Positron emission tomography (PET) for prediction of glioma histology: protocol for an individual-level data meta-analysis of test performance

Introduction Gliomas, the most commonly diagnosed primary brain tumours, are associated with varied survivals based, in part, on their histological subtype. Therefore, accurate pretreatment tumour grading is essential for patient care and clinical trial design. Methods and analysis We will perform an individual-level data meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate the ability of different types of positron emission tomography (PET) to differentiate high from low-grade gliomas. We will search PubMed and Scopus from inception through 30 July 2017 with no language restriction and full-text evaluation of potentially relevant articles. We will choose studies that assess PET using 18-Fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), l-[Methyl-()11C]Methionine (11C-MET), 18F-Fluoro-Ethyl-Tyrosine (18F-FET) or (18)F-Fluorothymidine (18F-FLT)for grading, verified with histological confirmation. We will include both prospective and retrospective studies. Bias will be assessed by two reviewers with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool and as per method described by Deeks et al. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was not applicable, as this is a meta-analytic study. Results of the analysis will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO registration number CRD42017078649.

[1]  S. Sheikhbahaei,et al.  The Value of FDG PET/CT in Treatment Response Assessment, Follow-Up, and Surveillance of Lung Cancer. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  T. Kwee,et al.  Pretransplant FDG‐PET in aggressive non‐Hodgkin lymphoma: systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, European journal of haematology.

[3]  Walter J. Curran,et al.  Radiation plus Procarbazine, CCNU, and Vincristine in Low-Grade Glioma. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  M. Weller,et al.  Dynamic 18F‐FET PET in suspected WHO grade II gliomas defines distinct biological subgroups with different clinical courses , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[5]  M. Berger,et al.  Survival and low-grade glioma: the emergence of genetic information. , 2015, Neurosurgical focus.

[6]  R. Sweeney,et al.  O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine uptake is an independent prognostic determinant in patients with glioma referred for radiation therapy , 2014, Annals of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  T. Nihashi,et al.  PET in the clinical management of glioma: evidence map. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  T. Nihashi,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of PET for Recurrent Glioma Diagnosis: A Meta-Analysis , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[9]  S. Evans,et al.  Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database Analysis of Verrucous Carcinoma of the Vulva , 2012 .

[10]  Lin Liu,et al.  Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Systems , 2012, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[11]  A. Shinomiya,et al.  Usefulness of FDG, MET and FLT-PET Studies for the Management of Human Gliomas , 2012, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[12]  J. N. van den Anker,et al.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Pediatric Drug Development: A Clinician's Request for a More Integrated Approach , 2012, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[13]  Yuan Hu,et al.  Protection of SH-SY5Y Neuronal Cells from Glutamate-Induced Apoptosis by 3,6′-Disinapoyl Sucrose, a Bioactive Compound Isolated from Radix Polygala , 2011, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[14]  R. Boellaard Need for Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  J. Tonn,et al.  Molecular imaging of gliomas with PET: opportunities and limitations. , 2011, Neuro-oncology.

[16]  Richard D Riley,et al.  Meta‐analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Roger M Harbord,et al.  A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. , 2007, Biostatistics.

[18]  Jonathan J Deeks,et al.  The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.