Information Effects in Collective Preferences

Contrary to much of the literature on collective opinion, I find that the low levels and uneven social distribution of political knowledge in the mass public often cause opinion surveys to misrepresent the mix of voices in a society. To assess the bias introduced by information effects, I compare “fully informed†collective preferences simulated from actual survey data to collective preferences revealed in the original data. Analysis of policy questions from the 1988 and 1992 American National Election Studies shows that group differences in knowledge, along with the public's modest average level of political knowledge, can cause significant distortions in measures of collective opinion. The mass public may appear more progressive on some issues and more conservative on others than would be the case if all citizens were equally well informed. To the extent that opinion polls influence democratic politics, this suggests that information effects can impair the responsiveness of governments to their citizens.

[1]  Kathleen M. McGraw,et al.  An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[2]  Walter Lippmann,et al.  The public philosophy , 1956 .

[3]  Stephen Earl Bennetr.  Americans' Knowledge of Ideology, 1980-1992 , 1995 .

[4]  Bernard Grofman,et al.  Information pooling and group decision making : proceedings of the Second University of California, Irvine, Conference on Political Economy , 1986 .

[5]  P. Converse,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[6]  Benjamin I. Page.  Choices and echoes in Presidential elections , 1978 .

[7]  W. Rahn,et al.  Activation and application of political party stereotypes: The role of television , 1996 .

[8]  A. Lupia.  Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[9]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in American Policy Preferences , 1994 .

[10]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign , 1995 .

[11]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[12]  J. Zaller,et al.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1992 .

[13]  A. Tuchfarber,et al.  Effects of Filter Questions in Public Opinion Surveys , 1983 .

[14]  Kathleen M. McGraw,et al.  The Effects of General and Domain-Specific Expertise on Political Memory and Judgment , 1990 .

[15]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Psychological determinants of political opinionation , 1990 .

[16]  D. Wittman.  The myth of democratic failure : why political institutions are efficient , 1997 .

[17]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy , 1995 .

[18]  W. Connolly.  On 'Interests' in Politics , 1972 .

[19]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Linear probability, logit and probit models , 1984 .

[20]  W. Rahn,et al.  The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates , 1993 .

[21]  Dennis F. Kinsey,et al.  The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns , 1993 .

[22]  Michael X. Delli Carpini,et al.  An Analysis of Information Items on the 1990 and 1991 NES Surveys , 1992 .

[23]  R. Dahl,et al.  Democracy and Its Critics , 1990 .

[24]  Stephen L. Elkin.  Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform , 1991 .

[25]  G. E. Lang,et al.  The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate , 1987 .

[26]  K. Ladha.  The Condorcet Jury Theorem, Free Speech and Correlated Votes , 1992 .

[27]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences , 1992 .

[28]  Jeffery J. Mondak.  Question wording and mass policy preferences: The comparative impact of substantive information and peripheral cues , 1994 .

[29]  Michael X. Delli Carpini,et al.  Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First , 1993 .

[30]  S. Bennett,et al.  "Know-Nothings" Revisited: The Meaning of Political Ignorance Today. , 1988 .

[31]  M. Lodge,et al.  The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[32]  Gabriel A. Almond,et al.  The American people and foreign policy , 1950 .

[33]  Robert C. Luskin.  Measuring Political Sophistication , 1987 .

[34]  Brad Lockerbie.  The influence of levels of information on the use of prospective evaluations , 1991 .

[35]  Jane J. Mansbridge.  Beyond Adversary Democracy , 1980 .

[36]  S. Feldman.  Measuring Issue Preferences: The Problem of Response Instability , 1989, Political Analysis.

[37]  Scott L. Althaus.  Opinion polls, information effects, and political equality: Exploring ideological biases in collective opinion , 1996 .

[38]  Larry M. Bartels.  Uninformed Votes: Information E ects in Presidential Elections , 1996 .

[39]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology , 1991 .

[40]  G. King,et al.  Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference , 1989 .

[41]  James A. Stimson.  Belief Systems: Constraint, Complexity, and the 1972 Election , 1975 .

[42]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1954 .

[43]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  On the Varieties and Utilities of Political Expertise , 1990 .

[44]  James H. Kuklinski,et al.  Information and democratic processes , 1990 .

[45]  J. Banks,et al.  Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem , 1996, American Political Science Review.

[46]  A. Downs.  An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .

[47]  THE EFFECTS OF PRESTIGE NAMES IN QUESTION WORDING , 1990 .