An evaluation of a glass ionomer luting agent: bacterial leakage.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Midwest Dental,et al. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment , 1988 .
[2] G. T. Charbeneau,et al. An evaluation of a glass ionomer luting agent: pulpal histological response. , 1987, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[3] B. Bishop,et al. An in vitro study of the effect of moisture on glass-ionomer cement. , 1985, Quintessence international.
[4] R. Herold,et al. Marginal leakage of glass-ionomer cement restorations. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[5] M. Myers,et al. Marginal leakage of contemporary cementing agents. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[6] Makinson Of,et al. Glass-ionomer restorative cements: clinical implications of the setting reaction. , 1982 .
[7] C. Pameijer,et al. Pulpal response to a glass-ionomer cement in primates. , 1981, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[8] B. Causton. The physico-mechanical consequences of exposing glass ionomer cements to water during setting. , 1981, Biomaterials.
[9] I. R. Cooper. The response of the human dental pulp to glass ionomer cements. , 1980, International endodontic journal.
[10] W. Loesche,et al. Longitudinal investigation of the role of Streptococcus mutans in human fissure decay , 1979, Infection and immunity.
[11] W. J. Loesche,et al. Survival of human dental plaque flora in various transport media. , 1972, Applied microbiology.
[12] M. Brännström,et al. The hydrodynamics of the dentine; its possible relationship to dentinal pain. , 1972, International dental journal.
[13] L. Lindén,et al. The hydrodynamics of the dental tubule and of pulp fluid. A discussion of its significance in relation to dentinal sensitivity. , 1967, Caries research.