Innovation through alliancing in a no-blame culture

Innovation occurs within the safety of a no-blame culture yet we see surprisingly scant literature on how this is facilitated within a construction project management context. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how innovation and promotion of innovative thinking in action is enabled through a no-blame culture in project alliances in Australia. We argue that innovation is dependent upon collaboration and true collaboration is inextricable linked to behavioural drivers. Foremost of these is a culture of openness and willingness to share the pain and gain from experimentation. Further, this culture requires that collaborators be protected from the threat of being blamed and held accountable for experimental failure.

[1]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Enthusiasm, commitment and project alliancing: an Australian experience , 2002 .

[2]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Learning to Manage Mega Projects: The case of BAA and Heathrow Terminal 5 , 2006 .

[3]  T. Das,et al.  Trust, Control, and Risk in Strategic Alliances: An Integrated Framework , 2001 .

[4]  Hap Smyth,et al.  Scoping the Management of Complex Projects: A Relationship Approach , 2006 .

[5]  Burton H. Klein,et al.  Application of Operations Research to Development Decisions , 1958 .

[6]  H. Smyth,et al.  The value of trust in project business , 2010 .

[7]  Colin Duffield,et al.  In pursuit of additional value: A benchmarking study into alliancing in the Australian Public Sector , 2009 .

[8]  D Walker,et al.  What Enables Project Success: Lessons from Aid Relief Projects , 2011 .

[9]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Project Management , 2011 .

[10]  Johannes T. Voordijk,et al.  Contracting dynamics in the competitive dialogue procedure , 2012 .

[11]  A. Kadefors.  Trust in project relationships-inside the black box , 2004 .

[12]  Marton Marosszeky,et al.  Constructing the Olympic Dream: A Future Perfect Strategy of Project Management , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[13]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[14]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Classics in project management: revisiting the past, creating the future , 2012 .

[15]  Steven A. Cavaleri,et al.  Are Learning Organizations Pragmatic , 2008 .

[16]  D. Walker.  Heathrow's T5 – History in the Making , 2013 .

[17]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Models of Construction Innovation , 1998 .

[18]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  Project alliances in the Australian construction industry: a case study of a water treatment project , 2006 .

[19]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  A Brief History of Project Management , 2011 .

[20]  Hedley Smyth,et al.  Collaborative Relationships in Construction: Developing Frameworks and Networks , 2008 .

[21]  H. Voordijk,et al.  Reducing opportunistic behaviour through a project alliance , 2011 .

[22]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Procurement strategies : a relationship-based approach , 2003 .

[23]  D. Christenson,et al.  Understanding the Role of “Vision” in Project Success , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[24]  Katinka M. Bijlsma-Frankema,et al.  Understanding the Trust-Control Nexus , 2005 .

[25]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  Dealing with uncertainty in complex projects: revisiting Klein and Meckling , 2012 .

[26]  Carolyn Axtell,et al.  Building better work places through individual perspective taking: A fresh look at a fundamental human process , 2008 .

[27]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust And Distrust: New Relationships and Realities , 1998 .

[28]  Hedley Smyth,et al.  Trust in the Design Team , 2005 .

[29]  H. Smyth,et al.  Relationship management in the management of PFI/PPP projects in the UK , 2007 .

[30]  Kaj U. Koskinen.  Organizational Learning in Project-Based Companies: A Process Thinking Approach , 2012 .

[31]  Thomas Lechler,et al.  Gantt charts revisited: A critical analysis of its roots and implications to the management of projects today , 2012 .