Coordinated Control of Multiple Mobile Agents with Connectivity Preserving

Abstract The underlying topology of the network remaining connected frequently enough during the evolution is a basic assumption seen in many previous works on coordinated control in a network of multi-agent systems to guarantee the stability of the coordinated motion. However, for a given set of initial conditions, this assumption is very difficult to verify. In particular, connectivity of the initial network can not guarantee connectivity of the network during the evolution. In this paper, we propose a coordinated control protocol, which combines the roles of motion control and connectivity control. This protocol can enable the group to achieve velocity alignment and a desired group shape while preserving connectivity of the network during the evolution only if the initial network is connected. Moreover, we investigate the coordinated control with a virtual leader.

[1]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[2]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[3]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1998 .

[4]  Gordon F. Royle,et al.  Algebraic Graph Theory , 2001, Graduate texts in mathematics.

[5]  Kevin M. Passino,et al.  Stability analysis of swarms , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[6]  Jie Lin,et al.  Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[7]  R. Murray,et al.  Robust connectivity of networked vehicles , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[8]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[9]  K.M. Passino,et al.  Stability analysis of social foraging swarms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[10]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Controlling Connectivity of Dynamic Graphs , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[11]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[12]  Randal W. Beard,et al.  Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  Meng Ji,et al.  Distributed Formation Control While Preserving Connectedness , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  M. Spong,et al.  Stable flocking of multiple inertial agents on balanced graphs , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[15]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  W. Ren Consensus strategies for cooperative control of vehicle formations , 2007 .

[17]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Flocking while preserving network connectivity , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[18]  Ella M. Atkins,et al.  Distributed multi‐vehicle coordinated control via local information exchange , 2007 .

[19]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Flocking in Fixed and Switching Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  Kevin L. Moore,et al.  High-Order and Model Reference Consensus Algorithms in Cooperative Control of MultiVehicle Systems , 2007 .

[21]  Hassan K. Khalil,et al.  Nonlinear Systems Third Edition , 2008 .