nature Methods.

[5]  T. Baker,et al.  ClpP1P2 peptidase activity promotes biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2020, Molecular microbiology.

[6]  R. Vachet,et al.  The Cleavage Profile of Protein Substrates by ClpXP Reveals Deliberate Starts and Pauses. , 2020, Biochemistry.

[7]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers , 2020, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  T. Baker,et al.  Structural basis of ClpXP recognition and unfolding of ssrA-tagged substrates , 2020, bioRxiv.

[9]  G. Lander,et al.  Structural basis for distinct operational modes and protease activation in AAA+ protease Lon. , 2020, Science advances.

[10]  G. Lander,et al.  Structural basis for distinct operational modes and protease activation in AAA+ protease Lon , 2020, Science Advances.

[11]  G. Lander,et al.  The molecular principles governing the activity and functional diversity of AAA+ proteins , 2019, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[12]  Paul Emsley,et al.  Current developments in Coot for macromolecular model building of Electron Cryo‐microscopy and Crystallographic Data , 2019, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[13]  A. Wlodawer,et al.  Cryo-EM structure of substrate-free E. coli Lon protease provides insights into the dynamics of Lon machinery , 2019, Current research in structural biology.

[14]  Christopher J. Williams,et al.  Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix , 2019, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology.

[15]  Zev A. Ripstein,et al.  A processive rotary mechanism couples substrate unfolding and proteolysis in the ClpXP degradation machinery , 2019, bioRxiv.

[16]  T. Baker,et al.  Structures of the ATP-fueled ClpXP proteolytic machine bound to protein substrate , 2019, bioRxiv.

[17]  T. Baker,et al.  Interactions between a subset of substrate side chains and AAA+ motor pore loops determine grip during protein unfolding , 2019, eLife.

[18]  S. Sieber,et al.  Cryo-EM structure of the ClpXP protein degradation machinery , 2019, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

[19]  Peter Chien,et al.  Regulated Proteolysis in Bacteria. , 2018, Annual review of biochemistry.

[20]  José María Carazo,et al.  MonoRes: Automatic and Accurate Estimation of Local Resolution for Electron Microscopy Maps. , 2018, Structure.

[21]  David J. Fleet,et al.  cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination , 2017, Nature Methods.

[22]  T. Baker,et al.  Highly Dynamic Interactions Maintain Kinetic Stability of the ClpXP Protease During the ATP-Fueled Mechanical Cycle. , 2016, ACS chemical biology.

[23]  Kenneth C. Keiler,et al.  Mechanisms of ribosome rescue in bacteria , 2015, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[24]  M. Howarth,et al.  Site-specific biotinylation of purified proteins using BirA. , 2015, Methods in molecular biology.

[25]  T. Baker,et al.  ClpXP, an ATP-powered unfolding and protein-degradation machine. , 2011, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[26]  Robert T Sauer,et al.  AAA+ proteases: ATP-fueled machines of protein destruction. , 2011, Annual review of biochemistry.

[27]  T. Baker,et al.  Control of substrate gating and translocation into ClpP by channel residues and ClpX binding. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  T. Baker,et al.  Polypeptide translocation by the AAA+ ClpXP protease machine. , 2009, Chemistry & biology.

[29]  Andreas Martin,et al.  Distinct static and dynamic interactions control ATPase-peptidase communication in a AAA+ protease. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[30]  R. Sauer,et al.  The tmRNA system for translational surveillance and ribosome rescue. , 2007, Annual review of biochemistry.

[31]  S. Gygi,et al.  Proteomic profiling of ClpXP substrates after DNA damage reveals extensive instability within SOS regulon. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[32]  M. Bewley,et al.  The asymmetry in the mature amino-terminus of ClpP facilitates a local symmetry match in ClpAP and ClpXP complexes. , 2006, Journal of structural biology.

[33]  Walid A Houry,et al.  Quantitative NMR spectroscopy of supramolecular complexes: dynamic side pores in ClpP are important for product release. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Tania A. Baker,et al.  Rebuilt AAA + motors reveal operating principles for ATP-fuelled machines , 2005, Nature.

[35]  Tania A. Baker,et al.  Asymmetric Interactions of ATP with the AAA+ ClpX6 Unfoldase: Allosteric Control of a Protein Machine , 2005, Cell.

[36]  T. Baker,et al.  Distinct peptide signals in the UmuD and UmuD′ subunits of UmuD/D′ mediate tethering and substrate processing by the ClpXP protease , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Tania A. Baker,et al.  Linkage between ATP Consumption and Mechanical Unfolding during the Protein Processing Reactions of an AAA+ Degradation Machine , 2003, Cell.

[38]  T. Baker,et al.  Proteomic discovery of cellular substrates of the ClpXP protease reveals five classes of ClpX-recognition signals. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[39]  T. Baker,et al.  Overlapping recognition determinants within the ssrA degradation tag allow modulation of proteolysis , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  A. Steven,et al.  Visualization of substrate binding and translocation by the ATP-dependent protease, ClpXP. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[41]  J. Hoskins,et al.  Unfolding and internalization of proteins by the ATP-dependent proteases ClpXP and ClpAP. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  T. Baker,et al.  Dynamics of substrate denaturation and translocation by the ClpXP degradation machine. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[43]  Jimin Wang,et al.  The Structure of ClpP at 2.3 Å Resolution Suggests a Model for ATP-Dependent Proteolysis , 1997, Cell.

[44]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Isolation and characterization of ClpX, a new ATP-dependent specificity component of the Clp protease of Escherichia coli. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[45]  S. Gottesman,et al.  The two-component, ATP-dependent Clp protease of Escherichia coli. Purification, cloning, and mutational analysis of the ATP-binding component. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[46]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Intermediate steps in the degradation of a specific abnormal protein in Escherichia coli. , 1977, The Journal of biological chemistry.