From appearing to disappearing ephemeral adaptation for small screens

This paper presents two forms of adaptive menus for small devices (smart phones). Contrary to the Ephemeral appearing adaptation proposed by Findlater et al. [7], we claim for disappearing adaptation. The first form is named In Context Disappearing (ICD); the second one Out of Context Disappearing (OCD). The principle of ICD is to display predictive information in a prompting window placed above the main list. The prompting window disappears gradually while maintaining the context always visible and directly accessible. In case of low level prediction, ICD enables user to reach its target without waiting for disappearing effect. OCD principle is almost the same except that the disappearing prompting window covers the full page and thus is out of context like Findlater's approach. Our study shows that for small devices "fading out" a contextual window is better than "fading in". We demonstrate the benefit of these new forms of adaptation through an experiment with 24 subjects. We conclude that (1) ICD and OCD adaptive lists support faster selection than Control condition when the level of prediction is high, slower in case of bad prediction, and that (2) ICD is faster than OCD in case of bad prediction.

[1]  Monica M. C. Schraefel,et al.  An empirical assessment of adaptation techniques , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[2]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  A predictive model of menu performance , 2007, CHI.

[3]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Evaluating Reduced-Functionality Interfaces According to Feature Findability and Awareness , 2007, INTERACT.

[4]  Gilles Bailly,et al.  Leaf Menus: Linear Menus with Stroke Shortcuts for Small Handheld Devices , 2009, INTERACT.

[5]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Impact of screen size on performance, awareness, and user satisfaction with adaptive graphical user interfaces , 2008, CHI.

[6]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Split menus: effectively using selection frequency to organize menus , 1994, TCHI.

[7]  Eric McCreath,et al.  Inducing shortcuts on a mobile phone interface , 2006, IUI '06.

[8]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Predictability and accuracy in adaptive user interfaces , 2008, CHI.

[9]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Ephemeral adaptation: the use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance , 2009, CHI.

[10]  B. Shneiderman Promoting universal usability with multi-layer interface design , 2002, CUU '03.

[11]  Jean Vanderdonckt,et al.  Graceful degradation of user interfaces as a design method for multiplatform systems , 2004, IUI '04.

[12]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Fisheye menus , 2000, UIST '00.

[13]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Design Space and Evaluation Challenges of Adaptive Graphical User Interfaces , 2009, AI Mag..

[14]  J. Mitchell,et al.  Dynamic versus static menus: an exploratory comparison , 1989, SGCH.

[15]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  Patina: dynamic heatmaps for visualizing application usage , 2013, CHI.

[16]  Nadine Mandran,et al.  Wavelet menus on handheld devices: stacking metaphor for novice mode and eyes-free selection for expert mode , 2010, AVI.

[17]  Daniel S. Weld,et al.  Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces , 2006, AVI '06.

[18]  Dong-Seok Lee,et al.  Quantitative results assessing design issues of selection-supportive menus , 2004 .

[19]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  # 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Adaptive Techniques for Universal Access , 1999 .

[20]  Ben Shneiderman Promoting universal usability with multi-layer interface design , 2002 .

[21]  Carolyn R. Watters,et al.  A comparison of simple hierarchy and grid metaphors for option layouts on small-size screens , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[22]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus , 2004, CHI.