Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147‐storm analysis of the Panola hillslope

[1] Subsurface stormflow is a dominant runoff-producing mechanism in many upland environments. While there have been many trench-based experimental studies, most of these investigations have examined only a handful of storms. We analyzed subsurface stormflow in response to 147 rainstorms at a trenched hillslope in the Panola Mountain Research Watershed between February 1996 and May 1998. We used this unique long-term data set to examine how often the hillslope delivers water, the contribution of pipe flow to total flow, and the persistence of spatial patterns of flow at the trench face. The long-term data set showed a clear threshold response of subsurface stormflow to storm total precipitation. For storms smaller than the precipitation threshold of 55 mm, little subsurface stormflow was observed. For events exceeding the threshold, there was an almost 2 orders of magnitude increase in subsurface flow compared to subsurface flow from storms smaller than the threshold. Pipe flow was an important component of total subsurface flow and showed a similar threshold behavior. We observed a linear relation between total pipe flow and total subsurface stormflow. Contributions of different trench segments to total trench flow changed seasonally and with changes in precipitation and antecedent conditions. Our results suggest that the threshold relation at the hillslope scale may be an emergent behavior of combined processes internal to the hillslope and perhaps point the way toward how to characterize hillslope processes. A companion paper (Tromp-van Meerveld and McDonnell, 2006) explores the physical mechanisms responsible for the threshold behavior.

[1]  Andrew J. Pearce,et al.  Storm Runoff generation in humid headwater catchments 2. A case study of hillslope and low-order stream response , 1986 .

[2]  Keith Beven,et al.  Riparian control of stream-water chemistry: Implications for hydrochemical basin models , 1998 .

[3]  M. Mosley Streamflow generation in a forested watershed, New Zealand , 1979 .

[4]  Keith Beven,et al.  The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow , 2002 .

[5]  D. Weyman,et al.  MEASUREMENTS OF THE DOWNSLOPE FLOW OF WATER IN A SOIL , 1973 .

[6]  Keith Beven,et al.  Runoff Generation and Implications for River Basin Modelling , 2001 .

[7]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis , 2006 .

[8]  R. Moore,et al.  Throughflow variability on a forested hillslope underlain by compacted glacial till , 2000 .

[9]  Jim E Freer,et al.  Hydrological Dynamics of the Panola Mountain Research Watershed, Georgia , 2003 .

[10]  M. Bonell Progress in the understanding of runoff generation dynamics in forests , 1993 .

[11]  J. Buttle,et al.  Runoff Production in a Forested, Shallow Soil, Canadian Shield Basin , 1995 .

[12]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Flow Pathways on Steep Forested Hillslopes: the Tracer, Tensiometer and Trough Approach , 1998 .

[13]  George H. Hargreaves,et al.  Moisture availability and crop production. , 1975 .

[14]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Quantifying contributions to storm runoff through end‐member mixing analysis and hydrologic measurements at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed (Georgia, USA) , 2001 .

[15]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Tracer and hydrometric study of preferential flow in large undisturbed soil cores from the Georgia Piedmont, USA , 1999 .

[16]  Keith Beven,et al.  Isotope studies of pipeflow at Plynlimon, Wales, UK. , 1996 .

[17]  K. Beven,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF HILLSLOPE FLOW PATHS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING USING DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS , 1991 .

[18]  Ross Woods,et al.  The changing spatial variability of subsurface flow across a hillside , 1996 .

[19]  Keith Beven,et al.  Hydrological processes—Letters. Topographic controls on subsurface storm flow at the hillslope scale for two hydrologically distinct small catchmetns , 1997 .

[20]  T. Mizuyama,et al.  Effects of pipe flow and bedrock groundwater on runoff generation in a steep headwater catchment in Ashiu, central Japan , 2002 .

[21]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Base cation concentrations in subsurface flow from a forested hillslope: The role of flushing frequency , 1998 .

[22]  Tracing Hydrologic Pathways Using Chloride at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed, Georgia, USA , 1998 .

[23]  M. Tani Runoff generation processes estimated from hydrological observations on a steep forested hillslope with a thin soil layer , 1997 .

[24]  M. Bonell,et al.  SELECTED CHALLENGES IN RUNOFF GENERATION RESEARCH IN FORESTS FROM THE HILLSLOPE TO HEADWATER DRAINAGE BASIN SCALE 1 , 1998 .

[25]  Keith Beven,et al.  NEW METHOD DEVELOPED FOR STUDYING FLOW ON HILLSLOPES , 1996 .

[26]  R. D. Black,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Runoff Production in Permeable Soils , 1970 .

[27]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Subsurface flow paths in a steep, unchanneled catchment , 1997 .

[28]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. , 1990 .

[29]  T. Gardner,et al.  Macropore flow on a reclaimed surface mine: infiltration and hillslope hydrology , 2001 .

[30]  Takahisa Mizuyama,et al.  Runoff characteristics of pipeflow and effects of pipeflow on rainfall-runoff phenomena in a mountainous watershed , 1999 .

[31]  K. Beven,et al.  TOPOGRAPHIC CONTROLS ON SUBSURFACE STORM FLOWAT THE HILLSLOPE SCALE FOR TWO HYDROLOGICALLY DISTINCT SMALL CATCHMENTS , 1997 .

[32]  M. P. Mosley,et al.  Subsurface flow velocities through selected forest soils, South Island, New Zealand , 1982 .

[33]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Flow and solute transport through the soil matrix and macropores of a hillslope segment , 1994 .

[34]  J. Hewlett,et al.  Moisture and energy conditions within a sloping soil mass during drainage , 1963 .

[35]  R. Z. Whipkey SUBSURFACE STORMFLOW FROM FORESTED SLOPES , 1965 .

[36]  Subsurface runoff characteristics from a forest hillslope soil profile including macropores, Hitachi Ohta, Japan , 2001 .