Quality of decision making and group norms.

Two studies investigated the impact of group norms for maintaining consensus versus norms for critical thought on group decisions in a modification of the biased sampling paradigm (G. Stasser & W. Titus, 1985). Both studies showed that critical norms improved the quality of decisions, whereas consensus norms did not. This effect appeared to be mediated by the perceived value of shared and unshared information: Consensus norm groups valued shared information more highly than critical groups did, and valence was a good predictor of decision outcome. In addition, the 2nd study showed that the group norm manipulation has no impact on individual decisions, consistent with the assumption that this is a group effect. Results suggest that the content of group norms is an important factor influencing the quality of group decision-making processes and that the content of group norms may be related to the group's proneness for groupthink.

[1]  L. Doob.  The psychology of social norms. , 1937 .

[2]  F. H. Hankins,et al.  The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .

[3]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  D. Campbell,et al.  The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[5]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors. , 1976 .

[6]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization , 1977 .

[7]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[8]  M. Fishbein.  Progress in social psychology , 1980 .

[9]  Craig E. Spitzer,et al.  The effects of consensus requirements and multiple decisions on mock juror verdict preferences , 1981 .

[10]  N. Kerr.  Effects of Prior Juror Experience on Juror Behavior , 1981 .

[11]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[12]  C. Nemeth.  Jury Trials: Psychology And Law1 , 1981 .

[13]  John Thibaut,et al.  Seniority in the generational transition of laboratory groups: The effects of social familiarity and task experience☆ , 1982 .

[14]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[15]  K. Weick.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. 2nd ed. , 1984 .

[16]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Individual and group reward allocation decisions in two situational contexts: Effects of relative need and performance. , 1985 .

[17]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[18]  W. H. Jones,et al.  Shyness: conceptualization and measurement. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Charles E. Miller,et al.  Some social psychological effects of group decision rules. , 1987 .

[21]  Charles E. Miller,et al.  Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. , 1987 .

[22]  G. Stasser,et al.  Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. , 1987 .

[23]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. , 1989 .

[24]  J. Levine,et al.  Progress in Small Group Research , 1990 .

[25]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[26]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[27]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A “thought experiment”☆ , 1992 .

[28]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action , 1992 .

[29]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity , 1992 .

[30]  M. Diehl,et al.  Why Groups are less Effective than their Members: On Productivity Losses in Idea-generating Groups , 1994 .

[31]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups , 1994 .

[32]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  A. Hollingshead.  The Rank-Order Effect in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[35]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[36]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[37]  Aaron M. Brower,et al.  What's Social about Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups , 1996 .

[38]  A. Van Hiel,et al.  Effects of Partially Shared Information and Awareness of Unshared Information on Information Sampling , 1996 .

[39]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Management of information in small groups. , 1996 .

[40]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Styles of group discussion in computer-mediated decision making , 1997 .

[42]  Robert S. Baron,et al.  The eyes have it : Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion , 1997 .

[43]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Leadership Style and the Discussion of Shared and Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups , 1998 .

[44]  Garold Stasser,et al.  The sampling of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the role of an informed minority , 1998 .

[45]  P. Paulus,et al.  Developing Consensus about Groupthink after All These Years. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[46]  T. Postmes,et al.  Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[47]  Robert S. Billings,et al.  Accountability and the discussion of unshared, critical information in decision-making groups. , 1998 .

[48]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: the pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Information Sampling in Decision-Making Groups , 1998 .

[50]  Esser,et al.  Alive and Well after 25 Years: A Review of Groupthink Research. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[51]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Information Pooling: When It Impacts Group Decision Making , 1998 .

[52]  S S Lam,et al.  Improving group decisions by better pooling information: a comparative advantage of group decision support systems. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[53]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling Unshared Information: The Benefits of Knowing How Access to Information Is Distributed among Group Members , 2000 .

[54]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity on Group Behavior , 2001 .

[55]  D. Cremer,et al.  Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach , 2001 .

[56]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? Side-Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication. , 2002 .