Characterizing Protein Interactions Employing a Genome-Wide siRNA Cellular Phenotyping Screen

Characterizing the activating and inhibiting effect of protein-protein interactions (PPI) is fundamental to gain insight into the complex signaling system of a human cell. A plethora of methods has been suggested to infer PPI from data on a large scale, but none of them is able to characterize the effect of this interaction. Here, we present a novel computational development that employs mitotic phenotypes of a genome-wide RNAi knockdown screen and enables identifying the activating and inhibiting effects of PPIs. Exemplarily, we applied our technique to a knockdown screen of HeLa cells cultivated at standard conditions. Using a machine learning approach, we obtained high accuracy (82% AUC of the receiver operating characteristics) by cross-validation using 6,870 known activating and inhibiting PPIs as gold standard. We predicted de novo unknown activating and inhibiting effects for 1,954 PPIs in HeLa cells covering the ten major signaling pathways of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, and made these predictions publicly available in a database. We finally demonstrate that the predicted effects can be used to cluster knockdown genes of similar biological processes in coherent subgroups. The characterization of the activating or inhibiting effect of individual PPIs opens up new perspectives for the interpretation of large datasets of PPIs and thus considerably increases the value of PPIs as an integrated resource for studying the detailed function of signaling pathways of the cellular system of interest.

[1]  C. Bakal,et al.  Quantitative Morphological Signatures Define Local Signaling Networks Regulating Cell Morphology , 2007, Science.

[2]  E. Birney,et al.  Pfam: the protein families database , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  N. Perrimon,et al.  Genome-Wide RNAi Analysis of Growth and Viability in Drosophila Cells , 2004, Science.

[4]  C. Martínez-A,et al.  Chemokines integrate JAK/STAT and G‐protein pathways during chemotaxis and calcium flux responses , 2003, European journal of immunology.

[5]  Sandhya Rani,et al.  Human Protein Reference Database—2009 update , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  Peter Ernst,et al.  W2H: WWW interface to the GCG sequence analysis package , 1998, Bioinform..

[7]  Roland Eils,et al.  RIP: the regulatory interaction predictor - a machine learning-based approach for predicting target genes of transcription factors , 2011, Bioinform..

[8]  Yanhui Hu,et al.  Integrating protein-protein interaction networks with phenotypes reveals signs of interactions , 2013, Nature Methods.

[9]  R Eils,et al.  Automated classification of mitotic phenotypes of human cells using fluorescent proteins. , 2008, Methods in cell biology.

[10]  H. Lehrach,et al.  A Human Protein-Protein Interaction Network: A Resource for Annotating the Proteome , 2005, Cell.

[11]  R. Durbin,et al.  Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes , 2010, Nature.

[12]  Francisco S. Roque,et al.  Dissecting spatio-temporal protein networks driving human heart development and related disorders , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[13]  Martin H. Schaefer,et al.  HIPPIE: Integrating Protein Interaction Networks with Experiment Based Quality Scores , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[15]  Masato Kubo,et al.  SOCS proteins, cytokine signalling and immune regulation , 2007, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[16]  T. Ideker,et al.  Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[17]  Yingzi Yang Wnts and wing: Wnt signaling in vertebrate limb development and musculoskeletal morphogenesis. , 2003, Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews.

[18]  O Ritter,et al.  X-HUSAR, an X-based graphical interface for the analysis of genomic sequences. , 1995, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[19]  Enquan Xu,et al.  C-terminal peptides of chemokine-like factor 1 signal through chemokine receptor CCR4 to cross-desensitize the CXCR4. , 2011, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[20]  F. Balkwill Cancer and the chemokine network , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[21]  Yoshihiro Yamanishi,et al.  KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[22]  Sailu Yellaboina,et al.  DOMINE: a comprehensive collection of known and predicted domain-domain interactions , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Damian Szklarczyk,et al.  The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Structures of the CXCR4 Chemokine GPCR with Small-Molecule and Cyclic Peptide Antagonists , 2010, Science.

[25]  Kara Dolinski,et al.  The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2011 update , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  A. Vinayagam,et al.  A Directed Protein Interaction Network for Investigating Intracellular Signal Transduction , 2011, Science Signaling.

[27]  Gary D. Bader,et al.  Cytoscape Web: an interactive web-based network browser , 2010, Bioinform..

[28]  Roland Eils,et al.  Enhancers regulate progression of development in mammalian cells , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  C. Choi,et al.  Epigenetic dysregulation of Wnt signaling pathway in multiple myeloma , 2007, Leukemia.

[30]  M. Boutros,et al.  Clustering phenotype populations by genome-wide RNAi and multiparametric imaging , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[31]  Clifford Liongue,et al.  Cytokine receptor signaling through the Jak-Stat-Socs pathway in disease. , 2007, Molecular immunology.

[32]  Gabriele Sales,et al.  graphite - a Bioconductor package to convert pathway topology to gene network , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.