Invariant object recognition is a personalized selection of invariant features in humans, not simply explained by hierarchical feed-forward vision models
暂无分享,去创建一个
Nasour Bagheri | Reza Ebrahimpour | Hamid Karimi-Rouzbahani | R. Ebrahimpour | H. Karimi-Rouzbahani | N. Bagheri
[1] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. Recurrent convolutional neural networks: a better model of biological object recognition under occlusion , 2017 .
[2] S. P. Arun,et al. Do Computational Models Differ Systematically from Human Object Perception? , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[3] Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al. Task alters category representations in prefrontal but not high-level visual cortex , 2017, NeuroImage.
[4] David J. Freedman,et al. Preferential Encoding of Visual Categories in Parietal Cortex Compared to Prefrontal Cortex , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.
[5] David C. Knill,et al. Object classification for human and ideal observers , 1995, Vision Research.
[6] T. Poggio,et al. What and where: A Bayesian inference theory of attention , 2010, Vision Research.
[7] Tomoyasu Horikawa,et al. Generic decoding of seen and imagined objects using hierarchical visual features , 2015, Nature Communications.
[8] Antonio Torralba,et al. Comparison of deep neural networks to spatio-temporal cortical dynamics of human visual object recognition reveals hierarchical correspondence , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[9] Nicole C. Rust,et al. Selectivity and Tolerance (“Invariance”) Both Increase as Visual Information Propagates from Cortical Area V4 to IT , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[10] Reza Ebrahimpour,et al. Feedforward object-vision models only tolerate small image variations compared to human , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[11] Irving Biederman,et al. Sensitivity to nonaccidental properties across various shape dimensions , 2012, Vision Research.
[12] Manfred Fahle,et al. Ultra Rapid Object Categorization: Effects of Level, Animacy and Context , 2013, PloS one.
[13] Shimon Ullman,et al. Atoms of recognition in human and computer vision , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[14] Davide Zoccolan,et al. Multifeatural Shape Processing in Rats Engaged in Invariant Visual Object Recognition , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[15] Rufin VanRullen,et al. The power of the feed-forward sweep , 2008, Advances in cognitive psychology.
[16] Kristina J. Nielsen,et al. Discrimination Strategies of Humans and Rhesus Monkeys for Complex Visual Displays , 2006, Current Biology.
[17] Frédéric Gosselin,et al. Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks , 2001, Vision Research.
[18] Nasour Bagheri,et al. Hard-wired feed-forward visual mechanisms of the brain compensate for affine variations in object recognition , 2017, Neuroscience.
[19] Carlo Baldassi,et al. Shape Similarity, Better than Semantic Membership, Accounts for the Structure of Visual Object Representations in a Population of Monkey Inferotemporal Neurons , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[20] Hans P. Op de Beeck,et al. A Multivariate Approach Reveals the Behavioral Templates Underlying Visual Discrimination in Rats , 2012, Current Biology.
[21] Blake W. Johnson,et al. A high density ERP comparison of mental rotation and mental size transformation , 2003, Brain and Cognition.
[22] Daniel L. K. Yamins,et al. Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognition , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[23] Andrea Vedaldi,et al. MatConvNet: Convolutional Neural Networks for MATLAB , 2014, ACM Multimedia.
[24] Ha Hong,et al. Explicit information for category-orthogonal object properties increases along the ventral stream , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.
[25] K. Fujii,et al. Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..
[26] P. Schyns,et al. Nonaccidental Properties Underlie Shape Recognition in Mammalian and Nonmammalian Vision , 2007, Current Biology.
[27] Michel Vidal-Naquet,et al. Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[28] Sina Salehi,et al. Low dimensional representation of face space by face‐selective inferior temporal neurons , 2017, The European journal of neuroscience.
[29] Elias B. Issa,et al. Precedence of the Eye Region in Neural Processing of Faces , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[30] A. Norcia,et al. A Representational Similarity Analysis of the Dynamics of Object Processing Using Single-Trial EEG Classification , 2015, PloS one.
[31] Kristina J. Nielsen,et al. Object features used by humans and monkeys to identify rotated shapes. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[32] Nasour Bagheri,et al. Average activity, but not variability, is the dominant factor in the representation of object categories in the brain , 2017, Neuroscience.
[33] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.
[34] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. Deep Supervised, but Not Unsupervised, Models May Explain IT Cortical Representation , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[35] Davide Zoccolan,et al. Object similarity affects the perceptual strategy underlying invariant visual object recognition in rats , 2015, Front. Neural Circuits.
[36] Frederick A. A. Kingdom,et al. Shape recognition: convexities, concavities and things in between , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[37] K. Grill-Spector,et al. The functional architecture of the ventral temporal cortex and its role in categorization , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[38] Nicolas Pinto,et al. Why is Real-World Visual Object Recognition Hard? , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[39] James J. DiCarlo,et al. How Does the Brain Solve Visual Object Recognition? , 2012, Neuron.
[40] Michael J. Tarr. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural description or by multiple views , 1995 .
[41] Caroline Blais,et al. The spatio-temporal dynamics of visual letter recognition , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[42] Matthijs C. Dorst. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .
[43] J. M. Hupé,et al. Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons , 1998, Nature.
[44] Cordelia Schmid,et al. Aggregating local descriptors into a compact image representation , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[45] Joseph R. Madsen,et al. Spatiotemporal Dynamics Underlying Object Completion in Human Ventral Visual Cortex , 2014, Neuron.
[46] Ha Hong,et al. Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[47] Thomas A. Carlson,et al. Representational dynamics of object recognition: Feedforward and feedback information flows , 2016, NeuroImage.
[48] David Cox,et al. Recurrent computations for visual pattern completion , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[49] Wendy L. Braje,et al. Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise , 1995, Vision Research.
[50] Ting Li,et al. Comparing machines and humans on a visual categorization test , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[51] Tim Curran,et al. The Limits of Feedforward Vision: Recurrent Processing Promotes Robust Object Recognition when Objects Are Degraded , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[52] Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al. Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine , 1998, Cognition.
[53] Trevor Darrell,et al. Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation , 2013, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[54] Thomas Serre,et al. Explaining the Timing of Natural Scene Understanding with a Computational Model of Perceptual Categorization , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[55] David J. Jilk,et al. Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition , 2011, Frontiers in Psychology.
[56] Isabel Gauthier,et al. Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.
[57] P. Schyns,et al. Non-accidental properties underlie shape recognition in mammalian and non-mammalian vision , 2007 .
[58] P. Milner. A model for visual shape recognition. , 1974, Psychological review.
[59] Andrew Faulkner,et al. Vividness of Visual Imagery and Incidental Recall of Verbal Cues, When Phenomenological Availability Reflects Long-Term Memory Accessibility , 2013, Front. Psychology.
[60] Shimon Ullman,et al. Basic-level categorization of intermediate complexity fragments reveals top-down effects of expertise in visual perception. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[61] Gabriel Kreiman,et al. A role for recurrent processing in object completion: neurophysiological, psychophysical and computational"evidence , 2014, 1409.2942.
[62] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[63] Bill Triggs,et al. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).
[64] Matthias Bethge,et al. Comparing deep neural networks against humans: object recognition when the signal gets weaker , 2017, ArXiv.
[65] Jesper Mogensen,et al. Place learning and object recognition by rats subjected to transection of the fimbria-fornix and/or ablation of the prefrontal cortex , 2004, Brain Research Bulletin.
[66] T. Poggio,et al. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.