Stabilized estimates of Hotelling-observer detection performance in patient-structured noise

This paper addresses the question of how to determine the performance of the optimum linear or Hotelling observer when only sample images are available. This observer is specified by a template from which a scalar test statistic is computed for each image. It is argued that estimation of the Hotelling template is analogous to problems in image reconstruction , where many difficulties can be avoided through judicious use of prior information. In the present problem, prior information is enforced by choice of the representation used for the template. We consider specifically a representation based on Laguerre-Gauss functions, and we discuss ways of estimating the coefficients in this expansion from sample images for the problem of detection of a known signal. The method is illustrated by two experiments, one based on simulated nonuniform fields called lumpy backgrounds, the other on real coronary angiograms.

[1]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  H H Barrett,et al.  Hotelling trace criterion and its correlation with human-observer performance. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Human vs model observers in anatomic backgrounds , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[4]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Lesion detection in structured noise. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[5]  H H Barrett,et al.  Cone-beam tomography with discrete data sets. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Linear discriminants and image quality , 1991, Image Vis. Comput..

[7]  Jie Yao,et al.  Predicting human performance by a channelized Hotelling observer model , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[8]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Hotelling trace criterion as a figure of merit for the optimization of imaging systems , 1986 .

[9]  H. Barrett,et al.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  B. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Practical issues and methodology in assessment of image quality using model observers , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm. I. Theory , 1994 .

[13]  Robert F. Wagner,et al.  Prewhitening matched filter: practical implementation, SNR estimation, and bias reduction , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[14]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  Robin N. Strickland,et al.  Channelized detection filters for detecting tumors in nuclear medical images , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[16]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Aperture optimization for emission imaging: effect of a spatially varying background. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Bayesian Detection of Random Signals on Random Backgrounds , 1997, IPMI.

[19]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Some unlikely properties of the likelihood ratio and its logarithm , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[20]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Observer signal-to-noise ratios for the ML-EM algorithm , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[21]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[22]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Generalized NEQ: Fourier analysis where you would least expect to find it , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[23]  J. Breslin.  The University of Arizona , 2000 .

[24]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.