Geometry and topology of parameter space: investigating measures of robustness in regulatory networks

The concept of robustness of regulatory networks has been closely related to the nature of the interactions among genes, and the capability of pattern maintenance or reproducibility. Defining this robustness property is a challenging task, but mathematical models have often associated it to the volume of the space of admissible parameters. Not only the volume of the space but also its topology and geometry contain information on essential aspects of the network, including feasible pathways, switching between two parallel pathways or distinct/disconnected active regions of parameters. A method is presented here to characterize the space of admissible parameters, by writing it as a semi-algebraic set, and then theoretically analyzing its topology and geometry, as well as volume. This method provides a more objective and complete measure of the robustness of a developmental module. As a detailed case study, the segment polarity gene network is analyzed.

[1]  M. Savageau,et al.  Parameter Sensitivity as a Criterion for Evaluating and Comparing the Performance of Biochemical Systems , 1971, Nature.

[2]  George E. Collins,et al.  Quantifier elimination for real closed fields by cylindrical algebraic decomposition , 1975 .

[3]  J. Todd.  The Solution of Equations , 1979 .

[4]  George E. Collins,et al.  Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition I: The Basic Algorithm , 1984, SIAM J. Comput..

[5]  P. Ingham,et al.  Cell patterning in the Drosophila segment: spatial regulation of the segment polarity gene patched. , 1990, Development.

[6]  S. Eaton,et al.  Repression of ci-D in posterior compartments of Drosophila by engrailed. , 1990, Genes & development.

[7]  George E. Collins,et al.  Partial Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition for Quantifier Elimination , 1991, J. Symb. Comput..

[8]  Wolfgang Hennig,et al.  Genomic Imprinting , 1999, Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation.

[9]  M. Scott,et al.  The molecular genetic basis of positional information in insect segments. , 1992, Results and problems in cell differentiation.

[10]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  The Mathematica Book , 1996 .

[11]  R. Heinrich,et al.  The Regulation of Cellular Systems , 1996, Springer US.

[12]  Dragan Nesic,et al.  Software for Control System Analysis and Design: Symbol Manipulation , 1999 .

[13]  J. W. Little,et al.  Robustness of a gene regulatory circuit , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[14]  U. Alon,et al.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis , 2022 .

[15]  Enrico Gobbetti,et al.  Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering , 1999 .

[16]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[17]  Hossein Zand.  The Mathematica Book, 4th edition: By Stephen Wolfram, Cambridge University Press and Wolfram Media, Cambridge, 1999, xxvi+1400 pp. Wolfram ISBN 1-57955-004-5, CUP ISBN 0-521-64314-7, £35.00 (paperback) , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Bénédicte Sanson,et al.  Generating patterns from fields of cells , 2001, EMBO reports.

[19]  B. Sanson.  Examples from Drosophila segmentation , 2001 .

[20]  Gerardo Lafferriere,et al.  Symbolic Reachability Computation for Families of Linear Vector Fields , 2001, J. Symb. Comput..

[21]  G. Odell,et al.  Design and constraints of the Drosophila segment polarity module: robust spatial patterning emerges from intertwined cell state switches. , 2002, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[22]  Anirvan M. Sengupta,et al.  Specificity and robustness in transcription control networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  J. Gergen,et al.  Ftz modulates Runt-dependent activation and repression of segment-polarity gene transcription , 2004, Development.

[25]  C. Tomlin,et al.  Symbolic reachable set computation of piecewise affine hybrid automata and its application to biological modelling: Delta-Notch protein signalling. , 2004, Systems biology.

[26]  Nicholas T Ingolia,et al.  Topology and Robustness in the Drosophila Segment Polarity Network , 2004, PLoS biology.

[27]  Madalena Chaves,et al.  Robustness and fragility of Boolean models for genetic regulatory networks. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  M Chaves,et al.  Methods of robustness analysis for Boolean models of gene control networks. , 2006, Systems biology.

[29]  I Postlethwaite,et al.  Robustness analysis of biochemical network models. , 2006, Systems biology.

[30]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Robustness and modular design of the Drosophila segment polarity network , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[31]  Christopher R. Myers,et al.  Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  David M. Umulis,et al.  Robustness of embryonic spatial patterning in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2008, Current topics in developmental biology.

[33]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Shape, Size, and Robustness: Feasible Regions in the Parameter Space of Biochemical Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..