Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses

There is considerable debate about whether the early processing of sounds depends on whether they form part of speech. Proponents of such speech specificity postulate the existence of language-dependent memory traces, which are activated in the processing of speech1–3 but not when equally complex, acoustic non-speech stimuli are processed. Here we report the existence of these traces in the human brain. We presented to Finnish subjects the Finnish phoneme prototype /e/ as the frequent stimulus, and other Finnish phoneme prototypes or a non-prototype (the Estonian prototype /õ/) as the infrequent stimulus. We found that the brain's automatic change-detection response, reflected electrically as the mismatch negativity (MMN)4–10, was enhanced when the infrequent, deviant stimulus was a prototype (the Finnish /ö/) relative to when it was a non-prototype (the Estonian /õ/). These phonemic traces, revealed by MMN, are language-specific, as /õ/ caused enhancement of MMN in Estonians. Whole-head magnetic recordings11,12 located the source of this native-language, phoneme-related response enhancement, and thus the language-specific memory traces, in the auditory cortex of the left hemisphere.

[1]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .

[3]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[4]  J S Buchwald,et al.  Factors that affect the amplitudes and latencies of the vertex short latency acoustic responses in the cat. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  G. Romani,et al.  Auditory evoked magnetic fields and electric potentials , 1990 .

[6]  P. Kuhl.  Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Glottal wave analysis with Pitch Synchronous Iterative Adaptive Inverse Filtering , 1991, Speech Commun..

[8]  R. Näätänen.  Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[9]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[10]  Lauri Parkkonen,et al.  A 122-channel whole-cortex SQUID system for measuring the brain's magnetic fields , 1993 .

[11]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[12]  R Näätänen,et al.  Phonetic invariance in the human auditory cortex. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[13]  Patricia K. Kohl.  Early linguistic experience and phonetic perception: implications for theories of developmental speech perception , 1993 .

[14]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory , 1994, Nature.

[15]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography in studies of human cognitive brain function , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  R. Näätänen.  The Mismatch Negativity: A Powerful Tool for Cognitive Neuroscience , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[17]  F. Perrin,et al.  Separate Representation of Stimulus Frequency, Intensity, and Duration in Auditory Sensory Memory: An Event-Related Potential and Dipole-Model Analysis , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Explaining the Dispersion of the Single-Vowel Occurrences in an F1/F2 Space , 1995, Phonetica.

[19]  R Hari,et al.  Deviant auditory stimuli activate human left and right auditory cortex differently. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  T. Carrell,et al.  Auditory Neurophysiologic Responses and Discrimination Deficits in Children with Learning Problems , 1996, Science.

[21]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Processing of complex sounds in the human auditory cortex as revealed by magnetic brain responses. , 1996, Psychophysiology.