Tagging in Volunteered Geographic Information: An Analysis of Tagging Practices for Cities and Urban Regions in OpenStreetMap

In Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) projects, the tagging or annotation of objects is usually performed in a flexible and non-constrained manner. Contributors to a VGI project are normally free to choose whatever tags they feel are appropriate to annotate or describe a particular geographic object or place. In OpenStreetMap (OSM), the Map Features part of the OSM Wiki serves as the de-facto rulebook or ontology for the annotation of features in OSM. Within Map Features, suggestions and guidance on what combinations of tags to use for certain geographic objects are outlined. In this paper, we consider these suggestions and recommendations and analyse the OSM database for 40 cities around the world to ascertain if contributors to OSM in these urban areas are using this guidance in their tagging practices. Overall, we find that compliance with the suggestions and guidance in Map Features is generally average or poor. This leads us to conclude that contributors in these areas do not always tag features with the same level of annotation. Our paper also confirms anecdotal evidence that OSM Map Features is less influential in how OSM contributors tag objects.

[1]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  A Conceptual Quality Framework for Volunteered Geographic Information , 2015, COSIT.

[2]  Robert Hecht,et al.  Measuring Completeness of Building Footprints in OpenStreetMap over Space and Time , 2013, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[3]  L. Yapa,et al.  OpenStreetMap and Food Security: A Case Study in the City of Philadelphia , 2016 .

[4]  Hartwig H. Hochmair,et al.  Cross-Linkage Between Mapillary Street Level Photos and OSM Edits , 2016, AGILE Conf..

[5]  Peter Mooney,et al.  Characteristics of Heavily Edited Objects in OpenStreetMap , 2012, Future Internet.

[6]  Fabio Crestani,et al.  A statistical comparison of tag and query logs , 2009, SIGIR.

[7]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  Defining Fitness-for-Use for Crowdsourced Points of Interest (POI) , 2016, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[8]  Sonja Špiranec,et al.  The 2 nd International Conference on Integrated Information Experts vs . novices tagging behavior : an exploratory analysis , 2013 .

[9]  Pascal Neis,et al.  A Comprehensive Framework for Intrinsic OpenStreetMap Quality Analysis , 2014, Trans. GIS.

[10]  Michael Stonebraker,et al.  The 8 requirements of real-time stream processing , 2005, SGMD.

[11]  Michael J. Muller.  Comparing tagging vocabularies among four enterprise tag-based services , 2007, GROUP.

[12]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  An Introduction to OpenStreetMap in Geographic Information Science: Experiences, Research, and Applications , 2015, OpenStreetMap in GIScience.

[13]  Dan Wu,et al.  Comparing social tags with subject headings on annotating books: A study comparing the information science domain in English and Chinese , 2013, J. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Kai-Florian Richter,et al.  A Mobile Application for a User-Generated Collection of Landmarks , 2015, W2GIS.

[15]  Spencer E. Harpe.  How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data , 2015 .

[16]  Michela Bertolotto,et al.  Analysing the growth of OpenStreetMap networks , 2013 .

[17]  Bernhard Haslhofer,et al.  Annotations, tags and linked data. Metadata enrichment in online map collections through Volunteer-Contributed Information , 2011 .

[18]  P. Mooney,et al.  Patterns of tagging in OpenStreetMap data in urban areas , 2016 .

[19]  Peter Mooney,et al.  The Annotation Process in OpenStreetMap , 2012, Trans. GIS.

[20]  Marco Minghini,et al.  Observations on an OpenStreetMap mapping party organised as a social event during an open source GIS conference , 2015, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[21]  Mark Graham,et al.  Geography and the future of big data, big data and the future of geography , 2013 .

[22]  Arash Joorabchi,et al.  Automatic mapping of user tags to Wikipedia concepts: The case of a Q&A website – StackOverflow , 2015, J. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Karl Rehrl,et al.  Digging into the history of VGI data-sets: results from a worldwide study on OpenStreetMap mapping activity , 2014, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[24]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Colin Robertson,et al.  A multi-scale approach to exploring urban places in geotagged photographs , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[26]  Pascal Neis,et al.  Recent Developments and Future Trends in Volunteered Geographic Information Research: The Case of OpenStreetMap , 2014, Future Internet.

[27]  Pascal Neis,et al.  Areal Delineation of Home Regions from Contribution and Editing Patterns in OpenStreetMap , 2014, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[28]  Pascal Neis,et al.  Towards Automatic Vandalism Detection in OpenStreetMap , 2012, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[29]  David Elsweiler,et al.  Comparing Tweets and Tags for URLs , 2012, ECIR.

[30]  Domenico Talia,et al.  Mining human mobility patterns from social geo-tagged data , 2016, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[31]  B. Johnson,et al.  Integrating OpenStreetMap crowdsourced data and Landsat time-series imagery for rapid land use/land cover (LULC) mapping: Case study of the Laguna de Bay area of the Philippines , 2016 .

[32]  Carola Kunze,et al.  Semantic enrichment of building data with volunteered geographic information to improve mappings of dwelling units and population , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[33]  Peter Mooney,et al.  Analysis of Interaction and Co‐editing Patterns amongst OpenStreetMap Contributors , 2014, Trans. GIS.

[34]  Peter Mooney,et al.  Conceptualising the geographic world: the dimensions of negotiation in crowdsourced cartography , 2015, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[35]  Thomas Ertl,et al.  An OpenStreetMap Editing Interface for Visually Impaired Users Based on Geo-semantic Information , 2014, ICCHP.

[36]  Markus Strohmaier,et al.  Understanding why users tag: A survey of tagging motivation literature and results from an empirical study , 2012, J. Web Semant..

[37]  Bin Jiang,et al.  Crowdsourcing, Citizen Science or Volunteered Geographic Information? The Current State of Crowdsourced Geographic Information , 2016, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..