Cardiac sodium channels (hH1) are intrinsically more sensitive to block by lidocaine than are skeletal muscle (mu 1) channels

When lidocaine is given systemically, cardiac Na channels are blocked preferentially over those in skeletal muscle and nerve. This apparent increased affinity is commonly assumed to arise solely from the fact that cardiac Na channels spend a large fraction of their time in the inactivated state, which exhibits a high affinity for local anesthetics. The oocyte expression system was used to compare systematically the sensitivities of skeletal (mu 1-beta 1) and cardiac (hH1-beta 1) Na channels to block by lidocaine, under conditions in which the only difference was the choice of alpha subunit. To check for differences in tonic block, Na currents were elicited after 3 min of exposure to various lidocaine concentrations at -100 mV, a potential at which both hH1-beta 1 and mu 1-beta 1 channels were fully reprimed. Surprisingly, hH1-beta 1 Na channels were threefold more sensitive to rested-state block by lidocaine (402 +/- 36 microM, n = 4-22) than were mu 1-beta 1 Na channels (1,168 +/- 34 microM, n = 7-19). In contrast, the inactivated state binding affinities determined at partially depolarized holding potentials (h infinity approximately 0.2) were similar (Kd = 16 +/- 1 microM, n = 3-9 for hH1-beta 1 and 12 +/- 2 microM, n = 4-11 for mu 1-beta 1). Lidocaine produced more use- dependent block of peak hH1-beta 1 Na current elicited by trains of short-(10 ms) or long- (1 s) duration step depolarizations (0.5 Hz, -20 mV) than of mu 1-beta 1 Na current. During exposure to lidocaine, hH1- beta 1 channels recover from inactivation at -100 mV after a prolonged delay (20 ms), while mu 1-beta 1 channels begin repriming immediately. The overall time course of recovery from inactivation in the presence of lidocaine is much slower in hH1-beta 1 than in mu 1-beta 1 channels. These unexpected findings suggest that structural differences in the alpha subunits impart intrinsically different lidocaine sensitivities to the two isoforms. The differences in steady state affinities and in repriming kinetics are both in the correct direction to help explain the increased potency of cardiac Na channel block by local anesthetics.

[1]  L. Hondeghem,et al.  Evidence for Two Components of Sodium Channel Block by Lidocaine in Isolated Cardiac Myocytes , 1988, Circulation research.

[2]  R. Horn,et al.  Lidocaine block of human heart sodium channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. , 1992, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[3]  H. Fozzard,et al.  Is there a second external lidocaine binding site on mammalian cardiac cells? , 1989, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  B. Katzung,et al.  Time- and voltage-dependent interactions of antiarrhythmic drugs with cardiac sodium channels. , 1977, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  J. A. Wasserstrom,et al.  Modification of cardiac Na+ channels by batrachotoxin: effects on gating, kinetics, and local anesthetic binding. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[6]  J. Makielski,et al.  Temperature dependence of sodium current block by lidocaine in cardiac Purkinje cells. , 1991, American Journal of Physiology.

[7]  R. Lazzara,et al.  Effects of lidocaine on hypoxic and ischemic cardiac cells. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  C. Armstrong.  Interaction of Tetraethylammonium Ion Derivatives with the Potassium Channels of Giant Axons , 1971, The Journal of general physiology.

[9]  B. Hille.  The pH-dependent rate of action of local anesthetics on the node of Ranvier , 1977, The Journal of general physiology.

[10]  W. Catterall,et al.  Molecular determinants of state-dependent block of Na+ channels by local anesthetics. , 1994, Science.

[11]  R Horn,et al.  Primary structure and functional expression of the human cardiac tetrodotoxin-insensitive voltage-dependent sodium channel. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  A. Grant,et al.  Antiarrhythmic drug action: selective depression of hypoxic cardiac cells. , 1974, American heart journal.

[13]  P. Podrid.  Aggravation of arrhythmia: a complication of antiarrhythmic drug therapy. , 1989, European heart journal.

[14]  H. Duff,et al.  Class I antiarrhythmic drug receptor: biochemical evidence for state-dependent interaction with quinidine and lidocaine. , 1989, Molecular pharmacology.

[15]  G. Tomaselli,et al.  Molecular localization of an ion-binding site within the pore of mammalian sodium channels. , 1992, Science.

[16]  J. Trimmer,et al.  Primary structure and functional expression of a mammalian skeletal muscle sodium channel , 1989, Neuron.

[17]  B. Hille,et al.  Local anesthetics. Effect of pH on use-dependent block of sodium channels in frog muscle. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[18]  P. Abete,et al.  MECHANISMS OF LIDOCAINE ACTIONS ON NORMAL AND ABNORMAL RHYTHMS IN CANINE CARDIAC TISSUES IN VIVO AND IN VITRO , 1991, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[19]  K. Gingrich,et al.  Ultra‐deep blockade of Na+ channels by a quaternary ammonium ion: catalysis by a transition‐intermediate state? , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  E. Moczydlowski,et al.  Isochannels and Blocking Modes of Voltage‐Dependent Sodium Channels a , 1986, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[21]  A. L. Goldin,et al.  Amino acid residues required for fast Na(+)-channel inactivation: charge neutralizations and deletions in the III-IV linker. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  B. Hille,et al.  Local anesthetics: hydrophilic and hydrophobic pathways for the drug- receptor reaction , 1977, The Journal of general physiology.

[23]  C. Starmer,et al.  pH dependence of kinetics and steady-state block of cardiac sodium channels by lidocaine. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[24]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  Chung-Chin Kuo,et al.  Na+ channels must deactivate to recover from inactivation , 1994, Neuron.