Technology selection in the presence of imprecise data, weight restrictions, and nondiscretionary factors

Technology selection is an important part of management of technology. Traditionally, technology selection models are based on cardinal data with less emphasis on ordinal data. However, with respect to technology selection complexity, emphasis has shifted to the simultaneous consideration of cardinal and ordinal data in technology selection process. The application of data envelopment analysis (DEA) for technology selection problems is based on total flexibility of the weights. However, the problem of allowing total flexibility of the weights is that the values of the weights obtained by solving the unrestricted DEA program are often in contradiction to prior views or additional available information. On the other hand, current models of technology selection problems assume complete discretion of decision-making criteria and do not assume technology selection in the conditions that some factors are nondiscretionary. To select the best technologies in the presence of cardinal data, ordinal data, nondiscretionary factors, and weight restrictions, the objective of this paper is to propose a new pair of assurance region-nondiscretionary factors-imprecise data envelopment analysis (AR-NF-IDEA) models. A numerical example demonstrates the application of the proposed method.

[1]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Restricting virtual weights in data envelopment analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  L. Seiford,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis in the Presence of Both Quantitative and Qualitative Factors , 1996 .

[3]  Moutaz Khouja,et al.  The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection , 1995 .

[4]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): A review and improvement with an application , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  E. E. Karsak *,et al.  Practical common weight multi-criteria decision-making approach with an improved discriminating power for technology selection , 2005 .

[6]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A decision model for selecting technology suppliers in the presence of nondiscretionary factors , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[7]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A decision model for technology selection in the existence of both cardinal and ordinal data , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[8]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[9]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  Evaluating and selecting investments in industrial robots , 1999 .

[10]  L. Seiford,et al.  Context-dependent data envelopment analysis—Measuring attractiveness and progress , 2003 .

[11]  Ram Rachamadugu,et al.  A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection , 1997 .

[12]  W. Cooper,et al.  Idea and Ar-Idea: Models for Dealing with Imprecise Data in Dea , 1999 .

[13]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  A cone-ratio DEA approach for AMT justification , 2000 .

[14]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  A nonparametric stochastic procedure for FMS evaluation , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  R Ramanathan,et al.  Comparative Risk Assessment of Energy Supply Technologies: a Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2001 .

[16]  William W. CooperKyung IDEA and AR-IDEA: Models for Dealing with Imprecise Data in DEA , 1999 .

[17]  Reza Farzipoor Saen An algorithm for ranking technology suppliers in the presence of nondiscretionary factors , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[18]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[19]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[20]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming , 1989 .

[21]  F. T. S. Chan *,et al.  Fuzzy goal-programming model with an artificial immune system (AIS) approach for a machine tool selection and operation allocation problem in a flexible manufacturing system , 2005 .

[22]  WangYing-Ming,et al.  Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis , 2005 .

[23]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  A decision model for evaluation of flexible manufacturing systems in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal factors , 1999 .

[25]  Rahul Rai,et al.  Disassembly sequence generation: A Petri net based heuristic approach , 2002 .

[26]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A unified framework for the selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System , 1995 .

[27]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[28]  Gang Yu,et al.  An Illustrative Application of Idea (Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) to a Korean Mobile Telecommunication Company , 2001, Oper. Res..

[29]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[30]  Rahul Rai,et al.  Machine-tool selection and operation allocation in FMS: Solving a fuzzy goal-programming model using a genetic algorithm , 2002 .

[31]  Jun-Ing Ker,et al.  Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based group decision support system to select and evaluate new manufacturing technologies , 2007 .

[32]  William W. Cooper,et al.  IDEA (Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) with CMDs (Column Maximum Decision Making Units) , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..