Scale dependence in the effects of leaf ecophysiological traits on photosynthesis: Bayesian parameterization of photosynthesis models.

Relationships between leaf traits and carbon assimilation rates are commonly used to predict primary productivity at scales from the leaf to the globe. We addressed how the shape and magnitude of these relationships vary across temporal, spatial and taxonomic scales to improve estimates of carbon dynamics. Photosynthetic CO2 and light response curves, leaf nitrogen (N), chlorophyll (Chl) concentration and specific leaf area (SLA) of 25 grassland species were measured. In addition, C3 and C4 photosynthesis models were parameterized using a novel hierarchical Bayesian approach to quantify the effects of leaf traits on photosynthetic capacity and parameters at different scales. The effects of plant physiological traits on photosynthetic capacity and parameters varied among species, plant functional types and taxonomic scales. Relationships in the grassland biome were significantly different from the global average. Within-species variability in photosynthetic parameters through the growing season could be attributed to the seasonal changes of leaf traits, especially leaf N and Chl, but these responses followed qualitatively different relationships from the across-species relationship. The results suggest that one broad-scale relationship is not sufficient to characterize ecosystem condition and change at multiple scales. Applying trait relationships without articulating the scales may cause substantial carbon flux estimation errors.

[1]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[2]  M. Dietze.  Gaps in knowledge and data driving uncertainty in models of photosynthesis , 2013, Photosynthesis Research.

[3]  Rob Kooper,et al.  On improving the communication between models and data. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[4]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Photosynthetically relevant foliar traits correlating better on a mass vs an area basis: of ecophysiological relevance or just a case of mathematical imperatives and statistical quicksand? , 2013, The New phytologist.

[5]  B. Enquist,et al.  Assessing the causes and scales of the leaf economics spectrum using venation networks in Populus tremuloides , 2013 .

[6]  S. Pacala,et al.  Global Leaf Trait Relationships: Mass, Area, and the Leaf Economics Spectrum , 2013, Science.

[7]  Michael C. Dietze,et al.  Facilitating feedbacks between field measurements and ecosystem models , 2013 .

[8]  M. Dietze,et al.  Impact of nitrogen allocation on growth and photosynthesis of Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus) , 2012 .

[9]  K. Oleson,et al.  Reconciling leaf physiological traits and canopy flux data: Use of the TRY and FLUXNET databases in the Community Land Model version 4 , 2012 .

[10]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Remote estimation of crop gross primary production with Landsat data , 2012 .

[11]  P. C. Struik,et al.  Leaf photosynthesis and respiration of three bioenergy crops in relation to temperature and leaf nitrogen: how conserved are biochemical model parameters among crop species? , 2011, Journal of experimental botany.

[12]  C. Warren.  How does P affect photosynthesis and metabolite profiles of Eucalyptus globulus? , 2011, Tree physiology.

[13]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Improving canopy processes in the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4) using global flux fields empirically inferred from FLUXNET data , 2011 .

[14]  W. Knorr,et al.  Improving the predictability of global CO2 assimilation rates under climate change , 2011 .

[15]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  REMOTE ESTIMATION OF GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION IN MAIZE , 2011 .

[16]  B. Shipley,et al.  The leaf economics spectrum and the prediction of photosynthetic light–response curves , 2010 .

[17]  B. Ripley,et al.  Differences in drought sensitivities and photosynthetic limitations between co-occurring C3 and C4 (NADP-ME) Panicoid grasses. , 2010, Annals of botany.

[18]  K. Ogle,et al.  A hierarchical Bayesian approach for estimation of photosynthetic parameters of C(3) plants. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[19]  Xin Li,et al.  Parameterization of a coupled CO 2 and H 2 O gas exchange model at the leaf scale of Populus euphratica , 2009 .

[20]  W. Diepenbrock,et al.  Integrating effects of leaf nitrogen, age, rank, and growth temperature into the photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model LEAFC3-N parameterised for barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) , 2009 .

[21]  W. Knorr,et al.  Quantifying photosynthetic capacity and its relationship to leaf nitrogen content for global‐scale terrestrial biosphere models , 2009 .

[22]  K. Hikosaka,et al.  The role of Rubisco and cell walls in the interspecific variation in photosynthetic capacity , 2009, Oecologia.

[23]  D. Haydon.  Models for Ecological Data: An Introduction , 2008 .

[24]  K. Treseder,et al.  Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. , 2008, Ecology.

[25]  J. Skillman.  Quantum yield variation across the three pathways of photosynthesis: not yet out of the dark. , 2007, Journal of experimental botany.

[26]  Thomas D. Sharkey,et al.  Photosynthesis in intact leaves of C3 plants: Physics, physiology and rate limitations , 2008, The Botanical Review.

[27]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability , 2007 .

[28]  Peter B Reich,et al.  Predicting leaf physiology from simple plant and climate attributes: a global GLOPNET analysis. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[29]  James S. Clark,et al.  Models for Ecological Data: An Introduction , 2007 .

[30]  Shuxia Zheng,et al.  Spatial patterns of photosynthetic characteristics and leaf physical traits of plants in the Loess Plateau of China , 2007, Plant Ecology.

[31]  P. Wernecke,et al.  LEAFC3-N: a nitrogen-sensitive extension of the CO2 and H2O gas exchange model leafc3 parameterised and tested for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) , 2005 .

[32]  K. Hikosaka.  Interspecific difference in the photosynthesis–nitrogen relationship: patterns, physiological causes, and ecological importance , 2004, Journal of Plant Research.

[33]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[34]  Thomas D. Sharkey,et al.  An improved model of C3 photosynthesis at high CO2: Reversed O2 sensitivity explained by lack of glycerate reentry into the chloroplast , 1991, Photosynthesis Research.

[35]  P. Reich,et al.  Role of phosphorus and nitrogen in photosynthetic and whole plant carbon gain and nutrient use efficiency in eastern white pine , 1988, Oecologia.

[36]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[37]  J. R. Evans.  Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants , 2004, Oecologia.

[38]  Michael D. Abràmoff,et al.  Image processing with ImageJ , 2004 .

[39]  Sandy P. Harrison,et al.  Climate change and Arctic ecosystems: 2. Modeling, paleodata‐model comparisons, and future projections , 2003 .

[40]  J. Kerr,et al.  From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing , 2003 .

[41]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Decline of photosynthetic capacity with leaf age and position in two tropical pioneer tree species. , 2002, American journal of botany.

[42]  Denis Loustau,et al.  Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. II. A review of experimental data , 2002 .

[43]  B. Medlyn,et al.  Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. I. Seasonal changes in mature maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) , 2002 .

[44]  Keith W. Oleson,et al.  Landscapes as patches of plant functional types: An integrating concept for climate and ecosystem models , 2002 .

[45]  Guy R. Larocque,et al.  Coupling a detailed photosynthetic model with foliage distribution and light attenuation functions to compute daily gross photosynthesis in sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) stands , 2002 .

[46]  Michael Raviv,et al.  The effect of water availability and quality on photosynthesis and productivity of soilless-grown cut roses , 2001 .

[47]  Carl J. Bernacchi,et al.  Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco‐limited photosynthesis , 2001 .

[48]  L. Fuchigami,et al.  Rubisco activation state decreases with increasing nitrogen content in apple leaves. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.

[49]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[50]  S. V. Caemmerer,et al.  Biochemical models of leaf photosynthesis. , 2000 .

[51]  M. Bahn,et al.  A nitrogen sensitive model of leaf carbon dioxide and water vapour gas exchange: application to 13 key species from differently managed mountain grassland ecosystems , 1998 .

[52]  John R. Evans,et al.  Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area , 1998, Oecologia.

[53]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Scaling carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange from leaf to canopy in a deciduous forest. I. Leaf model parametrization , 1995 .

[54]  Stan D. Wullschleger,et al.  Biochemical Limitations to Carbon Assimilation in C3 Plants—A Retrospective Analysis of the A/Ci Curves from 109 Species , 1993 .

[55]  Stuart A. Klugman.  The Hierarchical Bayesian Approach , 1992 .

[56]  G. Collatz,et al.  Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants , 1992 .

[57]  R. Sage,et al.  The Nitrogen Use Efficiency of C(3) and C(4) Plants : III. Leaf Nitrogen Effects on the Activity of Carboxylating Enzymes in Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.). , 1987, Plant physiology.

[58]  R. Sage,et al.  The Nitrogen Use Efficiency of C(3) and C(4) Plants: II. Leaf Nitrogen Effects on the Gas Exchange Characteristics of Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.). , 1987, Plant physiology.

[59]  William G. Hopkins.  An Introduction to Plant Physiology , 1932, Nature.