Statistical methods in computational anatomy

This paper reviews recent developments by the Washington/Brown groups for the study of anatomical shape in the emerging new discipline of computational anatomy. Parametric representations of anatomical variation for computational anatomy are reviewed, restricted to the assumption of small deformations. The generation of covariance operators for probabilistic measures of anatomical variation on coordinatized submanifolds is formulated as an empirical procedure. Populations of brains are mapped to common coordinate systems, from which template coordinate systems are constructed which are closest to the population of anatomies in a minimum distance sense. Variation of several one-, two and three-dimensional manifolds, i.e. sulci, surfaces and brain volumes are examined via Gaussian measures with mean and covariances estimated directly from maps of templates to targets. Methods are presented for estimating the covariances of vector fields from a family of empirically generated maps, posed as generalized spectrum estimation indexed over the submanifolds. Covariance estimation is made parametric, analogous to autoregressive modelling, by introducing small deformation linear operators for constraining the spectrum of the fields.

[1]  Ulf Grenander,et al.  A Unified Approach to Pattern Analysis , 1970, Adv. Comput..

[2]  W. Boothby An introduction to differentiable manifolds and Riemannian geometry , 1975 .

[3]  F. Bookstein,et al.  The Measurement of Biological Shape and Shape Change. , 1980 .

[4]  R. Bajcsy,et al.  A computerized system for the elastic matching of deformed radiographic images to idealized atlas images. , 1983, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Anatomical-Functional Correlation Using an Adjustable MRI-Based Region of Interest Atlas with Positron Emission Tomography , 1988, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[6]  R. Bajcsy,et al.  Evaluation of Elastic Matching System for Anatomic (CT, MR) and Functional (PET) Cerebral Images , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Warping of a computerized 3-D atlas to match brain image volumes for quantitative neuroanatomical and functional analysis , 1991, Medical Imaging.

[8]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Plastic transformation of PET images. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Edge information at landmarks in medical images , 1992, Other Conferences.

[11]  J. Besag,et al.  Spatial Statistics and Bayesian Computation , 1993 .

[12]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  A deformable neuroanatomy textbook based on viscous uid mechanics , 1993 .

[13]  M I Miller,et al.  Mathematical textbook of deformable neuroanatomies. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  REPRESENTATIONS OF KNOWLEDGE IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[15]  Gary E. Christensen,et al.  Deformable Shape Models for Anatomy , 1994 .

[16]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  R. Thatcher Functional neuroimaging : technical foundations , 1994 .

[18]  R. Rabbitt,et al.  3D brain mapping using a deformable neuroanatomy. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Comparison of automated and manual segmentation of hippocampus MR images , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[20]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  A Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Brain: Theory and Rationale for Its Development The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) , 1995, NeuroImage.

[21]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Hierarchical brain mapping via a generalized Dirichlet solution for mapping brain manifolds , 1995, Optics & Photonics.

[22]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Automatic 3‐D model‐based neuroanatomical segmentation , 1995 .

[23]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Differential geometry of the cortical surface , 1995, Optics & Photonics.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[25]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  A computerized approach for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[26]  G. Christensen,et al.  Hippocampal MR imaging morphometry by means of general pattern matching. , 1996, Radiology.

[27]  F L Bookstein,et al.  Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. , 1996, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[28]  A. Toga,et al.  Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis of Sulcal Variability in the Human Brain , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[30]  C. Davatzikos Spatial normalization of 3D brain images using deformable models. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[31]  M W Vannier,et al.  Three-dimensional hippocampal MR morphometry with high-dimensional transformation of a neuroanatomic atlas. , 1997, Radiology.

[32]  Paul Dupuis,et al.  Variational problems on ows of di eomorphisms for image matching , 1998 .

[33]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  On The Geometry and Shape of Brain Sub-Manifolds , 1997, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[34]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.