Gaussian imaging transformation for the paraxial Debye formulation of the focal region in a low-Fresnel-number optical system

The Debye formulation of focused fields has been systematically used to evaluate, for example, the point-spread function of an optical imaging system. According to this approximation, the focal wave field exhibits some symmetries about the geometrical focus. However, certain discrepancies arise when the Fresnel number, as viewed from focus, is close to unity. In that case, we should use the Kirchhoff formulation to evaluate accurately the three-dimensional amplitude distribution of the field in the focal region. We make some important remarks regarding both diffraction theories. In the end we demonstrate that, in the paraxial regime, given a defocused transverse pattern in the Debye approximation, it is possible to find a similar pattern but magnified and situated at another plane within the Kirchhoff theory. Moreover, we may evaluate this correspondence as the action of a virtual thin lens located at the focal plane and whose focus is situated at the axial point of the aperture plane. As a result, we give a geometrical interpretation of the focal-shift effect and present a brief comment on the problem of the best-focus location.

[1]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[2]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1976 .

[3]  W T Rhodes,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging: a space invariant model for space variant systems. , 1990, Applied optics.

[4]  M. P. Givens Focal shifts in diffracted converging spherical waves , 1982 .

[5]  A. Arimoto Intensity Distribution of Aberration-free Diffraction Patterns Due to Circular Apertures in Large F-number Optical Systems , 1976 .

[6]  Colin J. R. Sheppard,et al.  Axial behavior of pupil-plane filters , 1988 .

[7]  M. Gu,et al.  Principles Of Three-Dimensional Imaging In Confocal Microscopes , 1996 .

[8]  Jakob J. Stamnes,et al.  Focusing of two-dimensional waves , 1981 .

[9]  V. Mahajan Uniform versus Gaussian beams: a comparison of the effects of diffraction, obscuration, and aberrations , 1986 .

[10]  Yajun Li,et al.  Conditions for the validity of the Debye integral representation of focused fields , 1981 .

[11]  Genaro Saavedra,et al.  On-axis irradiance for spherically aberrated optical systems with obscured rectangular apertures: A study using the Wigner distribution function , 1998 .

[12]  E. Wolf,et al.  Symmetry properties of focused fields. , 1980, Optics letters.

[13]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Axial irradiance and optimum focusing of laser beams. , 1983, Applied Optics.

[14]  J. Stamnes Waves in Focal Regions: Propagation, Diffraction and Focusing of Light, Sound and Water Waves , 1986 .

[15]  Pedro Andrés,et al.  Effective Fresnel-number concept for evaluating the relative focal shift in focused beams , 1998 .

[16]  E. Wolf,et al.  Three-dimensional intensity distribution near the focus in systems of different Fresnel numbers , 1984 .

[17]  N. Streibl Three-dimensional imaging by a microscope , 1985 .

[18]  J. Stamnes,et al.  Focusing at small angular apertures in the debye and Kirchhoff approximations , 1981 .

[19]  C. Sheppard Imaging in optical systems of finite Fresnel number , 1986 .

[20]  M Martínez-Corral,et al.  On-axis diffractional behavior of two-dimensional pupils. , 1994, Applied optics.

[21]  J. P. Woerdman,et al.  Measurement of the three-dimensional intensity distribution in the neighborhood of a paraxial focus. , 1997, Applied optics.

[22]  Donald L. Snyder,et al.  Imaging a randomly moving object from quantum-limited data: applications to image recovery from second- and third-order autocorrelations , 1991 .

[23]  Yajun Li,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Diffraction Patterns in Low-fresnel-number Focusing Systems , 1983 .