Pluripotency, Differentiation, and Reprogramming: A Gene Expression Dynamics Model with Epigenetic Feedback Regulation

Embryonic stem cells exhibit pluripotency: they can differentiate into all types of somatic cells. Pluripotent genes such as Oct4 and Nanog are activated in the pluripotent state, and their expression decreases during cell differentiation. Inversely, expression of differentiation genes such as Gata6 and Gata4 is promoted during differentiation. The gene regulatory network controlling the expression of these genes has been described, and slower-scale epigenetic modifications have been uncovered. Although the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells is normally irreversible, reprogramming of cells can be experimentally manipulated to regain pluripotency via overexpression of certain genes. Despite these experimental advances, the dynamics and mechanisms of differentiation and reprogramming are not yet fully understood. Based on recent experimental findings, we constructed a simple gene regulatory network including pluripotent and differentiation genes, and we demonstrated the existence of pluripotent and differentiated states from the resultant dynamical-systems model. Two differentiation mechanisms, interaction-induced switching from an expression oscillatory state and noise-assisted transition between bistable stationary states, were tested in the model. The former was found to be relevant to the differentiation process. We also introduced variables representing epigenetic modifications, which controlled the threshold for gene expression. By assuming positive feedback between expression levels and the epigenetic variables, we observed differentiation in expression dynamics. Additionally, with numerical reprogramming experiments for differentiated cells, we showed that pluripotency was recovered in cells by imposing overexpression of two pluripotent genes and external factors to control expression of differentiation genes. Interestingly, these factors were consistent with the four Yamanaka factors, Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and Myc, which were necessary for the establishment of induced pluripotent stem cells. These results, based on a gene regulatory network and expression dynamics, contribute to our wider understanding of pluripotency, differentiation, and reprogramming of cells, and they provide a fresh viewpoint on robustness and control during development.

[1]  M. Kaufman,et al.  Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos , 1981, Nature.

[2]  Megan F. Cole,et al.  Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitry in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2005, Cell.

[3]  Masaki Sasai,et al.  Time Scales in Epigenetic Dynamics and Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Embryonic Stem Cells , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  Wange Lu,et al.  Klf4 Interacts Directly with Oct4 and Sox2 to Promote Reprogramming , 2009, Stem cells.

[5]  M. Ramalho-Santos,et al.  Open chromatin in pluripotency and reprogramming , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[6]  C. Furusawa,et al.  Oscillatory Protein Expression Dynamics Endows Stem Cells with Robust Differentiation Potential , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  Mona Nemer,et al.  Cooperative Interaction between GATA-4 and GATA-6 Regulates Myocardial Gene Expression , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[8]  Zohar Mukamel,et al.  Deterministic direct reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency , 2013, Nature.

[9]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Emergence of amplitude and oscillation death in identical coupled oscillators. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Julianne D. Halley,et al.  A General Model for Binary Cell Fate Decision Gene Circuits with Degeneracy: Indeterminacy and Switch Behavior in the Absence of Cooperativity , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  Shinya Yamanaka,et al.  Elite and stochastic models for induced pluripotent stem cell generation , 2009, Nature.

[12]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.

[13]  Alexei Zaikin,et al.  Multistability and clustering in a population of synthetic genetic oscillators via phase-repulsive cell-to-cell communication. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[14]  K. Kaneko,et al.  Cell division, differentiation and dynamic clustering , 1993, adap-org/9311001.

[15]  Jin Wang,et al.  Quantifying the Waddington landscape and biological paths for development and differentiation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  J Kurths,et al.  Cooperative differentiation through clustering in multicellular populations. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  S. Kauffman.  Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  C. Furusawa,et al.  Theory of robustness of irreversible differentiation in a stem cell system: chaos hypothesis. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  H. Schöler,et al.  Formation of Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Mammalian Embryo Depends on the POU Transcription Factor Oct4 , 1998, Cell.

[20]  Timothy J. Durham,et al.  Systematic analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types , 2011, Nature.

[21]  Aviv Bergman,et al.  Epigenetics Decouples Mutational from Environmental Robustness. Did It Also Facilitate Multicellularity? , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  S. Counce.  The Strategy of the Genes , 1958, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[23]  Y. Yoon,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cells: emerging techniques for nuclear reprogramming. , 2011, Antioxidants & redox signaling.

[24]  Ryoichiro Kageyama,et al.  Oscillatory Control of Factors Determining Multipotency and Fate in Mouse Neural Progenitors , 2013, Science.

[25]  Jin Wang,et al.  Quantifying Waddington landscapes and paths of non-adiabatic cell fate decisions for differentiation, reprogramming and transdifferentiation , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[26]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[27]  K. Kaneko,et al.  Minimal model for stem-cell differentiation. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Epigenetic Cell Memory by Nucleosome Modification , 2007, Cell.

[29]  J. Gurdon,et al.  The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from intestinal epithelium cells of feeding tadpoles. , 1962, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[30]  Jieying Zhu,et al.  H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[31]  S. Emmott,et al.  Defining an essential transcription factor program for naïve pluripotency , 2014, Science.

[32]  M. Murakami,et al.  The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.

[33]  K. Kaneko,et al.  Isologous diversification: A theory of cell differentiation , 1996, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[34]  G. Martin,et al.  Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Kim Sneppen,et al.  Ultrasensitive gene regulation by positive feedback loops in nucleosome modification , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[36]  J. Miyazaki,et al.  Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[37]  J. Shu,et al.  Induction of Pluripotency in Mouse Somatic Cells with Lineage Specifiers , 2013, Cell.

[38]  J. Nichols,et al.  Functional Expression Cloning of Nanog, a Pluripotency Sustaining Factor in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2003, Cell.

[39]  Kunihiko Kaneko,et al.  Epigenetic Feedback Regulation Accelerates Adaptation and Evolution , 2013, PloS one.

[40]  Rong Fan,et al.  Nonstochastic Reprogramming from a Privileged Somatic Cell State , 2014, Cell.

[41]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway. , 2006, Developmental cell.

[42]  Eran Meshorer,et al.  Global epigenetic changes during somatic cell reprogramming to iPS cells. , 2011, Journal of molecular cell biology.

[43]  S. Baylin,et al.  Linking cell signaling and the epigenetic machinery , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  T. Enver,et al.  Forcing cells to change lineages , 2009, Nature.

[45]  S. Pikkarainen,et al.  GATA transcription factors in the developing and adult heart. , 2004, Cardiovascular research.

[46]  John D. Storey,et al.  Identifying and mapping cell-type-specific chromatin programming of gene expression , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Stuart A. Newman,et al.  Rethinking gene regulatory networks in light of alternative splicing, intrinsically disordered protein domains, and post-translational modifications , 2015, Front. Cell Dev. Biol..

[48]  Michael B. Elowitz,et al.  Dynamic Heterogeneity and DNA Methylation in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, Molecular cell.

[49]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Generalizing the transition from amplitude to oscillation death in coupled oscillators. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.