Increasing the on-road fuel economy by trailing at a safe distance

Energy is a driving force for automotive applications. Reducing the energy demand of the vehicle is one method of increasing the fuel economy of a vehicle. Heavy-duty commercial vehicles have large frontal areas that provide large amounts of aerodynamic drag at highway speeds. Reducing the aerodynamic drag lowers the engine demand and therefore increases the fuel economy of the vehicle. This study tested the fuel economy and the front air velocity of a 10.7 m box truck trailing another box truck by distances of 3.1 times the truck length, 4.7 times the truck length, and 6.3 times the truck length at a highway speed of 28 m/s. The distance of 6.3 times the vehicle length was considered ‘safe’ for trailing another vehicle, whereas the distances of 3.1 times the truck length and 4.7 times the truck length were not considered safe by the United States Fire Administration. The results showed significant reductions in the air velocity in front of the trailing vehicle of 8.5%, 6.5%, and 3.8% for trailing distances of 3.1 times the vehicle length, 4.7 times the vehicle length, and 6.3 times the vehicle length respectively. The fuel economy of the trailing truck increased significantly by 7.4–8.0%, 8.2–9.0%, and 6.5%–7.7%, for trailing distances of 3.1 times the vehicle length, 4.7 times the vehicle length, and 6.3 times the vehicle length respectively. Based on a road load analysis, these fuel economy improvements indicated a reduction in the drag coefficient of the trailing vehicle of 8–10%. Therefore, a box truck trailing another box truck at a safe distance results in a reduction in the aerodynamics drag and a significant increase in the fuel economy.

[1]  G Rajamani,et al.  CFD analysis of air flow interactions in vehicle platoons , 2006 .

[2]  O. Gehring,et al.  Practical results of a longitudinal control concept for truck platooning with vehicle to vehicle communication , 1997, Proceedings of Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Christian Navid Nayeri,et al.  Drag Reduction using Base Flaps Combined with Vortex Generators and Fluidic Oscillators on a Bluff Body , 2015 .

[4]  Walter T. Gutierrez,et al.  Aerodynamics overview of the ground transportation systems (GTS) project for heavy vehicle drag reduction , 1996 .

[5]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  When is it Fuel Efficient for a Heavy Duty Vehicle to Catch Up With a Platoon , 2013 .

[6]  Paolo Schito,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Investigation on Vehicles in Platoon , 2012 .

[7]  Hans Fritz,et al.  Fuel Consumption Reduction in a Platoon: Experimental Results with two Electronically Coupled Trucks at Close Spacing , 2000 .

[8]  K P Garry A Review of Commercial Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag Reduction Techniques , 1985 .

[9]  Nick Stabile,et al.  Drag Forces Experienced by 2, 3 and 4-Vehicle Platoons at Close Spacings , 1995 .

[10]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  An experimental study on the fuel reduction potential of heavy duty vehicle platooning , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  Simon Watkins,et al.  The effect of vehicle spacing on the aerodynamics of a representative car shape , 2008 .

[13]  F. Bottiger,et al.  Truck platooning in mixed traffic , 1995, Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '95. Symposium.

[14]  Michael Zabat,et al.  Drag Measurements on 2, 3 and 4 Car Platoons , 1994 .

[15]  The Impact of Design, Position and Combination of Aerodynamic Devices on Drag and Fuel Consumption , 2015 .

[16]  Matthew Ellis,et al.  Aerodynamic Drag and Engine Cooling Effects on Class 8 Trucks in Platooning Configurations , 2015 .

[17]  Urbano Nunes,et al.  Platooning With IVC-Enabled Autonomous Vehicles: Strategies to Mitigate Communication Delays, Improve Safety and Traffic Flow , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Matthew Ellis,et al.  Aerodynamic Comparison of Tractor-Trailer Platooning and A-Train Configuration , 2015 .

[19]  Lino Guzzella,et al.  Vehicle Propulsion Systems: Introduction to Modeling and Optimization , 2005 .

[20]  Walter T. Gutierrez,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE GROUND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (GTS) PROJECT FOR HEAVY VEHICLE DRAG REDUCTION , 1996 .

[21]  Technical Report Review of Aerodynamic Drag Reduction Devices for Heavy Trucks and Buses , 2014 .

[22]  Fred Browand,et al.  Quantifying Platoon Fuel Savings: 1999 Field Experiments , 2001 .

[23]  F. Cheli,et al.  Heavy Truck Drag Reduction Obtained from Devices Installed on the Trailer , 2015 .

[24]  Raja Sengupta,et al.  Aerodynamic Optimization of Trailer Add-On Devices Fully- and Partially-Skirted Trailer Configurations , 2015 .

[25]  H. H. Korst,et al.  The Determination of Vehicle Drag Contributions from Coast-Down Tests , 1972 .

[26]  Simon Watkins,et al.  Aerodynamic Performance of Vehicles in Platoons: The Influence of Backlight Angles , 2007 .