The Agent Reputation and Trust (ART) Testbed [1] serves two roles: (1) as a competition forum for comparing technologies against objective metrics, and (2) as an environment for performing customizable, easily-repeatable experiments. In the testbed's art appraisal domain, agents valuate paintings for clients and gather opinions from other agents to produce accurate appraisals. In recent years, researchers [2--4] have recognized objective standards are necessary to justify successful trust modeling systems and provide a baseline for future work. For trust technologies to crossover into application [5,6], the public must obtain system evaluations based on transparent, recognizable standards. As a versatile, universal experimentation site, the ART Testbed scopes relevant trust research problems and unites researchers toward solutions via unified experimentation methods. Through objective, well-defined metrics, the testbed provides researchers with tools for comparing and validating their approaches. The testbed also serves as an objective means of presenting technology features---both advantages and disadvantages---to the community. In addition, the ART Testbed places trust research in the public spotlight, improving confidence in the technology and highlighting relevant applications.
[1]
Marco Voss,et al.
Comparing and Evaluating Metrics for Reputation Systems by Simulation
,
2004
.
[2]
Laurent Vercouter,et al.
A specification of the Agent Reputation and Trust (ART) testbed: experimentation and competition for trust in agent societies
,
2005,
AAMAS '05.
[3]
G. Zacharia.
Collaborative reputation mechanisms for online communities
,
1999
.
[4]
Laurent Vercouter,et al.
The Agent Reputation and Trust (ART) Testbed Architecture
,
2005,
CCIA.
[5]
K. Suzanne Barber,et al.
Challenges for Trust, Fraud and Deception Research in Multi-agent Systems
,
2002,
Trust, Reputation, and Security.
[6]
Laurent Vercouter,et al.
The Agent Reputation and Trust (ART) Testbed
,
2006,
iTrust.