Hydrothermal exploration of mid-ocean ridges: Where might the largest sulfide deposits be forming?

Highlights • “Black Smokers” on slow-spreading ridges can host larger seafloor massive sulfide (SMS) deposits than on fast ridges. • The largest slow-ridge SMS deposits are typically associated with long-lived tectonic fractures ± sustained fluid flow. • Ultramafic-, tectonic-hosted sites exhibit high average Cu (> 10wt.%) and Au (> 3ppm) contents in their surface SMS samples. • Hydrothermal plume surveys are consistent with equal abundances of magmatic vs tectonic vent-control along ultraslow ridges. • The first “Black Smokers” on any ultraslow ridges exhibit high Cu ± Au SMS contents at both magmatic and tectonic vent-sites. Abstract Here, we review the relationship between the distribution of modern-day seafloor hydrothermal activity along the global mid-ocean ridge crest and the nature of the mineral deposits being formed at those sites. Since the first discovery of seafloor venting, a sustained body of exploration has now prospected for one form of hydrothermal activity in particular – high temperature “black smoker” venting – along > 30% of the global mid-ocean ridge crest. While that still leaves most of that ~ 60,000 km continuous network to be explored, some important trends have already emerged. First, it is now known that submarine venting can occur along all mid-ocean ridges, regardless of spreading rate, and in all ocean basins. Further, to a first approximation, the abundance of currently active venting, as deduced from water column plume signals, can be scaled linearly with seafloor spreading rate (a simple proxy for magmatic heat-flux). What can also be recognized, however, is that there is an “excess” of high temperature venting along slow and ultra-slow spreading ridges when compared to what was originally predicted from seafloor spreading/magmatic heat-budget models. An examination of hydrothermal systems tracked to source on the slow spreading Mid-Atlantic Ridge reveals that no more than half of the sites responsible for the “black smoker” plume signals observed in the overlying water column are associated with magmatic systems comparable to those known from fast-spreading ridges. The other half of all currently known active high-temperature submarine systems on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge are hosted under tectonic control. These systems appear both to be longer-lived than, and to give rise to much larger sulfide deposits than, their magmatic counterparts — presumably as a result of sustained fluid flow. A majority of these tectonic-hosted systems also involve water–rock interaction with ultramafic sources. Importantly, from a mineral resource perspective, this subset of tectonic-hosted vent-sites also represents the only actively-forming seafloor massive sulfide deposits on mid-ocean ridges that exhibit high concentrations of Cu and Au in their surface samples (> 10 wt.% average Cu content and > 3 ppm average Au). Along ultraslow-spreading ridges, first detailed examinations of hydrothermally active sites suggest that sulfide deposit formation at those sites may depart even further from the spreading-rate model than slow-spreading ridges do. Hydrothermal plume distributions along ultraslow ridges follow the same (~ 50:50) distribution of “black smoker” plume signals between magmatic and tectonic settings as the slow spreading MAR. However, the first three “black smoker” sites tracked to source on any ultra-slow ridges have all revealed high temperature vent-sites that host large polymetallic sulfide deposits in both magmatic as well as tectonic settings. Further, deposits in both types of setting have now been revealed to exhibit moderate to high concentrations of Cu and Au, respectively. An important implication is that ultra-slow ridges may represent the strongest mineral resource potential for the global ridge crest, despite being host to the lowest magmatic heat budget.

[1]  R. Ballard,et al.  Massive deep-sea sulphide ore deposits discovered on the East Pacific Rise , 1979, Nature.

[2]  F N Spiess,et al.  East Pacific Rise: Hot Springs and Geophysical Experiments , 1980, Science.

[3]  R. Lowell,et al.  Characteristics of magma‐driven hydrothermal systems at oceanic spreading centers , 2013 .

[4]  J. Gee,et al.  The cooling history and the depth of detachment faulting at the Atlantis Massif oceanic core complex , 2012 .

[5]  Paul A. Tyler,et al.  Deep-Water Chemosynthetic Ecosystem Research during the Census of Marine Life Decade and Beyond: A Proposed Deep-Ocean Road Map , 2011, PloS one.

[6]  J. Escartín,et al.  Oceanic detachment faults focus very large volumes of black smoker fluids , 2007 .

[7]  E. Baker,et al.  Where are the undiscovered hydrothermal vents on oceanic spreading ridges , 2015 .

[8]  R. R. Cave,et al.  Fluxes to sediments underlying the Rainbow hydrothermal plume at 36°14?N on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 2002 .

[9]  P. Rona,et al.  Black smokers, massive sulphides and vent biota at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 1986, Nature.

[10]  M. Hannington,et al.  Sea-floor tectonics and submarine hydrothermal systems , 2005 .

[11]  Xuefa Shi,et al.  The occurrence of gold in hydrothermal sulfide at Southwest Indian Ridge 49.6°E , 2012, Acta Oceanologica Sinica.

[12]  C. Langmuir,et al.  Hydrothermal venting in magma deserts: The ultraslow‐spreading Gakkel and Southwest Indian Ridges , 2004 .

[13]  E. Baker,et al.  Submarine hydrothermal activity along the mid‐Kermadec Arc, New Zealand: Large‐scale effects on venting , 2007 .

[14]  David L. Williams,et al.  Submarine Thermal Springs on the Gal�pagos Rift , 1979, Science.

[15]  Christopher R. German,et al.  Pathways for abiotic organic synthesis at submarine hydrothermal fields , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  L. Parson,et al.  Non-transform offsets along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge south of the Azores (38°N–34°N): ultramafic exposures and hosting of hydrothermal vents , 2000 .

[17]  B. Murton,et al.  Geological setting and ecology of the Broken Spur hydrothermal vent field: 29°10′N on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 1995, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[18]  M. Lilley,et al.  Discovery of a black smoker vent field and vent fauna at the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge , 2010, Nature communications.

[19]  C. German,et al.  Hydrothermal Activity on the Southern Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 2002 .

[20]  S. Humphris,et al.  Kinematics and geometry of active detachment faulting beneath the Trans-Atlantic Geotraverse (TAG) hydrothermal field on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 2007 .

[21]  J. Reyss,et al.  Hydrothermal activity on a 105‐year scale at a slow‐spreading ridge, TAG hydrothermal field, Mid‐Atlantic Ridge 26°N , 1995 .

[22]  A. McCaig,et al.  Hydrothermal circulation and the dike-gabbro transition in the detachment mode of slow seafloor spreading , 2012 .

[23]  Kenneth H. Rubin,et al.  New insights into mid-ocean ridge volcanic processes from the 2005–2006 eruption of the East Pacific Rise, 9°46′N–9°56′N , 2007 .

[24]  E. Baker,et al.  Discovery of ancient and active hydrothermal systems along the ultra‐slow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge 10°–16°E , 2002 .

[25]  M. Leybourne,et al.  Metallogenesis and Mineralization of Intraoceanic Arcs I: Kermadec Arc—Introduction , 2012 .

[26]  S. Petersen,et al.  Fault geometry and permeability contrast control vent temperatures at the Logatchev 1 hydrothermal field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 2015 .

[27]  E. Baker,et al.  An authoritative global database for active submarine hydrothermal vent fields , 2013 .

[28]  C. German,et al.  Sustained volcanically-hosted venting at ultraslow ridges: Piccard Hydrothermal Field, Mid-Cayman Rise , 2013 .

[29]  W. Seyfried,et al.  Vent fluid chemistry of the Rainbow hydrothermal system (36°N, MAR): Phase equilibria and in situ pH controls on subseafloor alteration processes , 2011 .

[30]  E. Baker,et al.  Hydrothermal activity along the southwest Indian ridge , 1998, Nature.

[31]  Jian Lin,et al.  Mineralogical and geochemical features of sulfide chimneys from the 49°39′E hydrothermal field on the Southwest Indian Ridge and their geological inferences , 2011 .

[32]  J. Karson,et al.  An example of a recent accretion on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: the Snake Pit neovolcanic ridge (MARK area, 23°22′N) , 1991 .

[33]  C. German,et al.  Hydrothermal activity on the Reykjanes Ridge: the Steinahóll vent-field at 63°06′N , 1994 .

[34]  C. German,et al.  Evolution and Biogeography of Deep-Sea Vent and Seep Invertebrates , 2002, Science.

[35]  D. Yoerger,et al.  Young volcanism and related hydrothermal activity at 5°S on the slow‐spreading southern Mid‐Atlantic Ridge , 2007 .

[36]  Y. Marcon,et al.  Megafaunal distribution and assessment of total methane and sulfide consumption by mussel beds at Menez Gwen hydrothermal vent, based on geo-referenced photomosaics , 2013 .

[37]  K. V. Von Damm,et al.  Geochemical controls on hydrothermal fluids from the Kairei and Edmond Vent Fields, 23°–25°S, Central Indian Ridge , 2006 .

[38]  D. Yoerger,et al.  First active hydrothermal vents on an ultraslow-spreading center: Southwest Indian Ridge , 2012 .

[39]  B. Murton,et al.  Geology, sulfide geochemistry and supercritical venting at the Beebe Hydrothermal Vent Field, Cayman Trough , 2015 .

[40]  I. Grevemeyer,et al.  Microseismicity of the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge at 7°S–8°15′S and at the Logatchev Massif oceanic core complex at 14°40′N–14°50′N , 2013 .

[41]  F. Barriga,et al.  Mineralogy and geochemistry of hydrothermal sediments from the serpentinite-hosted Saldanha hydrothermal field (36°34′N; 33°26′W) at MAR , 2006 .

[42]  J. Morgan,et al.  Dependence of ridge-axis morphology on magma supply and spreading rate , 1993, Nature.

[43]  Thomas Monecke,et al.  Constraints on Water Depth of Massive Sulfide Formation: Evidence from Modern Seafloor Hydrothermal Systems in Arc-Related Settings , 2014 .

[44]  E. Baker,et al.  The relationship between near-axis hydrothermal cooling and the spreading rate of mid-ocean ridges , 1996 .

[45]  Deborah S. Kelley,et al.  An off-axis hydrothermal vent field near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge at 30° N , 2001, Nature.

[46]  Y. Fouquet,et al.  Seafloor Massive Sulfides from the Northern Equatorial Mid-Atlantic Ridge: New Discoveries and Perspectives , 2010 .

[47]  Y. Fouquet,et al.  Detailed Study of Three Contiguous Segments of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, South of the Azores (37° N to 38°30′ N), Using Acoustic Imaging Coupled with Submersible Observations , 1997 .

[48]  C. German,et al.  Distributions of hydrothermal activity along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: interplay of magmatic and tectonic controls , 1998 .

[49]  C. Langmuir,et al.  Discovery of abundant hydrothermal venting on the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel ridge in the Arctic Ocean , 2003, Nature.

[50]  C. German,et al.  Hydrothermal exploration near the Azores Triple Junction: tectonic control of venting at slow-spreading ridges? , 1996 .

[51]  M. Hannington,et al.  The abundance of seafloor massive sulfide deposits , 2011 .

[52]  C. German,et al.  Geotectonic setting of hydrothermal activity on the summit of Lucky Strike Seamount (37°17′N, Mid‐Atlantic Ridge) , 2002 .